EOSS-ATTR Study (eHealth Based Operative Support System in ATTR-CM) (eOSS-ATTR)

October 21, 2024 updated by: Sergi Yun, Hospital Universitari de Bellvitge

Information and Communications Technology (ICT)-based Modeling of Transthyretin-associated Amyloidosis Cardiomyopathies (ATTR-CM) Care: EOSS-ATTR Study (eHealth Based Operative Support System in ATTR-CM)

Unicenter, proof-of-concept, prospective, randomised, controlled, open-label and blinded end-point adjudication trial to assess the effect on patient-reported outcomes measures (PROMs), patient-reported experience measures (PREMs) and clinical events of a mHealth-based comprehensive management program for patients with chronic heart failure (HF) due to transthyretin-associated amyloidosis (ATTR)-cardiomyopathy (CM) by means of remote daily telemonitoring of signs and symptoms and remote structured follow-up using videoconference.

Study Overview

Status

Not yet recruiting

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

Background and Rationale:

Early diagnosis as well as optimal care of transthyretin-associated amyloidosis (ATTR)-cardiomyopathy (CM) is crucial to improve the outcome of these patients. In order to perform a personalised and patient-centred ATTR-CM, it is essential to integrate new advanced diagnostic and monitoring tools to the pre-existing ones. In this regard, electronic health (eHealth)-based solutions have been gradually being incorporated into the follow-up of chronic patients (e.g. heart failure [HF] patients, among others) over the last few years.

Objectives:

The main objective of this study is to improve the process of care, diagnosis and monitoring of the patient with ATTR-CM by means of a multidisciplinary and transversal model using new digital technologies and optimizing work processes (eHealth-based healthcare management). The primary objective of the study will be the changes in patient-reported outcomes (PROMs) such as self-care and quality of life (QoL) between patients followed and monitored using the mHealth-based digital tool (mHealth) and those in standard follow-up (usual care [UC]). Key secondary objectives will include changes in patient-reported experience measures (PREMs), the occurrence of events, among others between those with and without mHealth-base-ATTR management.

Methodology:

The eOSS-ATTR study will be a study with 2 phases: i) #Phase 1: a design, implantation and pre-clinical evaluation of the digital platform; and ii) #Phase 2: a subsequent clinical evaluation phase. The clinical phase (#Phase 2) will be a unicenter, proof-of-concept, prospective, randomised, controlled, open-label and blinded end-point adjudication trial to assess the effect on PROMs, PREMs and clinical events of a mHealth-based comprehensive management program for patients with HF due to ATTR-CM by means of remote daily telemonitoring of signs and symptoms and remote structured follow-up using videoconference. Regarding #Phase 1, it is proposed to evolve the MAST (Model for Assessment of Telemedicine) model, adding the consideration of the stakeholders involved in the use of this technology, as well as the different use cases and scenarios. All assessed items will be compared before and after the eHealth solution implementation. Concering #Pase 2, HF patients due to ATTR-CM with a HF decompensation in the last 12 months will be randomised (1:1) to structured follow-up based on face-to-face appointments (UC group) or the delivery of health care using mHealth (mHealth group). Randomisation will be stratified at each ATTR subtype (variant [ATTRv] or wild-type form [ATTRwt] and according to the presence or absence of frailty to ensure balanced assignment of frail patients to each group. The follow-up will be of 6 months in two groups and will be nurse-led and based on mHealth solution designed and modeled for the follow-up of patients with ATTR-CM in the mHealth group. This technological solution is proposed to improve the care monitoring and outcomes of ATTR-CM patients. Patients will be recruited for 12 months.

Expected Results:

eOSS-ATTR study is the first trial to integrate and assess mHealth solutions combining telemonitoring and structured teleintervention via videoconference in 'real-world' HF patients due to ATTR-CM to improve clinical outcomes and new clinical events. Its great value is that it assesses 'real-world' patients in terms of frailty, comorbidity, literacy level, skills with new technologies among others. Such strategies are of enormous value for the prognosis, QoL and experience of patients with HF due to ATTR-CM. Integration of solutions based on mHealth into day-to-day HF monitoring with user-friendly technology that provides the possibility of direct contact with their care team can contribute to a clear clear improvement in PROMs and PREMs as well as a reduction of new clinical events. It will allow us to optimise the care of HF due to ATTR-CM patients in this period in terms of self-care education as well as treatment optimisation and empowerment in disease management.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

50

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age ≥ 18 years old
  • HF diagnosis according to European Society of Cardiology (ESC)
  • Patients with a HF decompensation in the last 12 months
  • Confirmed diagnosis of ATTR-CM (ATTRv or ATTRwt)
  • Written informed consent

