- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT06525701
Surgeon Core-strengthening Program as a Modifier for Exertion Associated With Vaginal Surgery (SCORE)
September 2, 2025 updated by: Marian G. Acevedo Alvarez, Loyola University
Surgeon Core-strengthening Program as a Modifier for Exertion Associated With Vaginal Surgery: the SCORE Randomized Controlled Trial
Work-related musculoskeletal pain and injury is a growing concern in surgery.
Vaginal surgery has unique ergonomic risks, but no studies have addressed the potential for an exercise regimen to reduce physical strain by vaginal surgeons
Study Overview
Status
Completed
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Surgical ergonomics is a burgeoning field, spurred by the recognition of the high prevalence of work-related musculoskeletal pain and injury in practicing surgeons including obstetrician/gynecologists.
Surgery is often a demanding physical task, and the muscles and joints that are stressed vary by the surgical approach.
Vaginal surgery has unique ergonomic challenges, particularly for assistants who may need to laterally bend their torsos to visualize the surgical field while still holding retractors.
This is often a compromising physical position for the back, the shoulders, and sometimes the neck which increases the risk of acute or chronic musculoskeletal injury.
The risk of injury can be thought of as a discrepancy between the demands of the task and the individual's physical capabilities.
Surgeons' injury risk may be decreased if their physical capabilities can be improved through exercise.
Most existing publications on surgical ergonomics have focused on raising awareness and on environmental changes such as optimizing surgeon posture during the case or introducing micro-breaks and stretching.
Few publications have assessed a structured exercise program with the goal of decreasing surgeon pain or fatigue during and after surgery.
To our knowledge, no studies have addressed this in vaginal surgery.
Study Type
Interventional
Enrollment (Actual)
18
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.
Study Locations
-
-
Illinois
-
Maywood, Illinois, United States, 60153
- Loyola University Medical Center
-
-
Participation Criteria
Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Child
- Adult
- Older Adult
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Yes
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
Participant: ob/gyn resident or urology resident or urogyn fellow or urogyn attending Case: vaginal prolapse surgery >2 hours in length
Exclusion Criteria:
Participant:
- Actively in physical therapy
- Joint surgery or joint injury within last 12 weeks
- Pregnant
- Less than 6 weeks postpartum
Case:
- Vaginal surgery <2 hours in length
- Non-prolapse vaginal surgery
Study Plan
This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Prevention
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Single
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Exercise Group
Participants randomized to the exercise group will be asked to perform the SCORE workout two times each week for 4 weeks prior to their urogynecology rotation and for 4 weeks during the rotation.
|
SCORE workout: eight exercises done sequentially: bicycles, balancing dog, windshield wipers, three-point plank, kayaker, super push-ups, bridge, and side plank.
These workouts are modified from the core regimen recommended by Steve House and Scott Johnston in their book Training for the New Alpinism: A Manual for the Climber as Athlete (House 2014).
Each exercise is done until fatigue: when the individual is no longer able to complete the exercise with good form.
The participant then rests for approximately thirty to sixty seconds before beginning the next exercise.
Passive stretching can be performed during the rest periods.
The workout is complete at twenty minutes.
Those individuals who complete all eight exercises in less than twenty minutes begin again with the first exercise (bicycles) and continue until reaching twenty minutes.
The workout is thus adaptive-seamlessly increasing in repetitions as an individual's strength and endurance increase.
No additional exercises or tasks are requested of control participants.
Control group participants will perform or not perform exercise as they otherwise would outside of the study.
|
|
Active Comparator: Control Group
No additional exercises or tasks are requested of control participants.
Control group participants will perform or not perform exercise as they otherwise would outside of the study
|
SCORE workout: eight exercises done sequentially: bicycles, balancing dog, windshield wipers, three-point plank, kayaker, super push-ups, bridge, and side plank.
These workouts are modified from the core regimen recommended by Steve House and Scott Johnston in their book Training for the New Alpinism: A Manual for the Climber as Athlete (House 2014).
Each exercise is done until fatigue: when the individual is no longer able to complete the exercise with good form.
The participant then rests for approximately thirty to sixty seconds before beginning the next exercise.
Passive stretching can be performed during the rest periods.
The workout is complete at twenty minutes.
Those individuals who complete all eight exercises in less than twenty minutes begin again with the first exercise (bicycles) and continue until reaching twenty minutes.
The workout is thus adaptive-seamlessly increasing in repetitions as an individual's strength and endurance increase.
No additional exercises or tasks are requested of control participants.
