The Role of Maintaining External Carotid Artery Flow in Graft Interposition After Carotid Endarterectomy (AGICS)

July 25, 2024 updated by: Slobodan Pesic, Institute for Cardiovascular Diseases "Dedinje"
Analyzing results of carotid graft interposition with and without flow preservation through external carotid artery after endarterectomy.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Surgical and endovascular treatment have been shown as effective treatment modalities in symptomatic and asymptomatic patients at high risk of stroke on medical therapy with significant carotid artery stenosis. Eversion carotid endarterectomy (eCEA) has proven effective as a surgical treatment modality. In highly selected instances carotid bypass may be indicated as a bailout procedure or primarily as a preoperatively planned maneuver. Usually, the decision for substitution of carotid bifurcation with a synthetic graft is made due to an extensive, severe atherosclerotic process on the distal part of the extracranial internal carotid artery, the presence of uncontrollable atherosclerotic plaque after endarterectomy, and in cases when an exceptionally thin artery wall remains after endarterectomy.

Several techniques have been described for substituting carotid bifurcation with a synthetic graft. The most common technique involves complete resection and excision of the carotid bifurcation and reconstruction with graft interposition between the undiseased segment of the common carotid artery (CCA) proximally and the internal carotid artery (ICA) distally by creating proximal and distal end-to-end anastomoses. This technique requires ligation and exclusion of the external carotid (ECA) and the superior thyroid artery from circulation. The less common techniques that preserve flow through the external carotid artery are performed as a primary option for treatment without previous endarterectomy and are seldom applied. Currently, there are no recommendations regarding the administration of carotid bypass, nor comparisons of these techniques.

In this study, the investigators are comparing a technique with graft interposition between endarterectomized CCA (creation of side-to-end anastomosis) and the distal segment of the ICA (end-to-end anastomosis) after failure of eCEA to provide technical success with the described common interposition by end-to-end anastomoses proximally and distally. Therefore, the role of flow preservation through the ECA could be defined.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Estimated)

250

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

      • Belgrade, Serbia, 11000
        • Recruiting
        • Institute for Cardiovascular Diseases Dedinje
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Patients who underwent carotid artery surgery due to atherosclerotic symptomatic and asymptomatic disease had graft interposition conducted due to unsuccessful endarterectomy.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • symptomatic carotid stenosis (> 50%)
  • unilateral asymptomatic carotid stenosis (> 60%)
  • bilateral asymptomatic carotid stenosis (> 60%)

Exclusion Criteria:

  • carotid restenosis
  • "major surgery" in previous 6 months
  • previous brain trauma or surgery
  • malignant disease
  • epilepsy
  • carotid artery aneurysm

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
ECA flow preserved group
Patients with carotid graft interposition after endarterectomy of the common carotid artery and external carotid artery with preserved flow through the external carotid artery by side-to-end proximal anastomosis.
In patients with extensive atherosclerotic carotid disease, when endarterectomy isn't feasible, replacement of the carotid artery with a graft is needed. Graft interposition can be performed either by end-to-end proximal and distal anastomoses in the undiseased common and internal carotid artery with ligation of the external carotid artery, or by side-to-end proximal anastomosis on the origin of the internal carotid artery and end-to-end distal anastomosis on the internal carotid artery with flow preservation in the external carotid artery.
Other Names:
  • Carotid artery graft replacement
  • Carotid replacement with Dacron graft
Ligated ECA group
Patients with carotid graft interposition and end-to-end anastomoses on the undiseased segments of the common (proximally) and internal (distally) carotid artery, with ligation of the external carotid artery.
In patients with extensive atherosclerotic carotid disease, when endarterectomy isn't feasible, replacement of the carotid artery with a graft is needed. Graft interposition can be performed either by end-to-end proximal and distal anastomoses in the undiseased common and internal carotid artery with ligation of the external carotid artery, or by side-to-end proximal anastomosis on the origin of the internal carotid artery and end-to-end distal anastomosis on the internal carotid artery with flow preservation in the external carotid artery.
Other Names:
  • Carotid artery graft replacement
  • Carotid replacement with Dacron graft

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
periprocedural stroke and death
Time Frame: 30 days
onset of new neurological deficit or death during perioperative period
30 days
myocardial infarction
Time Frame: 30 days
development of new acute coronary events during perioperative period
30 days
stroke ipsilateral to the procedure
Time Frame: through study completion, an average of 2 years
development of new neurological events that are pathophysiological atributable to the operated side
through study completion, an average of 2 years

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
restenosis rate
Time Frame: through study completion, an average of 2 years
restenosis after graft placement diagnosed by color Doppler sonographic examination or by multiplanar detection computerized tomography angiography
through study completion, an average of 2 years
graft patency
Time Frame: through study completion, an average of 2 years
primary and primary assisted
through study completion, an average of 2 years
patient survival
Time Frame: through study completion, an average of 2 years
defining cause of death
through study completion, an average of 2 years

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Director: Srdjan Babic, MD PhD, Institute for Cardiovascular Diseases "Dedinje"

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

June 12, 2024

Primary Completion (Estimated)

October 30, 2024

Study Completion (Estimated)

December 30, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

July 20, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 25, 2024

First Posted (Actual)

July 30, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

July 30, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 25, 2024

Last Verified

July 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Stroke

Clinical Trials on Carotid graft interposition

Subscribe