Effectiveness and Biological Mechanism of Direct Ischemic Post-conditioning for Acute Stroke Patients Due to Large Vessel Occlusion

June 10, 2026 updated by: Ming Wei, Tianjin Huanhu Hospital

Effectiveness and Biological Mechanism of Direct Ischemic Post-conditioning for Acute Stroke Patients Due to Large Vessel Occlusion: A Randomized Controlled Pilot Trial

The goal of this clinical trial is to determine if direct ischemic post-conditioning (IPostC) can alleviate ischemic-reperfusion injury (I/R) in patients who have undergone endovascular thrombectomy (EVT). Additionally, the study aims to explore the underlying mechanisms of direct IPostC.

The primary questions this trial seeks to answer are:

  1. Is direct IPostC effective for acute stroke patients with large vessel occlusion?
  2. What are the underlying mechanisms of direct IPostC?

Participants will be randomly assigned to one of two groups: an EVT alone group or an EVT plus direct IPostC group. Direct IPostC will be administered immediately after EVT through four cycles of mechanical interruptions of reperfusion. We will evaluate outcomes based on final infarct volume, infarct volume growth, clinical parameters, and I/R-related imaging and laboratory biomarkers. Additionally, an exploratory multi-omics analysis will be conducted to uncover the detailed mechanisms of direct IPostC.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

60

Phase

  • Phase 2

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Tianjin Municipality
      • Tianjin, Tianjin Municipality, China, 300070
        • Tianjin Huanhu Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Ischemic stroke confirmed by CT or MRI.
  2. Large vessel occlusion confirmed by CTA or MRA, including the intracranial internal 3. carotid artery (ICA) and middle cerebral artery (MCA M1/M2).

4. Recanalization of the occluded vessel at eTICI grade 2b/3, confirmed by DSA after thrombectomy.

5. The patient or legally authorized representative has signed an informed consent form.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Inability to perform an MRI or CT scan for any reason.
  2. Presence of any condition that would interfere with neurological assessment or any psychiatric disorders.
  3. Stroke onset accompanied by seizures, resulting in the inability to obtain an accurate NIHSS baseline.
  4. Pregnancy.
  5. Presence of other serious, advanced, or terminal illnesses.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Endovascular therapy
Thrombectomy alone.
Experimental: Endovascular therapy plus direct ischemic post-conditioning
Thrombectomy alone.
After thrombectomy, the balloon was inflated to a pressure of no more than 4 atm at the occlusion site to block blood flow for 2 minutes, as confirmed by angiography. The balloon was then deflated, allowing blood flow to resume for 2 minutes. These steps were repeated four times.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Infarct Volume Growth
Time Frame: 48 (-12/+24) hours after randomization
Infarct volume at 48 (-12/+24) hours - Infarct volume at baseline
48 (-12/+24) hours after randomization

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Difference in modified Rankin Scale distribution
Time Frame: At 90 days post-randomization.
The modified Rankin Scale (mRS) is a 7-point ordinal scale ranging from 0 (no disability) to 6 (death). Higher scores indicate worse outcomes. The distribution of mRS scores (0-6) will be compared between treatment groups.
At 90 days post-randomization.
Difference in modified Rankin Scale of 0-1
Time Frame: At 90 days post-randomization.
The modified Rankin Scale (mRS) is a 7-point ordinal scale ranging from 0 (no disability) to 6 (death). Higher scores indicate worse outcomes. The proportion of mRS 0-1 will be compared between treatment groups.
At 90 days post-randomization.
Difference in modified Rankin Scale of 0-2
Time Frame: At 90 days post-randomization.
The modified Rankin Scale (mRS) is a 7-point ordinal scale ranging from 0 (no disability) to 6 (death). Higher scores indicate worse outcomes. The proportion of mRS 0-2 will be compared between treatment groups.
At 90 days post-randomization.
Longitudinal Change of NIHSS Scores
Time Frame: At 24 hours, 3 days, and 5-7 days post-randomization or at discharge.
The National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) is a 42-point ordinal scale ranging from 0 (no stroke symptoms) to 42 (severe stroke). Higher scores indicate worse neurological deficits. NIHSS scores will be serially assessed at specified intervals.
At 24 hours, 3 days, and 5-7 days post-randomization or at discharge.
Final infarct volume
Time Frame: 48 (-12/+24) hours after randomization
Infarct volume at 48 (-12/+24) hours post-randomization.
48 (-12/+24) hours after randomization
Immediate postprocedural infarct volume
Time Frame: Within 2 hours after procedure.
Infarct volume measured within 2 hours after procedure.
Within 2 hours after procedure.
Occurrence of early neurological improvement
Time Frame: Within 24 hours post-randomization.
The National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) is a 42-point ordinal scale ranging from 0 (no stroke symptoms) to 42 (severe stroke). Higher scores indicate worse neurological deficits. Early neurological improvement is defined as a reduction in NIHSS score by ≥8 points.
Within 24 hours post-randomization.

