Comparing Two Linkage-to-Care Models for Latinx Immigrant Patients : A Pilot Comparative Clinical Effectiveness Trial

July 28, 2024 updated by: Ann Cheney, University of California, Riverside

The goal of this randomized clinical comparative effectiveness trail is to compare the effects of patient navigator models on follow-up care in Latinx and Indigenous Mexican immigrant patient populations. The main question[s] it aims to answer [is/are]:

  • Participants randomized to PN-CHW compared to the PN-CS model will be more likely to follow through with follow-up care referrals
  • Trust will be a driving factor as to why PN-CHW will be a more effective intervention for the patient population.

Researchers will compare patients in a patient navigator community health worker (PN-CHW) intervention to those in a patient navigator clinical staff (PN-CS) intervention to see which model of linkage to care is more effective for follow-up care in the patient population.

Participants will be asked to:

  • Complete a baseline survey about healthcare access
  • Receive calls and text messages from either a CHW or clinical staff
  • Complete a follow up survey

Study Overview

Status

Not yet recruiting

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

The research project will be conducted at a free clinic that serves a primarily Spanish-speaking Latinx patient population in the Inland Southern California region. Patients in this study will be randomized to one of two intervention arms: Arm 1: PN model delivered by CHWs/promotoras and Arm 2: PN model delivered by clinic staff. CHWs who live in the region and work at the free clinic will deliver the PN model for Arm 1 participants. CHWs have a detailed knowledge of local health resources, as well as lived experience of the barriers patients in their community face when accessing healthcare services. Medical students who are volunteer clinic staff will deliver the PN model for Arm 2 participants. Medical students are the doctors in training who provide primary care services to patients at the CVFC under the supervision of well-established physicians. Baseline data and follow-up data at 12 weeks will be collected along with qualitative interviews with patients in both arms of the study.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

50

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • 1) live in the Coachella Valley, 2) 18 or older, 3) household income less than or equal to or below 200% of federal poverty guidelines, 4) do not currently have health insurance, and 5) have access to a telephone.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Do not speak English, Spanish or Purépecha (an indigenous dialect spoken among the Purépecha of Mexico).

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Health Services Research
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Patient Navigator/ Community Health Worker
The community health worker will contact the participant two days after their initial clinic visit. They will call the participant to offer support and counseling on accessing their follow-up visits with local healthcare system. Additionally, the PN will call 1 day prior to the scheduled appointment to offer support and information to the patient followed by a reminder text the morning of the appointment.
The patient navigator model is an evidence-based intervention to improve access to healthcare services.
Active Comparator: Patient Navigator/Clinic Staff
Clinic staff will contact the participant two days after their initial clinic visit. They will call the participant to offer support and counseling on accessing their follow-up visits with local healthcare system. Additionally, the clinic staff will call 1 day prior to the scheduled appointment to offer support and information to the patient followed by a reminder text the morning of the appointment.
The patient navigator model is an evidence-based intervention to improve access to healthcare services.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Follow up care
Time Frame: 12 weeks post randomization
Follow up care for referred healthcare need
12 weeks post randomization

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Trust in physicians
Time Frame: 12 weeks post randomization
Trust in physicians measured by 10-item physician trust Scale
12 weeks post randomization

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Ann M Cheney, PhD, Principal Investigator

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Estimated)

September 1, 2024

Primary Completion (Estimated)

June 30, 2025

Study Completion (Estimated)

December 31, 2025

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

July 28, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 28, 2024

First Posted (Actual)

July 31, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

July 31, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 28, 2024

Last Verified

July 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 30382

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Plan Description

De-identified data will be shared upon request to the study principal investigator.

IPD Sharing Time Frame

De-identified data will be available after the completion of main analysis and scientific dissemination.

IPD Sharing Access Criteria

Interested parties should contact the principal investigator at ann.cheney@medsch.ucr.edu

IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type

  • CSR

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Chronic Disease

Clinical Trials on Patient Navigator Model

Subscribe