Co-administration of IVM and ALB in School-based Deworming in Uganda (FACE-ITpilot)

December 17, 2024 updated by: Jennifer Keiser

The Feasibility and Acceptability of the Co-administration of Ivermectin and Albendazole vs Albendazole Alone, in the Frame of Mass Drug Administration to School-aged Children in Uganda: A Small-scale Implementation Pilot Study

The goal of this small-scale implementation research pilot study is to assess the feasibility and acceptability of the co-administration of ivermectin (IVM) and albendazole (ALB) compared to albendazole alone during school-based mass drug administration in Uganda. The study will target up to 10,000 school-aged children from 20 schools in Kabale and Kisoro districts in South-Western Uganda.

The main questions it aims to answer are:

  • How feasible is the introduction of co-administered IVM plus ALB in the routine school-based deworming campaign in terms of training, material and processes?
  • How well do beneficiary communities (pupils, parents) and implementers (teachers, health workers) accept the new treatment scheme and what are potential barriers and enablers for uptake?
  • What are common implementation-related costs that can inform the methodology to estimate monetary and non-monetary costs as well as performance of the two treatment arms for the future cost-effectiveness analysis?

The study employs a cross-sectional mixed-method design (we will collect qualitative and quantitative data) to evaluate the feasibility and acceptability of co-administering IVM and ALB versus ALB alone in routine school-based mass drug administration. Assessments will take place during and after the drug distribution to document the implementation process and evaluate experiences made by the different stakeholders (e.g. children, parents, teachers, health workers):

  • The implementation activities start with a training of all implementers at district level who will also undergo a pre- and post-training knowledge assessment.
  • Schoolchildren aged 5-14 years will receive a single dose of ALB alone or co-administered ALb (400mg) and IVM (200µg/kg; as determined by height category on a dose pole) by health workers at school. 1-2 weeks post-distribution a subsample of 19 children per school will be invited to answer to questionnaires administered by social science researchers.
  • Implementers will administer the treatments and document all distribution-related aspects during the campaign under supervision of the routine staff. Researchers will conduct additional monitoring and evaluation in order to assure data quality and provide support in performance assessment and cost evaluation.
  • Beneficiaries (parents) and implementers will be asked to take part in focus group discussions and questionnaire interviews one week after the drug distribution.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

8767

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Kampala, Uganda
        • Makerere University, College of Humanities and Social Sciences
      • Kampala, Uganda
        • Vector Borne & Neglected Tropical Disease Control Division, Ministry of Health

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

  • Study population receiving intervention: All eligible school-aged children (5-14 years) from 20 pre-selected schools present in the school at the day of the treatment campaign, will be treated with the respective single or combination treatment regimen depending on the treatment arm under which the schools fall.
  • Study population of post-distribution social science study: Subsamples of treated schoolchildren, parents of school-aged children of the respective study schools, teachers involved in distribution, health workers involved in distribution.

Description

  • School-aged children (5-14 years) of the selected schools
  • Written informed consent from the participant's parents/caretakers and assent (for children aged 8 years and older) from the participant him/herself or written informed consent from the school teacher (for children attending schools receiving routine albendazole deworming)
  • No signs of major acute or chronic illness
  • No known allergy to study medication (i.e. benzimidazoles or ivermectin)

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
Albendazole only
Schoolchildren aged 5-14 years of 10 schools randomized to receive the standard deworming treatment of a single dose of albendazole 400mg.
Single oral dose of Albendazole 400mg tablet
Other Names:
  • Zentel
Ivermectin and albendazole
Schoolchildren aged 5-14 years of 10 schools randomized to receive the combination treatment of a single dose of ivermectin 200ug/kg (according to height category using a dose-pole) plus albendazole 400mg.
Single oral dose of Albendazole 400mg tablet
Other Names:
  • Zentel
Generic ivermectin 3mg tablets given as a single oral dose of 200ug/kg using a dose-pole (height categories: 90-119 cm: 1 tablet , 120-140 cm: 2 tablets, 141-158 cm: 3 tablets or > 158 cm: 4 tablets)
Other Names:
  • Stromectol
  • Mectizan

