- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT06584825
Enhanced Vitals Monitoring After Major Surgery Trial
The Impact of Enhanced Postoperative Vitals Monitoring In-hospital and at Home vs. Standard Care After Inpatient Abdominal and Vascular Surgery: A Pilot Two-centre Randomized Controlled Study
Study Overview
Status
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
After surgeries, patients are at risk of a variety of complications, thus requiring monitoring for early detection and treatment of complications. The current standard of care consists of continuous monitoring of vital signs during and after anesthetic and/or in the high-acuity and intensive care units, followed by intermittent measurement of vital signs once the patient is in the ward. Once the patient is at home, there is no monitoring nor follow-up.
However, it has been well-established that existing intermittent monitoring of vital signs are too infrequent to capture important vital sign derangements. For example, in an observational study of 312 patients who underwent abdominal surgery, 18% of patients had blood pressure <65 mmHg for at least 15 minutes that were not detected by conventional intermittent monitoring. Nevertheless, it remains unknown the optimal method and duration of increased monitoring for medium-to-high risk surgical patients in-hospital and at home. In a randomized controlled trial (RCT) involving 905 adults undergoing non-elective surgery, remote automated monitoring with virtual care did not reduce the number of days alive and at home 30 days after surgery (DAH30) compared to standard of care. However, there are signals of increased detection of drug errors, decreased pain, and benefits in patients in centres with more escalations in care.
This study is a single-blinded, parallel-group, pilot RCT, with an exploratory feasibility analysis. The study will be reported according to the Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials (CONSORT) pilot RCT standards.
The study will be conducted at St Paul's Hospital (SPH), Providence Health Care (PHC), in Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada, an academic tertiary care hospital affiliated with the University of British Columbia. The study will also run at and Mount Saint Joseph's (MSJ) Hospital, PHC. The PHC anesthesia and surgical program already has a strong perioperative care focus, featuring enhanced postoperative support available for high risk patients including 1) surgical high-acuity unit (SHAU) with continuous monitoring, run by anesthesiologists, 2) Perioperative Outreach Team that rounds on patients daily for as long as clinically indicated, run by anesthesiologists, 3) multidisciplinary collaboration and support from perioperative internal medicine and/or geriatric teams, with daily rounding for as long as clinically indicated and availability for preoperative consultation and post-discharge follow-up in rapid access clinics, and 4) protocolized monitoring for myocardial injury after non-cardiac surgery for three days according to the Canadian Cardiovascular Society guidelines.
The objective of the study is to obtain pilot data on the enhanced monitoring of vital signs in patients undergoing inpatient major abdominal and/or vascular surgery (i.e. continuous monitoring of vital signs in-hospital (from the day of surgery until 3 days after surgery) followed by twice-daily monitoring at home for 3 days after discharge, with a protocol for care escalation if needed, compared to standard monitoring (intermittent monitoring in-hospital and no monitoring at home).
Study Type
Enrollment (Estimated)
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Contact
- Name: Janny Ke, MD
- Phone Number: 604-816-3339
- Email: janny.ke@ubc.ca
Study Contact Backup
- Name: Nicola Edwards, MHA
- Phone Number: 604-816-3339
- Email: nedwards@providencehealth.bc.ca
Study Locations
-
-
British Columbia
-
Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada, V6Z 1Y6
- Recruiting
- St. Paul's Hospital
-
Contact:
- Nicola Edwards, MHA
- Phone Number: 604-861-9024
- Email: nedwards@providencehealth.bc.ca
-
Principal Investigator:
- Janny Xue Chen Ke, MD
-
Sub-Investigator:
- Su-Yin MacDonell, MD
-
Sub-Investigator:
- Charles V Yu, MD
-
Sub-Investigator:
- Jesse Greiner, MD
-
Sub-Investigator:
- Amandeep Ghuman, MD
-
Sub-Investigator:
- Jason Sutherland, PhD
-
Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada, V5T 3N4
- Recruiting
- Mount Saint Joseph's Hospital
-
Contact:
- Nicola Edwards
- Phone Number: 62115 604-682-2344
- Email: nicola.edwards@phc.ca
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Adult
- Older Adult
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Undergoing inpatient major abdominal (general surgery, urology, or gynecology) or vascular surgery at St. Paul's Hospital (SPH) and Mount Saint Joseph (MSJ) Hospital
- Length of stay of at least 48 hours (planned by the clinical team, or by the Canadian Institute of Health Information Discharge Abstract Database Expected Length of Stay (ELOS) for the surgical case mix group
- Self-reported fluency in reading and speaking in English for patient or home caregiver
- Living within British Columbia, Canada and in an area that is covered by Bell cellular network (the Cloud DX Inc. device has cellular Long Term Evolution (LTE) using the Bell network).
Exclusion Criteria:
- Patient refusal
- Transplant surgery, since these patients have a unique set of considerations and postoperative course.