Control group participants will perform or not perform exercise as they otherwise would outside of the study.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
The effect of a core-strengthening program on surgeons' physical exertion during and after vaginal prolapse surgery using the Borg rating of perceived exertion (Borg CR10). To determine the effect of a core-strengthening program on surgeon
Time Frame: 8-12 weeks
|
The effect of a core-strengthening program on surgeons' physical exertion during and after vaginal prolapse surgery as measured by the Borg Category Ratio (CR-10).
The Borg Category Ratio scale is a self-reported tool that describes level of exertion and ranges from 0-10 where larger numbers represent greater exertion.
|
8-12 weeks
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
To describe the baseline core strength in a population of vaginal surgeons using the validated Core Score
Time Frame: 8-12 weeks
|
• Core Score: The Core Score ranges from 0-12 where higher scores indicate better performance on core-related exercises.
|
8-12 weeks
|
|
To describe the execise habits and activity level in a populationa of vaginal surgeons using activity tracker data and the International Physical Activity Questionnaire.
Time Frame: 8-12 weeks
|
• International Physical Activity Questionnaire-Short Form (IPAQ-SF): Participant responses on time spent walking, doing moderate exercise, and doing vigorous exercise are first compared to a rubric for the categorical score.
The categorical score ranges 1-3 where 1 is "inactive" and 3 is "health-enhancing physical activity".
Participant responses are also used to calculate the weekly metabolic equivalent (MET) minutes where a higher number indicates more time spent being physically active.
|
8-12 weeks
|
|
To measure the effect of a core-strengthening program on surgeons' pain during and after vaginal prolapse surgery using the PROMIS Pain Intensity-Short Form (PI-SF) and body diagrams.
Time Frame: 8-12 weeks
|
• PROMIS Pain Intensity-Short Form (PI-SF): The raw score ranges from 3-15 where higher scores indicate more pain.
Raw scores are converted to t-scores where a t-score of 50 represents the average in the United States population.
|
8-12 weeks
|
|
To measure objective and subjective change in core strength after completion of the core-strengthening program using the Core Score and Patient Global Impression of Improvement (PGI-I).
Time Frame: 8-12 weeks
|
• Patient Global Impression of Improvement (PGI-I): Lower Patient Global Impression of Improvement scores indicate more improvement.
PGI-I ranges from 1 ("very much better") to 7 ("very much worse").
|
8-12 weeks
|
Collaborators and Investigators
This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.
Sponsor
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Marian Acevedo-Alvarez, MD, Loyola Medical Center
Publications and helpful links
The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.
General Publications
- Craig CL, Marshall AL, Sjostrom M, Bauman AE, Booth ML, Ainsworth BE, Pratt M, Ekelund U, Yngve A, Sallis JF, Oja P. International physical activity questionnaire: 12-country reliability and validity. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2003 Aug;35(8):1381-95. doi: 10.1249/01.MSS.0000078924.61453.FB.
- Yalcin I, Bump RC. Validation of two global impression questionnaires for incontinence. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2003 Jul;189(1):98-101. doi: 10.1067/mob.2003.379.
- Moher D, Hopewell S, Schulz KF, Montori V, Gotzsche PC, Devereaux PJ, Elbourne D, Egger M, Altman DG; CONSORT. CONSORT 2010 explanation and elaboration: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials. Int J Surg. 2012;10(1):28-55. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2011.10.001. Epub 2011 Oct 12.
- Rodrigues H, Cobucci R, Oliveira A, Cabral JV, Medeiros L, Gurgel K, Souza T, Goncalves AK. Burnout syndrome among medical residents: A systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS One. 2018 Nov 12;13(11):e0206840. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0206840. eCollection 2018.
- Friedrich J, Brakke R, Akuthota V, Sullivan W. Reliability and Practicality of the Core Score: Four Dynamic Core Stability Tests Performed in a Physician Office Setting. Clin J Sport Med. 2017 Jul;27(4):409-414. doi: 10.1097/JSM.0000000000000366.
- Henriksen A, Haugen Mikalsen M, Woldaregay AZ, Muzny M, Hartvigsen G, Hopstock LA, Grimsgaard S. Using Fitness Trackers and Smartwatches to Measure Physical Activity in Research: Analysis of Consumer Wrist-Worn Wearables. J Med Internet Res. 2018 Mar 22;20(3):e110. doi: 10.2196/jmir.9157.
- Yurteri-Kaplan LA, Park AJ. Surgical Ergonomics and Preventing Work-Related Musculoskeletal Disorders. Obstet Gynecol. 2023 Mar 1;141(3):455-462. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000005079. Epub 2023 Feb 2. No abstract available.
