Lung Ultrasound Morphology Patterns Predict Weaning Outcomes

July 25, 2024 updated by: Shanghai Zhongshan Hospital

The Impact of Lung Ultrasound Morphology Patterns on Treatment Response and Weaning Outcomes in High-Risk Mechanically Ventilated Patients

This prospective observational study aims to investigate the impact of lung ultrasound morphology patterns on treatment response and weaning outcomes in high-risk mechanically ventilated patients. The study will be conducted in the intensive care unit (ICU) and will include patients who have been on mechanical ventilation for over 24 hours, are at high risk for reintubation due to age (>65 years) or underlying conditions (chronic heart or lung disease), and have a Lung Ultrasound Score (LUS) >13.

Patients will be stratified into two groups based on their lung ultrasound patterns: localized tissue-like patterns (TLP) and diffuse B-lines (DBP). Daily lung ultrasound examinations will be performed, and patients will receive targeted clinical interventions based on their ultrasound findings, such as lung recruitment maneuvers, positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) ventilation, prone positioning, pleural effusion drainage, antibiotics for pneumonia, and strategies for achieving negative fluid balance.

The primary outcome will be the change in Lung Recruitment Score (LRS) between the TLP and DBP groups, which assesses lung recruitment efficiency. Secondary outcomes will include the rate of weaning failure, duration of mechanical ventilation, ICU mortality, total ICU stay duration, and PaO2/FiO2 ratio before and after the spontaneous breathing trial (SBT).

This study aims to provide insights into the utility of lung ultrasound morphology patterns in guiding clinical interventions and predicting weaning outcomes in high-risk mechanically ventilated patients, potentially leading to improved patient care and outcomes in the ICU setting.

Study Overview

Status

Recruiting

Conditions

Detailed Description

This prospective observational study, titled "Lung Ultrasound Morphology Patterns Predict Weaning Outcomes (LUMP-WO)," aims to investigate the impact of lung ultrasound morphology patterns on treatment response and weaning outcomes in high-risk mechanically ventilated patients. The study will be conducted in the intensive care unit (ICU) of a tertiary care hospital.

Inclusion criteria for the study are: (1) mechanical ventilation for over 24 hours before the first spontaneous breathing trial, (2) high risk for reintubation due to age (>65 years) or underlying conditions (chronic heart disease or chronic lung disease), and (3) complete ultrasound data and initial LUS score >13. Exclusion criteria include: (1) age under 18 years, pregnancy, mechanical ventilation duration less than 24 hours, or diaphragmatic dysfunction; (2) low risk of extubation failure; (3) peripheral neuromuscular disorders; or (4) do-not-reintubate order at the first spontaneous breathing trial.

Patients will undergo daily lung ultrasound examinations performed by blinded investigators. Each lung will be scanned in six regions, and ultrasound findings will be categorized into four aeration patterns: normal (N-score 0), moderate (B1-lines score 1), severe (B2-lines score 2), and consolidation (C-score 3). The global LUS score will range from 0 to 36. Patients will be grouped into TLP if they exhibit a tissue-like pattern in any region or DBP if they display diffuse B-lines and shred signs in most regions.

Patients will receive standard medical care and targeted interventions based on their lung ultrasound findings. Lung recruitment maneuvers, PEEP ventilation, prone positioning, pleural effusion drainage, antibiotics for pneumonia, and strategies for achieving negative fluid balance will be utilized as appropriate. Weaning criteria will be assessed daily, and the Spontaneous Breathing Test (SBT) will be conducted using a T-tube or mechanical ventilation with low PEEP and pressure support.

The primary outcome will be the change in Lung Recruitment Score (LRS) between the TLP and DBP groups. Secondary outcomes will include the rate of weaning failure, duration of mechanical ventilation, ICU mortality, total ICU stay duration, and PaO2/FiO2 ratio before and after the SBT.

Data will be analyzed using appropriate statistical tests, and univariate and multivariate regression analyses will be utilized to identify risk factors associated with weaning outcomes.

This study aims to provide valuable insights into the utility of lung ultrasound morphology patterns in guiding clinical interventions and predicting weaning outcomes in high-risk mechanically ventilated patients. The findings may contribute to the development of personalized management strategies and improved patient outcomes in the ICU setting. The study's results may also help in the early identification of patients at risk of weaning failure, allowing for timely interventions and resource allocation.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Estimated)

100

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

The study will be retrospective. Based on lung ultrasound morphology patterns, patients will be stratified into localized tissue-like patterns (TLP) and diffuse B-lines (DBP) groups. The study will enroll a diverse population to ensure generalizability and comprehensively analyze the relationship between lung ultrasound morphology patterns, treatment response, and weaning outcomes.

