Can Endotracheal Tube Fluctuation With Epigastric Compression Be Used as a Confirmation Method for Endotracheal Intubation?

August 4, 2024 updated by: kudret selki, Duzce University

Can the Fluctuation Observed in the Endotracheal Tube With Compression Applied to the Epigastric Region be Used as a Confirmation Method for Endotracheal Intubation?

Endotracheal intubation (ETE) may also need to be performed outside the hospital as advanced airway management. In such cases, facilities such as imaging methods, ultrasound or capnography may not be available and only traditional methods such as auscultation of lung sounds, auscultation of the epigastric region without hearing airflow, observation of chest expansion after ventilation, observation of water vapor in the tube may have to be used. Despite all these observational methods and equipment used, it is recommended to keep in mind that there may be errors and to try to provide confirmation with more than one method.

Especially in disaster situations where technological infrastructure is not available and sometimes outside the hospital, the use of traditional methods based on examination may be of vital importance. The traditional methods mentioned above are mostly used to detect tracheal localization and to exclude esophageal localization. In our observations in patients with cardiopulmonary arrest, the investigators noticed that in the case of esophageal placement of the tube, manual compression of the epigastric region produced a fluctuation in the tube and valved balloon caused by airflow. The investigators thought that this could be a method to confirm esophageal placement. The aim of this study was to investigate the usefulness of epigastric manual compression in the confirmation of esophageal placement of the tube.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

Patients who underwent ETE outside the hospital or in the first hour of arrival to the emergency department were evaluated after the procedure. Out-of-hospital ETE was performed by experienced paramedics working in the emergency ambulance service, and ETE in the emergency department was performed by emergency medicine residents or emergency medicine specialists with at least 2 years of emergency department experience. Out-of-hospital procedures were performed at the first visit to the emergency department, and procedures performed in the emergency department were confirmed by ETE immediately after the procedure.

Confirmation was performed single-blind by emergency medicine specialists with at least 5 years of experience, without knowing who performed the procedure and where (in or out of the hospital). Confirmation was performed by auscultation of lung sounds (from the anterior and lateral sides of both lungs, upper and lower zones), evaluation of equal participation of both thoraxes in breathing by inspection, auscultation of the epigastric region, placement of capnography, monitoring of water vapor in the tube, manual compression of the epigastric region at least three times and evaluation of fluctuation in the tube, and pulse oximetry monitoring.

Epigastric compression was performed by applying pressure to the epigastric region at least three times with the volar side of the intubated patient while the patient was ventilated with a balloon-valved mask. During this procedure, the fluctuation of the air and fluid in the stomach inside the esophageal tube can be observed and its sound can be heard. It can be applied from the first inhalation.

The ultrasonography (USG) procedure was evaluated by placing a linear ultrasound probe [SonoSite M-Turbo linear probe (13-6 MHz), Sonosite, Inc, Bothell, WA, USA] in the transverse position on the anterior side of the neck, just above the suprasternal notch, and observing the position of the tube (presence of a double path sign) and pleural sliding movement. While a single semicircular echogenic area is observed when the tube is in the trachea, a second semicircular echogenic area is observed when the tube is located in the esophagus. USG was performed immediately after the ETE procedure. In patients in whom double pathway sign was observed and pleural sliding motion was not observed, the patient was re-intubated by the experienced specialist performing USG. It was confirmed by USG again. These procedures were categorized as "failed".

partial endtidal carbon dioxide (PETCO2) measurement by capnography was performed using a mainstream EMMA® Capnograph (PHASEIN AB Svärdvägen, Danderyd, Sweden) for intubated patients. It was assessed by the detection of PETCO2 greater than 5 mmHg after five breaths and the appearance of a typical square waveform.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

78

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Düzce, Turkey
        • Duzce University

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Older than 18 years of age
  • Underwent ETE outside the hospital or within the first hour of arrival to the emergency department

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients in whom ETE was previously confirmed by USG or PETCO2,
  • Patients intubated at external centers
  • Patients who had known airway stenosis

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Diagnostic
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Other: Endotracheal intubation
Patients admitted to the emergency department between 01/05/2021 and 30/05/2022, who were older than 18 years of age and who underwent ETE outside the hospital or within the first hour of arrival to the emergency department were included in the study.
The first 40 successful and the first 40 unsuccessful ETE procedures were included in the study.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Confirmation with ultrasonography: Successful or Failed
Time Frame: 13 months

Fluctuation with Epigastric Compression: Yes or No

Failed Successful Failed

13 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Director: Mustafa Boğan, MD, Duzce University, School of Medicine, Emergency Department

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

February 18, 2021

Primary Completion (Actual)

March 4, 2023

Study Completion (Actual)

March 4, 2023

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

July 26, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 4, 2024

First Posted (Actual)

August 7, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

August 7, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 4, 2024

Last Verified

August 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • DuzceUniversityEM

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

IPD Plan Description

Data can be shared with those who request it.

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Intubation, Intratracheal

Clinical Trials on Endotracheal intubation

Subscribe