- Giagio S, Volpe G, Pillastrini P, Gasparre G, Frizziero A, Squizzato F. A Preventive Program for Work-related Musculoskeletal Disorders Among Surgeons: Outcomes of a Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial. Ann Surg. 2019 Dec;270(6):969-975. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000003199.
- Al Reshidi FS. Level of Physical Activity of Physicians Among Residency Training Program At Prince Sultan Military Medical City, Riyadh, KSA 2014. Int J Health Sci (Qassim). 2016 Jan;10(1):39-47. doi: 10.12816/0031215.
- Bertolaccini L, Viti A, Terzi A. Ergon-trial: ergonomic evaluation of single-port access versus three-port access video-assisted thoracic surgery. Surg Endosc. 2015 Oct;29(10):2934-40. doi: 10.1007/s00464-014-4024-6. Epub 2014 Dec 17.
- Cruz-Montecinos C, Bustamante A, Candia-Gonzalez M, Gonzalez-Bravo C, Gallardo-Molina P, Andersen LL, Calatayud J. Perceived physical exertion is a good indicator of neuromuscular fatigue for the core muscles. J Electromyogr Kinesiol. 2019 Dec;49:102360. doi: 10.1016/j.jelekin.2019.102360. Epub 2019 Sep 28.
- Choi SH, Kuchta K, Rojas A, Mehdi SA, Ramirez Barriga M, Hays S, Talamonti MS, Hogg ME. Residents perform better technically, have less stress and workload, and prefer robotic to laparoscopic technique during inanimate simulation. Surg Endosc. 2023 Sep;37(9):7230-7237. doi: 10.1007/s00464-023-10216-5. Epub 2023 Jul 3.
- Dairywala MI, Gupta S, Salna M, Nguyen TC. Surgeon Strength: Ergonomics and Strength Training in Cardiothoracic Surgery. Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2022 Winter;34(4):1220-1229. doi: 10.1053/j.semtcvs.2021.09.015. Epub 2021 Sep 29.
- Jo D, Bilodeau M. Rating of perceived exertion (RPE) in studies of fatigue-induced postural control alterations in healthy adults: Scoping review of quantitative evidence. Gait Posture. 2021 Oct;90:167-178. doi: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2021.08.015. Epub 2021 Aug 25.
- Keohane DM, McGillivary NA, Daly B. Physical activity levels and perceived barriers to exercise participation in Irish General Practitioners and General Practice trainees. Ir Med J. 2018 Feb 9;111(2):690.
- Kopkash K, Novak K, Murphy R, Deliere A, Kuchta K, Rabbitt S, Pesce C, Winchester D, Yao K. Improving the Breast Surgeon's Ergonomic Workload for Nipple-Sparing Mastectomies Using Exercise and Operating Room Positioning Protocol. Ann Surg Oncol. 2021 Oct;28(10):5698-5706. doi: 10.1245/s10434-021-10447-7. Epub 2021 Jul 27.
- Kromberg LS, Kildebro NV, Mortensen LQ, Amirian I, Rosenberg J. Microbreaks in Laparoscopic Appendectomy have No Effect on Surgeons' Performance and Well-being. J Surg Res. 2020 Jul;251:1-5. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2020.01.007. Epub 2020 Feb 21.
- Lentz TA, Rhon DI, George SZ. Predicting Opioid Use, Increased Health Care Utilization and High Costs for Musculoskeletal Pain: What Factors Mediate Pain Intensity and Disability? J Pain. 2020 Jan-Feb;21(1-2):135-145. doi: 10.1016/j.jpain.2019.06.004. Epub 2019 Jun 13.
- Meltzer AJ, Hallbeck MS, Morrow MM, Lowndes BR, Davila VJ, Stone WM, Money SR. Measuring Ergonomic Risk in Operating Surgeons by Using Wearable Technology. JAMA Surg. 2020 May 1;155(5):444-446. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2019.6384.
- Parry DA, Oeppen RS, Amin MSA, Brennan PA. Could exercise improve mental health and cognitive skills for surgeons and other healthcare professionals? Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2018 Jun;56(5):367-370. doi: 10.1016/j.bjoms.2018.03.005. Epub 2018 Apr 9.
- Selvaraj CS, Abdullah N. Physically active primary care doctors are more likely to offer exercise counselling to patients with cardiovascular diseases: a cross-sectional study. BMC Prim Care. 2022 Mar 29;23(1):59. doi: 10.1186/s12875-022-01657-3.
