- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT06493435
Efficiency of Patient Blood Management Protocol in Gynecological Surgery Department (PERIOPESGYNECO) (PERIOPESGYNECO)
July 4, 2024 updated by: University Hospital, Angers
Evaluation du Protocole de PBM du Service de Chirurgie gynécologique du CHU d'Angers: étude Periope 2
Perioperative anemia is associated with higher risk of red blood cell transfusion, higher rates of morbimortality and lower quality of postoperative recovery.
In a context of focussing on higher quality management and improved recovery after surgery, development of Patient Blood management has increased.
This study aim to assess PBM protocole in a postoperative context of gynaecological surgery, by comparing indicators at two time periods: 2 and 8 months after establishment of PBM protocol.
Study Overview
Status
Not yet recruiting
Conditions
Study Type
Observational
Enrollment (Estimated)
160
Contacts and Locations
This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.
Study Contact
- Name: Elise Houssin
- Phone Number: +33 02 41 35 36 37
- Email: DRCI-Promotion-Interne@chu-angers.fr
Study Contact Backup
- Name: Sigismond Lasocki
- Phone Number: +33 0241353635
- Email: SiLasocki@chu-angers.fr
Participation Criteria
Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Adult
- Older Adult
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Sampling Method
Non-Probability Sample
Study Population
patient with planned surgery of hyterectomy or cancer related ovariectomy
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- age > 18 years
- being hospitalised for planned hysterectomy or cancer related ovariectomy
Exclusion Criteria:
- less than 18 years
- non french speaker
- being under a legal individual protection measure
- not being able to consent
- being opposed to data collection
Study Plan
This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.
How is the study designed?
Design Details
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
rate of immediate pre operative anemia
Time Frame: at 2 and 8 months after establishment of PBM protocol
|
preoperative Hb<13g/dL
|
at 2 and 8 months after establishment of PBM protocol
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
rate of preoperative anemia that need to be treated diagnosed during anesthetic consultation
Time Frame: at 2 and 8 months after establishment of PBM protocol
|
Hb<13 g/dL
|
at 2 and 8 months after establishment of PBM protocol
|
|
rate of Hemoglobin dosage available during anesthetic evaluation
Time Frame: at 2 and 8 months after establishment of PBM protocol
|
number and rate of blood analyses
|
at 2 and 8 months after establishment of PBM protocol
|
|
rate of preoperative iron deficiency that need to be treated diagnosed during anesthetic consultation
Time Frame: at 2 and 8 months after establishment of PBM protocol
|
blood ferritin level <100 ng/mL
|
at 2 and 8 months after establishment of PBM protocol
|
|
adequacy between diagnosed iron deficiency anemia and treatment
Time Frame: at 2 and 8 months after establishment of PBM protocol
|
rate of iron prescription
|
at 2 and 8 months after establishment of PBM protocol
|
|
effectiveness of iron treatment
Time Frame: at 2 and 8 months after establishment of PBM protocol
|
rate of persistent pre operative anemia after iron treatment
|
at 2 and 8 months after establishment of PBM protocol
|
|
immediat effect of surgery on anemia incidence
Time Frame: at 2 and 8 months after establishment of PBM protocol
|
rate of post operative anemia (Hb<12g/dL)/ rate of post operative iron treatment
|
at 2 and 8 months after establishment of PBM protocol
|
|
delayed effect of surgery on anemia incidence
Time Frame: at 2 and 8 months after establishment of PBM protocol
|
rate of delayed post operative anemia or iron deficiency
|
at 2 and 8 months after establishment of PBM protocol
|
|
early post operative recovery
Time Frame: at 2 and 8 months after establishment of PBM protocol
|
FQoR 15 on the day of hospital dischage
|
at 2 and 8 months after establishment of PBM protocol
|
|
delayed post operative recovery
Time Frame: at 2 and 8 months after establishment of PBM protocol
|
FQoR 15 at the post operative surgical visit
|
at 2 and 8 months after establishment of PBM protocol
|
|
adhesion to PBM protocol (rate of anemia)
Time Frame: at 2 and 8 months after establishment of PBM protocol
|
comparison of rate of anemia screening
|
at 2 and 8 months after establishment of PBM protocol
|
|
efficiency of PBM protocol (iron treatment rate)
