Virtual Human Technology for Patients With Chronic Pain

March 11, 2024 updated by: Mark A. Lumley, Wayne State University

Virtual Human Technology for Patients With Chronic Pain: Experimental Study of Pain Neuroscience and Emotional Disclosure

The experimental study compares three virtual human interviews of patients with chronic musculoskeletal pain: Emotional disclosure and brain, emotional disclosure only, basic information control. Effects on attitudes and clinical outcomes at 1-month follow-up are assessed.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Emotional disclosure about stressors and other private experiences has been found to be helpful for some people with chronic musculoskeletal pain. Also, helping patients understand the role of the brain in pain has been helpful. We have developed a virtual human interviewer to help patients talk about their pain and their lives. We will conduct an experimental study to compare the effects of several different types of VH interviews. Patients with chronic pain will be randomized to receive one of three VH interviews: emotional disclosure and brain education; emotional disclosure alone; or a control basic pain interview. Patients will be assessed at baseline and 1-month follow-up on a range of attitudinal and clinical measures to determine how these different interviews affect outcomes.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

94

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • California
      • Los Angeles, California, United States, 90089-3332
        • University of Southern California Center for Self-report Science

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Chronic musculoskeletal Pain

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Non-English speaking

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Basic Science
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Emotional Disclosure and Brain Education
Patients are interviewed about stress and other emotional issues and are educated about how emotions and the brain influence pain.
Patients are interviewed about a number of aspects of their lives (stress, other illnesses, personality, adverse childhood experiences), and these are explored as part of education of the brain's role in their pain.
Active Comparator: Emotional Disclosure only
Patients are interviewed about stress and other emotional issues only.
Patients are interviewed about a number of aspects of their lives, but without brain education
Placebo Comparator: Pain Information Control
Patients are interviewed about their pain history and experience.
Patients are interviewed about their pain history and other basic, non-disclosure information about their health.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Pain Intensity
Time Frame: Change from Baseline to 1-month follow-up
Brief Pain Inventory (average of the 4 pain intensity rating items: highest, lowest, average, now). Range: 0.0 to 10.0 (higher = more severe pain)
Change from Baseline to 1-month follow-up

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Pain Interference
Time Frame: Change from Baseline to 1-month follow-up
Brief Pain Inventory (7 interference items; range: 0.0 to 10.0; higher = more interference)
Change from Baseline to 1-month follow-up
Pain Stages of Change Questionnaire
Time Frame: Change from Baseline to 1-month follow-up
Pain Stages of Change Questionnaire assesses readiness / motivation to engage in pain self-management. Sum of subscales of Contemplation + Action + Maintenance - Precontemplation; Range = 0 to 12; higher scores = more readiness to change
Change from Baseline to 1-month follow-up
Pain Catastrophizing Scale
Time Frame: Change from Baseline to 1-month follow-up
Pain catastrophizing (range: 0.0 to 4.0; higher scores = more catastrophizing)
Change from Baseline to 1-month follow-up
Emotional Distress
Time Frame: Change from Baseline to 1-month follow-up
Self-rating of how "depressed," "anxious," "angry," and "guilty" participant was during last week on 0 to 4 scale. Ratings averaged; higher means = more distress
Change from Baseline to 1-month follow-up

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Readiness / motivation to engage in pain self-management (Subscales of Precontemplation, Contemplation, Action, Maintenance; Range on each subscale: 1.0 to 5.0; higher scores = more endorsement of that stage of change)
Time Frame: Baseline to 1-month follow-up
Pain Stages of Change Questionnaire
Baseline to 1-month follow-up
Pain attitudes (Subscales of Control, Medication use, Disability, Emotion, Harm, Brain attributions, Psychological attributions; range 0.0 to 4.0; higher scores indicate more endorsement of each attitude)
Time Frame: Baseline to 1-month follow-up
Survey of Pain Attitudes
Baseline to 1-month follow-up
Pain catastrophizing (range: 0.0 to 4.0; higher scores = more catastrophizing)
Time Frame: Baseline to 1-month follow-up
Pain Catastrophizing Scale
Baseline to 1-month follow-up
Opioid use (range 0 to 6; higher scores = more opioid misuse)
Time Frame: Baseline to 1-month follow-up
Opioid Use Questionnaire
Baseline to 1-month follow-up

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Doerte U Junghaenel, PhD, University of Southern California
  • Principal Investigator: Mark A Lumley, PhD, Wayne State University

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

February 10, 2021

Primary Completion (Actual)

August 1, 2021

Study Completion (Actual)

August 1, 2021

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

April 13, 2020

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 13, 2020

First Posted (Actual)

April 16, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 12, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 11, 2024

Last Verified

March 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • UP-19-00230

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Plan Description

Full, anonymized data set

IPD Sharing Time Frame

Starting 1 year after study end, for 5 years.

IPD Sharing Access Criteria

Contact the study PI

IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type

  • STUDY_PROTOCOL
  • SAP
  • ICF

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Chronic Musculoskeletal Pain

Clinical Trials on Emotional Disclosure and Brain Education

3
Subscribe