- Stone AA, Broderick JE, Junghaenel DU, Schneider S, Schwartz JE. PROMIS fatigue, pain intensity, pain interference, pain behavior, physical function, depression, anxiety, and anger scales demonstrate ecological validity. J Clin Epidemiol. 2016 Jun;74:194-206. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2015.08.029. Epub 2015 Nov 25.
- Suija K, Pechter U, Maaroos J, Kalda R, Ratsep A, Oona M, Maaroos HI. Physical activity of Estonian family doctors and their counselling for a healthy lifestyle: a cross-sectional study. BMC Fam Pract. 2010 Jun 18;11:48. doi: 10.1186/1471-2296-11-48.
- Whittaker RL, Sonne MW, Potvin JR. Ratings of perceived fatigue predict fatigue induced declines in muscle strength during tasks with different distributions of effort and recovery. J Electromyogr Kinesiol. 2019 Aug;47:88-95. doi: 10.1016/j.jelekin.2019.05.012. Epub 2019 May 18.
- Winters JN, Sommer NZ, Romanelli MR, Marschik C, Hulcher L, Cutler BJ. Stretching and Strength Training to Improve Postural Ergonomics and Endurance in the Operating Room. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2020 May 13;8(5):e2810. doi: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000002810. eCollection 2020 May.
- Allespach H, Sussman M, Bolanos J, Atri E, Schulman CI. Practice Longer and Stronger: Maximizing the Physical Well-Being of Surgical Residents with Targeted Ergonomics Training. J Surg Educ. 2020 Sep-Oct;77(5):1024-1027. doi: 10.1016/j.jsurg.2020.04.001. Epub 2020 Aug 4.
Study record dates
These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
August 12, 2024
Primary Completion (Actual)
July 1, 2025
Study Completion (Actual)
July 1, 2025
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
July 24, 2024
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
July 26, 2024
First Posted (Actual)
July 29, 2024
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Estimated)
September 9, 2025
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
September 2, 2025
Last Verified
September 1, 2025
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- 218292
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
NO
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
No
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Musculoskeletal Pain
-
Sykehuset i Vestfold HFCompletedBack Pain | Musculoskeletal Pain | Chronic Pain | Musculoskeletal Diseases or Conditions | Pain, Chronic | Musculoskeletal Disorder | Musculoskeletal Neck PainNorway
-
University of Missouri, Kansas CityTerminatedOrthopaedic Related Pain (Musculoskeletal Pain)United States
-
Massachusetts General HospitalOrthopaedic Trauma AssociationCompleted
-
Henry M. Jackson Foundation for the Advancement...Indiana Institute for Medical ResearchRecruitingMusic Therapy | Veterans | Chronic Musculoskeletal PainUnited States
-
Wayne State UniversityUniversity of Southern CaliforniaCompleted
-
Massachusetts General HospitalMcMaster UniversityRecruitingPain | Pilot Study | Opioid | Orthopaedic Related Pain (Musculoskeletal Pain)United States
-
University of North Carolina, Chapel HillYale University; Duke University; National Institute on Aging (NIA); Indiana University and other collaboratorsCompletedChronic Pain | Acute Musculoskeletal PainUnited States
-
Atlas UniversityNot yet recruitingOccupational Diseases | Neck Pain | Endodontics | Dentistry | Neck Pain Musculoskeletal | Musculoskeletal Disorder of the Neck | Occupational Musculoskeletal Disorders | Musculoskeletal Assessment | Musculoskeletal Disorders (MSDs)Turkey (Türkiye)
-
Uppsala UniversityDalarna County Council, Sweden; Center for Clinical Research Dalarna, Sweden; REHSAM, SwedenTerminatedMusculoskeletal Neck Pain | Musculoskeletal Shoulder PainSweden
Clinical Trials on Execise Group
-
Tanta UniversityCompletedChildren | Dexmedetomidine | Adenotonsillectomy | MidazolamEgypt
-
Tanta UniversityNot yet recruitingMelatonin | Doxorubicin | Vitamin D Concentration | Breast Cancer Patients DiagnosedEgypt
-
Charite University, Berlin, GermanyDepartment of Neurology, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Germany; Department...Unknown
-
University of Sao Paulo General HospitalCompletedOsteoarthritis, Knee
-
National Yang Ming Chiao Tung UniversityCompleted
-
Cairo UniversityCompleted
-
Al-Azhar UniversityCompleted
-
Zagazig UniversityCompleted
-
Riphah International UniversityCompleted
-
Chang Gung UniversityCompleted