Time Frame: at 2 and 8 months after establishment of PBM protocol
|
comparison of iron treatment rate
|
at 2 and 8 months after establishment of PBM protocol
|
|
adhesion to PBM protocol (missing datas)
Time Frame: at 2 and 8 months after establishment of PBM protocol
|
comparison of the rate of missing datas
|
at 2 and 8 months after establishment of PBM protocol
|
|
efficiency of PBM protocol (preoperative anemia rate)
Time Frame: at 2 and 8 months after establishment of PBM protocol
|
comparison of the rate of preoperative anemia
|
at 2 and 8 months after establishment of PBM protocol
|
|
efficiency of PBM protocol (perioperative transfusion rate)
Time Frame: at 2 and 8 months after establishment of PBM protocol
|
comparison of the rate of peri opeartive transfusion
|
at 2 and 8 months after establishment of PBM protocol
|
|
efficiency of PBM protocol (mean of FQoR-15)
Time Frame: at 2 and 8 months after establishment of PBM protocol
|
comparison of the mean of FQoR-15
|
at 2 and 8 months after establishment of PBM protocol
|
|
efficiency of PBM protocol (mean of FQoR-15 between patients with or without preoperative anemia)
Time Frame: at 2 and 8 months after establishment of PBM protocol
|
comparison of FQoR-15 means between patients with or without preoperative anemia
|
at 2 and 8 months after establishment of PBM protocol
|
|
efficiency of PBM protocol (rate of screening anemia and the rate of preoperative anemia )
Time Frame: at 2 and 8 months after establishment of PBM protocol
|
comparison of the rate of screening anemia and the rate of preoperative anemia
|
at 2 and 8 months after establishment of PBM protocol
|
|
efficiency of PBM protocol (Hb level between anesthetic evaluation and pre anesthetic visit)
Time Frame: at 2 and 8 months after establishment of PBM protocol
|
comparison of Hb level between anesthetic evaluation and pre anesthetic visit (paired T test)
|
at 2 and 8 months after establishment of PBM protocol
|
|
efficiency of PBM protocol (difference of hemoglobin level after iron treatment)
Time Frame: at 2 and 8 months after establishment of PBM protocol
|
mean difference of hemoglobin level after iron treatment
|
at 2 and 8 months after establishment of PBM protocol
|
Collaborators and Investigators
This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.
Sponsor
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Sigismond Lasocki, University Hospital, Angers
Study record dates
These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Estimated)
June 30, 2024
Primary Completion (Estimated)
December 31, 2025
Study Completion (Estimated)
December 31, 2026
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
June 18, 2024
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
July 4, 2024
First Posted (Actual)
July 10, 2024
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
July 10, 2024
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
July 4, 2024
Last Verified
June 1, 2024
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- 24_0207
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
NO
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
No
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Anemia
-
Hospital Universitario Dr. Jose E. GonzalezCompletedPernicious Anemia | Megaloblastic Anemia NosMexico
-
Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de ParisNot yet recruitingSevere Aplastic Anemia | Idiopathic Aplastic Anemia | Moderate Aplastic Anemia Requiring Transfusions
-
Institute of Hematology & Blood Diseases Hospital...Not yet recruitingSevere Aplastic Anemia | Refractory Aplastic Anemia | Newly Diagnosed Aplastic Anemia
-
SanofiActive, not recruitingWarm Autoimmune Hemolytic Anemia (wAIHA)United States, Austria, China, Denmark, Germany, Italy, Spain, United Kingdom, Hungary
-
SanofiTerminatedWarm Autoimmune Hemolytic Anemia (wAIHA)Netherlands, Germany, Italy, United Kingdom, United States, France
-
China Immunotech (Beijing) Biotechnology Co., Ltd.Not yet recruitingAutoimmune Hemolytic AnemiaChina
-
Peking Union Medical College HospitalNot yet recruiting
-
Chinese PLA General HospitalBeijing Friendship Hospital; Beijing 302 Hospital; The University of Hong Kong-Shenzhen... and other collaboratorsEnrolling by invitationSevere Aplastic Anemia | Severe Aplastic Anemia (SAA) | Severe Aplastic Anemia, RefractoryChina
-
Incyte CorporationTerminatedWarm Autoimmune Hemolytic Anemia (wAIHA)Spain, United States, Austria, Canada, France, Germany, Israel, Italy, Japan, Netherlands, Poland, United Kingdom, Belgium
-
Chen MiaoNot yet recruiting