A Study of Cerebral Perfusion With tDCS in Chronic Hypoperfusion

January 16, 2026 updated by: Zafer Keser, Mayo Clinic

Augmenting Cerebral Perfusion With Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS) in Chronic Hypoperfusion States

This study is being done to examine whether transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) will increase cerebral blood flow which may provide a clinical benefit such as improving cognitive impairment.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

50

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Minnesota
      • Rochester, Minnesota, United States, 55905
        • Mayo Clinic in Rochester

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Vasculopathy leading to imaging evidence of hypoperfusion
  • Cognitive impairment

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Pregnancy
  • Contraindication to MRI or tDCS including metallic implanted objects.
  • Medical instability or inability to cooperate during the study as assessed by the treating physician to participate in the study.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Supportive Care
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Crossover Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Phase I - Health Volunteer Group: Active Stimulation, Then Sham Stimulation
Healthy subjects will receive 20 minutes of 2 mA tDCS concurrently with MRI cerebral blood flow (CBF) imaging immediately followed by no stimulation and CBF imaging. Next, subjects will receive sham stimulation concurrently with CBF imaging immediately followed by no stimulation and CBF imaging.
Is intended for inducing cortical neuromodulation for research and treatment purposes.
Experimental: Phase I - Health Volunteer Group: Sham Stimulation, Then Active Stimulation
Healthy subjects will receive sham stimulation concurrently with MRI CBF imaging immediately followed by no stimulation and CBF imaging. Next, subjects will receive 20 minutes of 2 mA tDCS concurrently with CBF imaging immediately followed by no stimulation and CBF imaging.
Is intended for inducing cortical neuromodulation for research and treatment purposes.
Experimental: Phase I Disease Group: Active Stimulation, Then Sham Stimulation
Subject diagnosed with Moyamoya disease or severe extracranial atherosclerotic disease will receive 20 minutes of 2 mA tDCS concurrently with MRI cerebral blood flow (CBF) imaging immediately followed by no stimulation and CBF imaging. Next, subjects will receive sham stimulation concurrently with CBF imaging immediately followed by no stimulation and CBF imaging.
Is intended for inducing cortical neuromodulation for research and treatment purposes.
Experimental: Phase I Disease Group: Sham Stimulation, Then Active Stimulation
Subject diagnosed with Moyamoya disease or severe extracranial atherosclerotic disease will receive sham stimulation concurrently with MRI CBF imaging immediately followed by no stimulation and CBF imaging. Next, subjects will receive 20 minutes of 2 mA tDCS concurrently with CBF imaging immediately followed by no stimulation and CBF imaging.
Is intended for inducing cortical neuromodulation for research and treatment purposes.
Experimental: Phase II Active Stimulation, Then Sham Stimulation
Subjects first receive active tDCS plus cognitive training every weekday for 10 days. After washout period of 4 weeks, they will perform at-home sham tDCS plus cognitive training every weekday for 10 days.
At-home remotely supervised transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) at an intensity of 2 mA for 20 minutes per session, with slow ramp-up and automatic turn off once it reaches the maximal intensity.
Computerized cognitive therapy for 45 minutes per day that starts at the same time with stimulation
Experimental: Phase II Sham Stimulation, Then Active Stimulation
Subjects first receive sham tDCS plus cognitive training daily for 10 days. After a washout period of 4 weeks, they will perform at-home active tDCS plus cognitive training daily for 10 days.
At-home remotely supervised transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) at an intensity of 2 mA for 20 minutes per session, with slow ramp-up and automatic turn off once it reaches the maximal intensity.
Computerized cognitive therapy for 45 minutes per day that starts at the same time with stimulation

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Changes in cerebral blood flow
Time Frame: Phase 1 Day 0 and Phase 2 Day 0, 14, 44, and 58
Cerebral blood flow imaging assessed by MRI to measure blood flow through the blood vessels reported in millimeters of mercury (mmHg)
Phase 1 Day 0 and Phase 2 Day 0, 14, 44, and 58

