Learning and Retention of Tracheal Intubation by Medical Students: Comparison of Standard Intubation Teaching Against Video-guided Intubation Teaching.

Purpose: This study is designed to assess the impact of teaching tracheal intubation using video-guided feedback on the ability to perform and maintain this clinical skill by medical students.

Hypothesis: We hypothesise that, for novices, video-guided feedback provided during tracheal intubation will improve learning and retention of this clinical skill compared to standard teaching using direct visualization feedback.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

Introduction:

Competency in laryngoscopic tracheal intubation is a key skill to be developed during the training of medical students. Teaching this technical skill remains a challenge due to the fact that the laryngeal view is limited to one person at a time. Therefore, the feedback given during the procedure by the instructor to the student becomes limited, delayed and thus less efficient. This lack of efficiency could explain the poor success rates of tracheal intubations performed by medical students during the initial learning phase. Over the last ten years, new intubation devices incorporating optic fibers have been commercialized. These new technologies combined to video systems are now increasingly used for teaching purposes. Recent literature tends to show that this new approach could ease the learning process and increase the medical student's satisfaction towards the teaching of tracheal intubation.

Maintaining this knowledge and clinical skill can also be challenging especially for physicians who are not exposed to the intubation technique on a regular basis. Since tracheal intubation is a potentially lifesaving procedure, retention of this competency is crucial.

This study is designed to assess the impact of teaching tracheal intubation using video-guided feedback and the short and mid-term retention of the competency in a population of pregraduate medical students (clinical years 3 and 4).

Methods:

-Initial phase:

Medical students enrolled in this study will initially receive standardised training using a short video explaining the tracheal intubation technique. Then, they will be asked to intubate on mannequins for a short period of time (15 minutes).

A total of 18 medical students will be randomly assigned to the following groups:

  • Group V: to perform video-guided intubations on six patients under the supervision of an anaesthesiologist.
  • Group S: to perform tracheal intubation on six patients under the supervision of an anaesthesiologist using standard teaching technique (direct visualization).

Patients scheduled for elective surgery under general anaesthesia including neuromuscular blockade as part of their anaesthetic management will be considered for this study. Standard monitoring for general anaesthesia will be used. Immediately after induction of general anaesthesia, the anaesthesiologist will confirm the patient's intubation grade. Patients having an intubation grade higher than 2 on the Cormack-Lehane scale, will be excluded.

-Short-term phase (within a week from the initial phase):

Novices will be asked to perform ten tracheal intubations under the supervision of an anaesthesiologist but without any specific feedback.

-Mid-term phase (6 weeks after the initial/short-term phase):

Novices will be asked to perform ten tracheal intubations six weeks after the initial/short term phase under the supervision of an anaesthesiologist without any specific feedback. If the medical student fails to intubate the patient, the anaesthesiologist will perform the technique.

Images from all intubations will be captured on videotape for subsequent review. These images will be used to detect mucosa lacerations, oesophageal intubation, number of attempts and total time required to perform tracheal intubation.

Lastly, a questionnaire will be completed by all medical students to assess their satisfaction towards the teaching technique and their ability to perform tracheal intubation.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

18

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Quebec
      • Montreal, Quebec, Canada, H2L 4M1
        • Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal (Hôpital Notre-Dame)

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Limited experience with tracheal intubation (less than 5 intubations under supervision)
  • Pre-graduate medical students in their 2 clinical yea

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Health Services Research
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Video
Teaching tracheal intubation to medical students using video-guided feedback during the procedure.
Pregraduates medical students will be randomized to perform endotracheal intubation with video-guided feedback (experimental arm) or endotracheal intubation using direct visualization feedback (standard technique).
Active Comparator: Standard
Teaching tracheal intubation to medical students using direct visualization feedback during the procedure.
Pregraduates medical students will be randomized to perform endotracheal intubation with video-guided feedback (experimental arm) or endotracheal intubation using direct visualization feedback (standard technique).

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Ease to intubate (time and number of attempts required to perform intubation) and retention of the competency (short and mid-term)
Time Frame: Within a week and at 6 weeks
Within a week and at 6 weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Medical students' satisfaction towards the teaching technique and their ability to perform tracheal intubation.
Time Frame: At 6 weeks
At 6 weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: François Girard, MD, Centre hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal (CHUM)

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

January 1, 2010

Primary Completion (Actual)

April 1, 2010

Study Completion (Actual)

June 1, 2010

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

August 25, 2009

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 25, 2009

First Posted (Estimate)

August 27, 2009

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

June 11, 2010

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 10, 2010

Last Verified

June 1, 2010

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • FG 2010-001

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Endotracheal Intubation

Clinical Trials on Endotracheal intubation

3
Subscribe