Tamponade vs Partial Myometrial Resection of Lower Uterine Segment in Management of Placenta Accreta Spectrum Cases

August 27, 2024 updated by: Abdelrahman Nabil Abdelrahman, Assiut University
To compare the efficacy of lower uterine tamponade and partial lower myometrial resection in the management of intraoperative bleeding in cases with placenta accreta spectrum .

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Placenta accreta spectrum (PAS) represents the spectrum of clinical conditions when part or whole of the placenta becomes abnormally adherent or invades the myometrium (1-2). Over the last 40 years, caesarean delivery rates around the world have risen from less than 10% to over 30%, and almost simultaneously a 10-fold increase in the incidence of PAS (3). PAS is one of the most dangerous conditions of the pregnancy as it is significantly associated with maternal morbidity and mortality (4).

Ultrasound imaging is the most commonly used technique to diagnose PAS disorders prenatally. There is also wide variation globally on the management of PAS disorders, with some centres opting for a radical approach, whereas others have proposed a range of conservative approaches (5).

The conservative approaches include one-step conservative surgery, leaving the placenta in situ, the Triple-P procedure, and transverse B-Lynch suture (1). Several techniques have been described for controlling massive bleeding associated with placenta previa caesarean sections ,including uterine packing with gauze ,balloon tamponades ,the B-Lynch suture,insertion of parallel vertical compression sutures, a square suturing technique and embolization or ligation of the uterine and internal iliac arteries , but there is awide variation in the success rate of these maneuvers. Over-sewing of the bleeding site is the most common procedure used for PPH management, but in many cases, the bleeding points located in the lower segment and cervical canal are too deep and their locations are unclear because of the severity of the bleeding(

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

222

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child
  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • 1-Pregnant women with placenta previa /PAS diagnosed before delivery (by ultrasound and Doppler examination) .

    2 - Gestational age starting from 28 weeks onwards. 3- Women with at least 1 previous hysterotomy (e.g. Caesarean deliveries, myomectomy) 4- Elective or emergent Caesarean deliveries

Exclusion Criteria:

  • A pre-existing decision of performing intrapartum hysterectomy

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Non-Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: tamponade of lower uterine segmentin managment of placenta accreta spectrum cases
usage of tamponade of the lower uterine segment in managment of placnta accreta spectrum cases
To compare the efficacy of lower uterine tamponade and partial lower myometrial resection in the management of intraoperative bleeding in cases with placenta accreta spectrum
Active Comparator: partial myometrial resection of lower uterine segment in management of placenta accreta spectrum
partial resection of lower uterine segment myometrium
tamponade vs partial myomertial resection of lower uterine segment in managment of placenta accreta spectrum cases

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
amount of intraopertive blood loss.
Time Frame: 2 years
compare of amount of blood loss between two methods by adding collected blood in suction apparatus in milliliters to amount of biood in the soaked towels
2 years

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
ICU admission
Time Frame: 2 years
yes or no admission number of days if there is ICU admission cause of admission
2 years
Re exploration
Time Frame: 2 years
if there is exploration or no cause of re-exploration outcome of re-exploration
2 years
drop of HB level postoperative
Time Frame: 2 years
result of substitution of HB level postoperative from preoperative in gmldl
2 years
blood transfusion
Time Frame: 2 years
amount of transfused blood units
2 years

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Estimated)

September 1, 2024

Primary Completion (Estimated)

August 30, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

August 30, 2027

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

August 19, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 27, 2024

First Posted (Actual)

August 28, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

August 28, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 27, 2024

Last Verified

August 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

UNDECIDED

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Placenta Accreta

Clinical Trials on Tamponade of lower uterine segment in management of placenta accreta spectrum cases

Subscribe