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Feasibility of IVM + ALB introduction
Time Frame: Documentation before, during and up to 12 weeks after the drug distribution

Feasibility will be assessed using quantitative and qualitative data sources for the following performance and process indicators:

  • Reported therapeutic coverage (proportion)
  • Programme reach (proportion)
  • Compliance rate (children that ingested drugs divided by the total number of children who got offered the drugs)
  • Reasons for not offering the drugs (non-eligibility)
  • Reasons for not swallowing the drugs (refusal)
  • Reported safety: Number, type and severity of adverse events recorded
  • Incremental time needs for IVM-ALB co-administration
  • Additional training needs
  • Incremental staff needs
  • Drug logistics (tablet balance)

Short and structured training evaluation questionnaires will be administered to teachers and health workers directly after training and cover aspects on (i) drug dosing including dose-pole utilization, (ii) identification of non-eligible populations, (iii) documentation processes and (iv) drug information (including safety)

Documentation before, during and up to 12 weeks after the drug distribution

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Acceptability and barriers & enablers to introduction of IVM-ALB co-administration (recipient perspective)
Time Frame: 1-2 weeks after drug distribution

Qualitative data on acceptability of the intervention from a recipient perspective (parents) will be collected trough FGDs that will cover:

  • Current knowledge about STHs: transmission, health impact, prevention and treatment
  • Prior knowledge of MDA activities and related experiences
  • Potential enabling factors for willingness of parents to let their children participate in MDA
  • Potential barriers for acceptance of parents for their child's participation in MDA

Quantitative data on acceptability of the intervention from a recipient perspective (schoolchildren) will be collected through structured interviews using Likert scale questions (5-point scale from strongly disagree to strongly agree) and cover aspects on:

  • Attitudes towards treatment
  • Convenience of taking the treatment
  • Self-reported willingness and understanding for need of treatment
  • Self-reported satisfaction with the treatment and procedures of the campaign
1-2 weeks after drug distribution
Potential incremental costs related to IVM-ALB co-administration
Time Frame: Documentation before, during and up to 12 weeks after the drug distribution

The following cost components related to the activities required to implement the interventions will be included in the analysis:

  • Medicine Procurement and Distribution: Costs associated with purchasing and distributing albendazole and ivermectin.
  • Stationary and Supplies: Costs related to necessary materials for documentation and record-keeping.
  • Transport: Costs involved in transporting medicines and supplies to the designated MDA locations.
  • Allowances: Allowances provided to personnel involved in the implementation.
  • Training Costs: Expenses associated with training personnel on the co-administration protocol.
  • Personnel Time: Costs of personnel time dedicated to delivering interventions.
Documentation before, during and up to 12 weeks after the drug distribution
Acceptability and barriers & enablers to introduction of IVM-ALB co-administration (provider perspective)
Time Frame: 1-2 weeks after drug distribution

Qualitative data on acceptability of the intervention from a provider perspective (teachers and health workers) will be collected trough FGDs and KIIs and will cover:

  • Current knowledge about STHs: transmission, health impact, prevention and treatment
  • Prior involvement in any MDA activities and related experiences
  • Post-distribution training evaluation
  • Potential enabling factors for willingness and barriers for acceptance of parents to let their children participate in MDA

Quantitative data on acceptability of the intervention from a provider perspective will be collected through structured interviews using Likert scale questions (5-point scale from strongly disagree to strongly agree) and cover:

  • Attitudes towards treatment
  • Convenience of distributing the treatment and satisfaction with training
  • Observed willingness and understanding for need of treatment
  • Observed satisfaction with the treatment and procedures of the campaign
1-2 weeks after drug distribution

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Jennifer Keiser, Prof., Swiss Tropical & Public Health Institute

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

July 1, 2024

Primary Completion (Actual)

July 16, 2024

Study Completion (Actual)

October 19, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

June 26, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 3, 2024

First Posted (Actual)

July 11, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 25, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 17, 2024

Last Verified

December 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

IPD Plan Description

There is a data sharing agreement between Swiss TPH, Uganda MoH and Makerere University in place. Data may be shared with other researchers upon request.

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Helminthiasis

Clinical Trials on Albendazole 400mg

Subscribe