Description

Inclusion criteria:(1) age ≥18 years, (2) on mechanical ventilation >24 hours before the first spontaneous breathing trial, (3) high risk for reintubation due to age (>65 years) or chronic heart or lung disease, and (4) complete ultrasound data and initial LUS >13.

Exclusion criteria:(1) age under 18 years, pregnancy, mechanical ventilation duration less than 24 hours, or diaphragmatic dysfunction; (2) low risk of extubation failure; (3) peripheral neuromuscular disorders; or (4) do-not-reintubate order at the first spontaneous breathing trial.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
TLP group
Patients were grouped into TLP if they exhibited a tissue-like pattern in any region
Two blinded investigators conducted daily lung ultrasound examinations. Each lung was scanned in six regions, categorizing ultrasound findings into four aeration patterns: normal (N-score 0), moderate (B1-lines score 1), severe (B2-lines score 2), and consolidation (C-score 3). The global LUS score ranged from 0 to 36. Patients were grouped into TLP if they exhibited a tissue-like pattern in any region or DBP if they displayed diffuse B-lines and shred signs in most regions. Localized TLPs indicated concentrated areas of non-aeration.
DBP group
Patients were grouped into DBP if they displayed diffuse B-lines and shred signs in most regions.
Two blinded investigators conducted daily lung ultrasound examinations. Each lung was scanned in six regions, categorizing ultrasound findings into four aeration patterns: normal (N-score 0), moderate (B1-lines score 1), severe (B2-lines score 2), and consolidation (C-score 3). The global LUS score ranged from 0 to 36. Patients were grouped into TLP if they exhibited a tissue-like pattern in any region or DBP if they displayed diffuse B-lines and shred signs in most regions. Localized TLPs indicated concentrated areas of non-aeration.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
LRS
Time Frame: through study completion,up to 28 days
The primary endpoint of the study was the change in Lung Recruitment Score (LRS) between the TLP and DBP groups. LRS assesses lung recruitment efficiency, assigning positive scores for reaeration and negative scores for loss of aeration (
through study completion,up to 28 days

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
weaning failure rates
Time Frame: through study completion,up to 28 days
defined as inability to successfully complete a spontaneous breathing trial, need for mechanical ventilation reintroduction within 48 hours post-weaning, or mortality related to weaning.
through study completion,up to 28 days
duration of mechanical ventilation
Time Frame: through study completion,up to 28 days
the total number of days or hours a patient receives invasive mechanical ventilation support
through study completion,up to 28 days
ICU mortality
Time Frame: through study completion,up to 28 days
the proportion of patients who die during their stay in the intensive care unit (ICU).
through study completion,up to 28 days
total ICU stay duration
Time Frame: through study completion,up to 28 days
the number of days a patient remains in the ICU from admission to discharge, transfer to another unit, or death.
through study completion,up to 28 days
PaO2/FiO2 ratio before and after the spontaneous breathing trial (SBT)
Time Frame: through study completion,up to 28 days
The PaO2/FiO2 ratio will be calculated by dividing the partial pressure of arterial oxygen (PaO2) by the fraction of inspired oxygen (FiO2). Measurements will be taken at two time points: (1) immediately before the start of the SBT and (2) at the end of the SBT or at the time of SBT failure.
through study completion,up to 28 days

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Chair: Ming Zhong, Ph.D, Fudan University

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

September 1, 2021

Primary Completion (Estimated)

December 30, 2025

Study Completion (Estimated)

December 30, 2025

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

July 15, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 25, 2024

First Posted (Actual)

July 26, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

July 26, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 25, 2024

Last Verified

July 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Other Study ID Numbers

  • LUMP-WO

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Plan Description

The individual participant data (IPD) sharing plan for this study will involve making specific datasets available to other researchers upon request and after the publication of the primary study results. The IPD to be shared will include de-identified data on patient demographics, clinical characteristics, lung ultrasound findings, treatment interventions, and outcomes, such as the duration of mechanical ventilation, ICU mortality, total ICU stay duration, and PaO2/FiO2 ratio before and after the spontaneous breathing trial (SBT).

IPD Sharing Time Frame

After the publication of the primary study results, the IPD will be available for request by other researchers for a period of 6 to 36 months.

IPD Sharing Access Criteria

Researchers interested in obtaining the IPD must submit a written application, detailing the research purpose, proposed analysis plan, and data usage and protection plan. All applications will be reviewed by the research team to ensure that the proposed research is consistent with the informed consent provided by the original study participants and complies with relevant ethical and regulatory requirements. Access to the IPD may require the execution of a data use agreement to stipulate the terms of data usage, storage, sharing, etc.

IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type

  • STUDY_PROTOCOL

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Retrospective

Clinical Trials on Lung Ultrasound Morphology Patterns

Subscribe