Added Value of PET/CT in Lung Cancer

July 2, 2024 updated by: Mennatallah Ahmed Ragheb, Sohag University

Added Value of 18F-FDG PET/CT in Lung Cancer

Assess the value of PET/CT in the diagnosis, staging, response evaluation, and relapse monitoring of lung cancer.

Study Overview

Status

Not yet recruiting

Conditions

Detailed Description

Lung cancer is a leading cause of cancer-related mortality worldwide, accounted for 1.80 million deaths in 2020.(1)Egyptian statistics showed that lung cancer in men represents 8.2% of among all cancers of men according to the Egyptian National Cancer Program in 2014 (3).Epidemiological data indicate that the main risk factor for the development of lung cancer is cigarette smoking.(4)Lung cancer is histologically divided into: Non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC), which accounts for 85% of cases and Small cell lung cancer (SCLC).(5)Due to absence of screening, most patients with lung cancer are not diagnosed until later stages, when the prognosis is poor.(6)Radiologic manifestations of bronchogenic carcinoma include obstructive pneumonitis or atelectasis, lung nodule or mass, apical mass, cavitated mass, or nodule or mass associated with lymphadenopathy(6)Conventional chest radiography, computed tomography (CT), magnetic resonance imaging, radionuclide scintigraphy, and positron emission tomography (PET) all have been used for NSCLC staging.(7)PET/CT is a well-established radiological modality with high diagnostic accuracy in metastases detection compared to usual CT. Also, it has been reported that up to 10% of patients with bronchogenic carcinoma are found to have metastases on PET/CT that were not detected on CT with subsequent different patients' staging. The high accuracy of PET/CT in tumor staging makes it important for the treatment strategy of either surgical treatment, radiotherapy, or chemotherapy. Also, it becomes essential during the follow-up to detect recurrence. PET/CT shows a higher ability to evaluate the early response to the treatment as chemotherapy by its ability to detect the metabolic response even before the size change.(8)The prognosis of lung tumors depends on early and accurate staging as well as the histopathological type of the primary tumor, with the squamous cell carcinoma type regarded to be of a worse prognosis than that of adenocarcinoma.(9)

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Estimated)

30

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

All the pathologically proved lung cancer patient in the oncology department at the sohag oncology Centre.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Pathologically proven lung cancer patients.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients with second malignancy.
  • Severely ill patient (patient with disturbed consciousness level, or couldn't lie during the imaging).
  • Uncontrolled diabetic patient with blood glucose level more than 200mg\dl.
  • Pregnant women.
  • Patient age <18 years.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
pathologically proved lung cancer patient

All the pathologically proved lung cancer patients by true cut needle biobsy are enrolled in the study.

the true cute needle biobsy procedure performed by two interventional radiologists and a pathologist. TCNB was guided by the use of a 16-detector CT device after local anesthesia is done and done either by ultrasound guidance or CT guidance.

The biobsy procedure done at the radiology department and the cores are examined by the pathology department, the patient lie prone, supine or in lateral decubitus according to the location of the lesion. A thoracic CT scan was performed first to evaluate the needle pathway and distance from the puncture site to the lesion. The needle pathway was selected to avoid bone, visible vessels, bullae, and fissures. The puncture site was chosen by the CT gantry laser lights and landmarks using a homemade radiopaque grid on the patient's skin. Local anaesthesia was induced with 5 mL of 2% lidocaine. An 18-G coaxial needle was used to puncture the lung, and a repeat CT scan was performed to evaluate the site of the needle. When the needle tip reached the lesion, the specimen was obtained by pressing the trigger of the needle. The specimen was reviewed by the pathologist.The specimen was placed in 10% formaldehyde for pathological examination.
Other Names:
  • TCNB

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Accuracy of PET CT in diagnosis of lung cancer
Time Frame: 1 Year
using the qualitative and quantitative measuring including the SUV max value in detection of the malignant potentiality of the pulmonary nodule or mass comparing it with the pathological result
1 Year
Value of PET CT in staging of lung cancer
Time Frame: 1 Year
using the PET CT in TNM staging with better detection of pleural , mediastinal extension /involvement, the value and accuracy of PET in detecting the potential malignancy of the mediastinal lymph nodes even the subcentemetric lymph nodes not adequately assessed by the usual CT.
1 Year
predicting the pathological subtype of lung cancer using the morphological and PET CT of pathologically proved lung masses
Time Frame: 1 Year

assessing the morphology of the lung mass including density, solid, subsolid and soft nodule.

site of the nodule/mass peripheral or centrally located. presence of cavitation or cystic changes. presence of speculated or irregular margin. measuring the SUV max and comparing it with the pathology of each mass/nodule.

1 Year
Differentiating between the primary mass and associated consolidation if present
Time Frame: 1 Year
using the PET CT (mainly the qualitative assessment) in differentiating the primary mass from the associated consolidation-atelectasis around
1 Year

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
assessment of the pleural thickening/effusion associated with the primary mass
Time Frame: 1 Year
assessing the qualitative and quantitative assessing the pleural thickening if found for differentiating the pleural involvement from the inflammatory pleural thickening
1 Year
presence of enlarged axillary Lns
Time Frame: 1 Year
assessing the activity of enlarged axillary Lns by measuring the SUV value
1 Year
assessing the Vocal cord paralysis in the pan-coast tumor
Time Frame: 1 Year
using the morphological assessment of the lower CT neck scans and the adduction of the vocal cord and the atrophic changes of the Muscle and loss of vocal cord physiological activity.
1 Year

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: mai sayed khalifa, MD, lecturer
  • Principal Investigator: doaa ibrahim mohamed, MD, lecturer

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Estimated)

July 15, 2024

Primary Completion (Estimated)

July 15, 2025

Study Completion (Estimated)

December 1, 2025

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

July 2, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 2, 2024

First Posted (Actual)

July 10, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

July 10, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 2, 2024

Last Verified

July 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Other Study ID Numbers

  • PET/CT in lung cancer

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Lung Cancer

Clinical Trials on True cut needle biobsy

Subscribe