- Inability to communicate with research personnel, perform self-monitoring of vital signs, or complete study surveys due to cognitive, language, visual, or hearing barriers
- Lack of capacity to consent to the study (including under the active influence of sedative medication or having received general anesthetic within the past 24 hours)
- Unable to use (or does not have a caregiver who can help put on/take off) study monitoring device at home
- Preoperatively known planned discharge to a nursing home or rehabilitation facility
- Patient with known allergic reactions to any part material of the device
- Unable to monitor blood pressure accurately noninvasively using arm blood pressure cuffs, such as due to underlying vascular anatomy or non-pulsatile blood flow physiology
- Unlikely to be able to return the home monitoring kit (no fixed address, living too far away from site, etc.)
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Other
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Single
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Enhanced Vitals Monitoring
Enhanced (i.e.
additional) monitoring using Health Canada approved devices in-hospital postoperatively, 8am to 5pm from the day of surgery until 3 days after surgery or until discharged (whichever occurs first) followed by twice-daily monitoring at home 3 days after discharge, with a protocol for clinical escalation if vital sign alert thresholds are exceeded.
|
For participants in the intervention group, they will receive the enhanced continuous vital sign monitoring, on top of the standard of care monitoring as prescribed per the care team. The enhanced monitoring will be provided during in-hospital postoperatively, 8am to 5pm from the day of surgery until 3 days after surgery or until discharged (whichever occurs first) with a protocol for clinical escalation if vital sign alert thresholds are exceeded, using the Philips monitor (i.e. heart rate and oxygen saturation continuously and blood pressure once an hour while awake). Participants and caregivers will be educated how to put on and off the devices by the study coordinator. When participants return home, they will perform twice-daily monitoring using the Cloud DX Inc. Home kit and daily questionnaires at home for 3 days after discharge, with a protocol for clinical escalation if vital sign alert thresholds are exceeded. |
|
No Intervention: Standard Care
Standard vitals monitoring in hospital and standard of care follow-up procedures once discharged home.
The research team will administer a questionnaire at 14 and 30 days postoperatively and conduct a 30 day phone call follow-up.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Days Alive At Home (DAH30)
Time Frame: Within 30 days after surgery, with the day of surgery as day 0
|
Number of days within 30 days of surgery when participants are alive and at home, without visiting an emergency department or urgent care centre or being admitted to a hospital. Home refers to their own home, or a residence of a relative, friend or acquaintance, but excludes a nursing home or a rehabilitation facility. If a participant visits an emergency department or urgent care centre, or is admitted to a hospital any time between midnight and 23:59 on a given day, they will lose that day as a day alive at home. If they remain in the care facility past midnight into the next day, then they lose 2 days alive at home. They will continue to lose days alive at home until the day in which they are home from midnight for an entire day. In other words, a day alive at home can be counted only when participants spend an entire day from midnight to 23:59 at home, without being stay at an emergency department, an urgent-care centre or a hospital. |
Within 30 days after surgery, with the day of surgery as day 0
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Major Morbidity
Time Frame: Within 30 days after surgery, with the day of surgery as day 0
|
Complications associated with 30-day mortality: major bleeding, myocardial injury after noncardiac surgery (includes myocardial infarction), myocardial infarction (3rd Universal Definition), sepsis, infection without sepsis, acute kidney injury with new dialysis, stroke, venous thromboembolism and congestive heart failure) within 30 days postoperatively
|
Within 30 days after surgery, with the day of surgery as day 0
|
|
Mortality
Time Frame: Within 30 days after surgery, with the day of surgery as day 0
|
All cause mortality within 30 days of surgery
|
Within 30 days after surgery, with the day of surgery as day 0
|
|
Emergency Department visit(s) after discharge
Time Frame: Within 30 days after surgery, with the day of surgery as day 0
|
This outcome describes if a participant visited an emergency department after discharge within 30 days of surgery, and if so, a count of how many times.
|
Within 30 days after surgery, with the day of surgery as day 0
|
|
Readmission(s)
Time Frame: Within 30 days after surgery, with the day of surgery as day 0
|
This outcome describes if a participant was readmitted to hospital after initial discharge from hospital within 30 days of surgery, and if so, for how long and how many times.
|
Within 30 days after surgery, with the day of surgery as day 0
|
|
Urgent walk-in clinic visit(s)
Time Frame: Within 30 days after surgery, with the day of surgery as day 0
|
This outcome describes if a participant visited an urgent walk-in clinic after discharge within 30 days of surgery, and if so, a count of how many times.
|
Within 30 days after surgery, with the day of surgery as day 0
|
|
Family doctor clinic visit(s)
Time Frame: Within 30 days after surgery, with the day of surgery as day 0
|
This outcome describes if a participant visited a family doctor clinic after discharge within 30 days of surgery, and if so, a count of how many times.
This will include details of planned (for suture/staple removal, or other reason) vs. unplanned
|
Within 30 days after surgery, with the day of surgery as day 0
|
|
Surgeon clinic contact(s)
Time Frame: Within 30 days after surgery, with the day of surgery as day 0
|
This outcome describes if a participant visited their surgeon after discharge within 30 days of surgery, and if so, a count of how many times.