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Age<18 years old
  • Participation in another clinical trial
  • Moderate or severe cognitive impairment without a competent caregiver
  • Lack of social support
  • Institutionalized patients
  • Life expectancy less than 1 year (excluding HF)
  • Institutional-based or end-of-life care
  • Serious psychiatric illness
  • Planned cardiac surgery
  • Planned heart transplantation or left ventricular assist device (LVAD) implant
  • Patients in haemodialysis program
  • The patient is unable or unwilling to give the informed consent to participate
  • The patient is considered an unsuitable candidate for this study according to the decision of the local investigator
  • Unstable patients with signs of fluid overload or low cardiac output

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Health Services Research
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: mHealth
Structured follow-up in the basis of using mHealth-based solution. mHealth will include daily signs and symptoms telemonitoring and structured follow-up by the means of video or audio-conference.

Follow-up and treatment of patients in the mHealth arm will be based on a comprehensive solution for the care and monitoring of chronic patients, modelled and tested in chronic HF patients. This is the PIRENe platform, previously described and evaluated in HF patients. It is a digital solution, external to the centre's information systems (external platform). However, it has some special features in its design in terms of remote monitoring, educational tools, among others, expressly conceived and designed for patients with ATTR-CM. This platform allows the provision of multichannel service and monitoring of patients through:

  1. Patient monitoring of: Biometric data and symptom report.
  2. Generation and management of warning alarms notified to the professionals assigned to each patient in case one of the following situations occurs.
  3. Follow-up via videoconference.
No Intervention: Usual care
Patients with usual care follow-up in a heart failure due to ATTR-CM program.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Improvement of self-care using a validated scale (European Heart Failure Self-Care Behavior Scale).
Time Frame: Six months after inclusion of the patient
changes in patient-reported outcomes (PROMs) such as self-care European Heart Failure Self-Care Behaviour Scale) between patients followed and monitored using the mHealth-based digital tool (mHealth) and those in standard follow-up (usual care [UC]).
Six months after inclusion of the patient
Improvement of quality of life using a validated questionnaire (EUROQOL - 5D).
Time Frame: Six months after inclusion of the patient
Comparison of both strategies at the end of follow-up.
Six months after inclusion of the patient

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Occurrence of new clinical events (readmission [all-cause, HF, CV and non-CV] rate and total number; worsening HF events; urgent HF visits; all-cause, CV and non-CV death).
Time Frame: Six months after inclusion of the patient
Comparison of both strategies at the end of follow-up.
Six months after inclusion of the patient
Incidence of implantation of devices (pacemakers, cardiac resynchronization therapy [CRT] or implantable cardioverter defibrillator [ICD])
Time Frame: Six months after inclusion of the patient
Comparison of both strategies at the end of follow-up.
Six months after inclusion of the patient
Change of NYHA functional class
Time Frame: Six months after inclusion of the patient
Comparison of both strategies at the end of follow-up.
Six months after inclusion of the patient
Change of 6-minutes walking test [6MWT] distance.
Time Frame: Six months after inclusion of the patient
Comparison of both strategies at the end of follow-up.
Six months after inclusion of the patient
Evolution of ATTR-CM stages
Time Frame: Six months after inclusion of the patient
Comparison of both strategies at the end of follow-up.
Six months after inclusion of the patient
Changes in prognostic biomarkers: atrial natriuretic peptide levels (brain natriuretic peptide [BNP] and/or N-terminal-pro-brain natriuretic peptide [NT-proBNP]) and troponin levels (troponin T [TnT] and/or troponin I [TnI]).
Time Frame: Six months after inclusion of the patient
Comparison of both strategies at the end of follow-up.
Six months after inclusion of the patient
Improvement of patient reported experience measures such as IEXPAC questionnaire (Instrumento de Evaluación de la eXperiencia del PAciente Crónico) or Evaluation Tool of the Chronic Patient Experience and patient satisfaction (Net Promoter Score [NPS]).
Time Frame: Six months after inclusion of the patient
Comparison of both strategies at the end of follow-up.
Six months after inclusion of the patient

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Sergi Yun Viladomat, MD, Hospital Universitari de Bellvitge

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Estimated)

December 1, 2024

Primary Completion (Estimated)

March 15, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

March 15, 2026

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

July 1, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 8, 2024

First Posted (Actual)

July 12, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

October 23, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 21, 2024

Last Verified

July 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Heart Failure

Clinical Trials on mHealth

Subscribe