Early Warning Scores in Pregnant Woman

July 3, 2024 updated by: Onurcan BALIK, Suleyman Demirel University

Effectiveness of Early Warning Scores: Preoperative Period in Pregnant Women

Our study aims to evaluate the use of early warning scores as a screening tool to predict obstetric mortality and morbidity in pregnant women who will undergo cesarean section.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Our study aims to evaluate the use of early warning scores as a screening tool to predict obstetric mortality and morbidity in pregnant women who will undergo cesarean section.

This prospective study included 304 patients undergoing cesarean section at Suleyman Demirel University between April 2022 and April 2023. Physiological parameters were assessed in all 304 pregnant women before the operation. Maternal early warning scores, including modified early obstetric warning score (MEOWS), maternal early warning score (MEWC), and maternal early warning triggers (MEWT), were calculated for each patient. Patients triggering the system were classified as Group 1 (risky patients), while those not triggering the system were classified as Group 2 (risk-free patients).

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

304

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Merkez
      • Isparta, Merkez, Turkey, 32200
        • Suleyman Demirel University

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child
  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • All patients who are pregnant and undergo cesarean section

Exclusion Criteria:

  • None

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Prevention
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Sequential Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Other: All patients who are pregnant and undergo cesarean section
We included all patients who were pregnant and underwent cesarean section and calculated maternal early warning scores.
Our study aims to evaluate the use of early warning scores as a screening tool to predict obstetric mortality and morbidity in pregnant women who will undergo cesarean section.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
MEOWS, MEWC and MEWT scores
Time Frame: One year
The presence of a "trigger" for MEOWS in all systems, defined as either a single severely abnormal parameter (falling in the "red" zone) or two slightly abnormal parameters (falling in the "yellow" zone), was categorized as the risky group. Absence or mildness of the trigger was considered as the risk-free group.
One year
MEWC score
Time Frame: One year
In the case of MEWC, the presence of only one abnormal parameter designated the risk group, while the absence of a trigger indicated the risk-free group.
One year
MEWT score
Time Frame: One year
For MEWT, the presence of a "trigger" defined as either a single severely abnormal parameter (falling in the "red" zone) or two mildly abnormal parameters (falling in the "yellow" zone) was categorized as the risky group, with the absence or mildness of the trigger considered as the risk-free group.
One year

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
APGAR score
Time Frame: One year
APGAR scores at 1st and 5th minutes were calculated for postnatal babies.
One year
Aldrete score
Time Frame: One year
The Modified Aldrete Recovery Score System was computed for mothers to assess postoperative recovery.
One year
Glasgow Coma Scale
Time Frame: One year
The Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) was used to evaluate the consciousness of pregnant women.
One year

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

April 1, 2022

Primary Completion (Actual)

April 1, 2023

Study Completion (Actual)

February 1, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

June 27, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 3, 2024

First Posted (Actual)

July 5, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

July 5, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 3, 2024

Last Verified

July 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Pregnancy Complications

Clinical Trials on All patients who were pregnant and underwent cesarean section

Subscribe