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in cognitive impairment
Time Frame: Phase 2 Days 0, 14±3, 44±7, and 58±14, 72±14
Assessed using the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA), which is a 30-item questionnaire that includes tests of orientation, attention, memory, language and visual-spatial skills. Possible total scores range from 0 to 30, with higher scores indicating higher cognitive function. A final total score of 26 and above is consider normal.
Phase 2 Days 0, 14±3, 44±7, and 58±14, 72±14
Change in Fatigue Severity Scale (FFS)
Time Frame: Phase 2 Days 0, 14±3, 44±7, and 58±14, 72±14
Assessed using the Fatigue Severity Scale (FFS) 9-item questionnaire that contains statements that rate fatigue symptoms on a scale of 1 to 7 where a low value (e.g., 1) indicates strong disagreement with the statement and a high value (e.g., 7) indicates strong agreement. Possible total scores range from 9 to 63, with higher scores indicating greater fatigue severity.
Phase 2 Days 0, 14±3, 44±7, and 58±14, 72±14
Change in Visual Analogue Scale to Evaluate Fatigue Severity (VAS-F)
Time Frame: Phase I Day 0, Phase 2 Days 0, 14±3, 44±7, and 58±14, 72±14
Assessed using the Visual Analogue Scale to Evaluate Fatigue Severity (VAS-F) 18-item questionnaire that rates how a subject is currently feeling in regards to fatigue symptoms on a scale of 0 to 10 where a low value (e.g., 0) indicates "not at all/no effort at all" and a high value (e.g., 10) indicates "extremely/tremendous chore". Possible total scores range from 0 to 180, with higher scores indicating greater fatigue severity.
Phase I Day 0, Phase 2 Days 0, 14±3, 44±7, and 58±14, 72±14
Change in Stroke Specific Quality of Life (SS-QOL)
Time Frame: Phase 2 Days 0, 14±3, 44±7, and 58±14, 72±14
Assessed using the Stroke Specific Quality of Life (SS-QOL) 49-item questionnaire assessing quality of life with regards to energy, family roles, language, mobility, mood, personality, self-care, social roles, thinking, upper extremity function, vision, and work/productivity on a scale of 1 to 5 where a low value (e.g., 1) indicates "total help/couldn't do it at all/strongly agree" and a high value (e.g., 5) indicates "no help needed/no trouble at all/strongly disagree". Possible total scores range from 49 to 245, with higher scores indicating better quality of life.
Phase 2 Days 0, 14±3, 44±7, and 58±14, 72±14
Change in depression severity
Time Frame: Phase 2 Days 0, 14±3, 44±7, and 58±14, 72±14
Assessed using the Patient Health Questionnaire 9-item (PHQ-9) scale to assess severity of depression. Scoring is calculated by assigning scores of 0, 1, 2, and 3 to the response categories, respectively, of "not at all," "several days," "more than half the days," and "nearly every day." Total score for the nine items ranges from 0 to 27 where 0 is no depression, 1-4 is minimal depression, 5-9 is mild depression, 10-14 is moderate depression, and 15-19 is moderately severe depression and 20-27 severe depression.
Phase 2 Days 0, 14±3, 44±7, and 58±14, 72±14
Change in sleepiness
Time Frame: Phase 2 Days 0, 14±3, 44±7, and 58±14, 72±14
Assessed using the Epworth sleepiness scale (ESS) 8-item questionnaire that measures daytime sleepiness in participants. Possible scores range from 0-24, with higher scores indicating a higher average sleep propensity in daily life, and a worse outcome.
Phase 2 Days 0, 14±3, 44±7, and 58±14, 72±14
Change in trail making test
Time Frame: Phase 2 Days 0, 14±3, 44±7, and 58±14, 72±14
The Trail Making Test is a two part assessment of cognitive functions, principally attention and working memory. Subjects connect a set of 25 dots as quickly as possible, connect 13 dots labeled alphabetically, and 12 dots that are numbered in an alternating pattern as quickly as possible without lifting the pen. Results are reported as the number of seconds required to complete the task with higher scores indicating greater impairment.
Phase 2 Days 0, 14±3, 44±7, and 58±14, 72±14
Change in memory task
Time Frame: Phase 2 Days 0, 14±3, 44±7, and 58±14, 72±14
Assessed using the Consortium to Establish a Registry for Alzheimer's Disease (CERAD) wordlist memory test (WLT). This is a memory task for assessing word list recall. A list of 10 words are read 3 times and subjects are asked to recall the list of words. The more words recalled indicates less cognitive impairment.
Phase 2 Days 0, 14±3, 44±7, and 58±14, 72±14

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Zafer Keser, Mayo Clinic

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

October 24, 2024

Primary Completion (Estimated)

June 1, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

June 1, 2026

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

June 6, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 25, 2024

First Posted (Actual)

June 27, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

January 20, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 16, 2026

Last Verified

January 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

Yes

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Moyamoya Disease

Clinical Trials on Soterix® 4x1HD-TDCS

Subscribe