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Blood brain barrier permeability as measured by K-trans value using dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (DCE-MRI)
Time Frame: At 48 (-12/+24) hours post-randomization.
Ktrans reflects the rate at which contrast agent passes from the intravascular space into the brain tissue and serves as an indicator of BBB disruption. Higher Ktrans values indicate greater BBB permeability and more severe BBB injury.
At 48 (-12/+24) hours post-randomization.
Multi-omics analysis of protein and metabolite quantitative changes using mass spectrometry-based proteomics and metabolomics
Time Frame: Within 6 hours after randomization
Protein and metabolite abundances will be normalized and compared between study groups to identify differentially expressed molecules and biological pathways associated with treatment response.
Within 6 hours after randomization
Percentage of platelet-neutrophil aggregates (CD41+CD66b+ cells) measured by flow cytometry
Time Frame: Within 30 minutes after the procedure.
Higher percentages indicate increased platelet-neutrophil interactions and enhanced thrombo-inflammatory activity.
Within 30 minutes after the procedure.
Percentage of activated platelets (CD41+CD62+ cells) measured by flow cytometry
Time Frame: Within 30 minutes after the procedure.
Higher percentages indicate increased platelet activation and prothrombotic potential.
Within 30 minutes after the procedure.
Percentage of activated neutrophils (CD11b+ cells) measured by flow cytometry
Time Frame: Within 30 minutes after the procedure.
Higher percentages indicate greater neutrophil activation and inflammatory response.
Within 30 minutes after the procedure.
R time (reaction time) measured by thromboelastogram (TEG)
Time Frame: Within 30 minutes after the procedure.
Quantitative assessment of clot initiation dynamics using TEG. R time measures the latency to initial fibrin formation (reported in seconds). Lower values indicate faster clot initiation, while higher values suggest delayed clotting.
Within 30 minutes after the procedure.
K time (clot kinetics) measured by thromboelastogram (TEG)
Time Frame: Within 30 minutes after the procedure.
Quantitative assessment of clot formation speed using TEG. K time reflects the time from clot initiation to a fixed clot strength (reported in seconds). Lower values indicate faster clot kinetics, while higher values suggest slower clot formation.
Within 30 minutes after the procedure.
Alpha angle measured by thromboelastogram (TEG)
Time Frame: Within 30 minutes after the procedure.
Quantitative assessment of fibrin polymerization rate using TEG. The alpha angle (reported in degrees) represents the slope of clot strengthening. Higher values indicate faster fibrin cross-linking and clot stability.
Within 30 minutes after the procedure.
MA (maximum amplitude) measured by thromboelastogram (TEG)
Time Frame: Within 30 minutes after the procedure.
Quantitative assessment of clot strength using TEG. MA (reported in millimeters) measures the maximum clot firmness. Higher values indicate stronger clot structure, while lower values suggest weaker clot integrity.
Within 30 minutes after the procedure.
EPL (estimated percent lysis) measured by thromboelastogram (TEG)
Time Frame: Within 30 minutes after the procedure.
Quantitative assessment of clot lysis potential using TEG. EPL (reported as a percentage) estimates the percentage of clot lysed after maximum amplitude is reached. Higher values indicate greater fibrinolysis activity.
Within 30 minutes after the procedure.
LY30 (lysis at 30 minutes) measured by thromboelastogram (TEG)
Time Frame: Within 30 minutes after the procedure.
Quantitative assessment of late-stage clot lysis using TEG. LY30 measures the percentage of clot lysed 30 minutes after maximum amplitude. Higher values indicate increased fibrinolysis over time.
Within 30 minutes after the procedure.

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

September 12, 2024

Primary Completion (Actual)

August 15, 2025

Study Completion (Actual)

August 15, 2025

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

August 1, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 8, 2024

First Posted (Actual)

August 9, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

June 15, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 10, 2026

Last Verified

June 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Stroke, Acute

Clinical Trials on Endovascular therapy

Subscribe