This will also include details of whether it was a planned (for suture/staple removal, or other reason) vs. unplanned visit and an email, phone call or clinic visit.
|
Within 30 days after surgery, with the day of surgery as day 0
|
|
Post-Operative Length of Stay
Time Frame: The time from the date of the surgery to the date of discharge from the hospital, up to 30 days after surgery
|
The amount of time a patient is in hospital after their operation.
|
The time from the date of the surgery to the date of discharge from the hospital, up to 30 days after surgery
|
|
Quality of Recovery at 30 days postoperatively
Time Frame: 30 days after surgery with the day of surgery as day 0
|
Measured using the Quality of Recovery-15 (QoR-15) score. QoR-15 scale is a validated tool to assess the quality of postoperative recovery. It consists of 15 likert questions in two parts. Part A consists of 10 questions asking a patient how they have been feeling in the previous 24 hours with regards to factors such as sleeping and eating. Responses are given on an 11 point likert scale from 0 to 10, where 0 is none of the time [poor] and 10 is all of the time [excellent]. Part B consists of five questions which ask the patient if they have experienced specific adverse events (for example, pain, nausea/vomiting or anxiety). Responses are given on an 11 point likert scale from 10 to 0, where 10 is none of the time [excellent] and 0 is all of the time [poor]. This questionnaire is administered either over the phone, online or on paper. |
30 days after surgery with the day of surgery as day 0
|
|
Quality of Recovery at baseline
Time Frame: 14 days after surgery
|
Measured using the Quality of Recovery-15 (QoR-15) score. QoR-15 scale is a validated tool to assess the quality of postoperative recovery. It consists of 15 likert questions in two parts. Part A consists of 10 questions asking a patient how they have been feeling in the previous 24 hours with regards to factors such as sleeping and eating. Responses are given on an 11 point likert scale from 0 to 10, where 0 is none of the time [poor] and 10 is all of the time [excellent]. Part B consists of five questions which ask the patient if they have experienced specific adverse events (for example, pain, nausea/vomiting or anxiety). Responses are given on an 11 point likert scale from 10 to 0, where 10 is none of the time [excellent] and 0 is all of the time [poor]. This questionnaire is administered either over the phone, online or on paper. |
14 days after surgery
|
|
Quality of Recovery at 14 days postoperatively
Time Frame: 14 days after surgery
|
Measured using the Quality of Recovery-15 (QoR-15) score. QoR-15 scale is a validated tool to assess the quality of postoperative recovery. It consists of 15 likert questions in two parts. Part A consists of 10 questions asking a patient how they have been feeling in the previous 24 hours with regards to factors such as sleeping and eating. Responses are given on an 11 point likert scale from 0 to 10, where 0 is none of the time [poor] and 10 is all of the time [excellent]. Part B consists of five questions which ask the patient if they have experienced specific adverse events (for example, pain, nausea/vomiting or anxiety). Responses are given on an 11 point likert scale from 10 to 0, where 10 is none of the time [excellent] and 0 is all of the time [poor]. This questionnaire is administered either over the phone, online or on paper. |
14 days after surgery
|
Other Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Completion of the intervention
Time Frame: 30 days after surgery with the day of surgery as day 0
|
The primary feasibility outcome is defined as more than 80% of participants completing the monitoring protocol, with a priori definition of the completion being monitoring in-hospital and at home each for 3 times a day for 3 days (or the duration of the hospital stay, whichever is shorter).
|
30 days after surgery with the day of surgery as day 0
|
|
Participant Recruitment Rate
Time Frame: Preoperatively, at the time of recruitment, up to 1 month prior to surgery.
|
The proportion of patients recruited who provided consent out of all meeting the clinical inclusion criteria
|
Preoperatively, at the time of recruitment, up to 1 month prior to surgery.
|
|
Participant Exclusion Rate
Time Frame: Preoperatively, at the time of screening and recruitment, up to 1 month prior to surgery.
|
The proportion of patients excluded out of all patients screened
|
Preoperatively, at the time of screening and recruitment, up to 1 month prior to surgery.
|
|
Participant Withdrawal Rate
Time Frame: Preoperatively, at the time of recruitment, up to 30 days post-operatively
|
The proportion of patients who withdrew from the study out of all enrolled patients.
|
Preoperatively, at the time of recruitment, up to 30 days post-operatively
|
|
Device issues encountered
Time Frame: Up to 30 days after surgery, with the day of surgery as day 0
|
Issues that participants reported encountering with the monitoring devices.
Reported as an open ended question in the patient daily log sheet
|
Up to 30 days after surgery, with the day of surgery as day 0
|
|
Reasons for device removal
Time Frame: Up to 30 days after surgery, with the day of surgery as day 0
|
What were the reasons that patients took the monitors on and off (e.g.
charging/battery life, showers, eating, mobilization/physiotherapy) as reported as an open ended question in the patient daily log sheet
|
Up to 30 days after surgery, with the day of surgery as day 0
|
|
Interruptions in vitals monitoring
Time Frame: Up to 30 days after surgery, with the day of surgery as day 0
|
Description of instances of interruption in monitoring that were more than 4 hours
|
Up to 30 days after surgery, with the day of surgery as day 0
|
|
Care escalation frequency
Time Frame: Up to 30 days after surgery, with the day of surgery as day 0
|
The frequency of vital sign derangements detected by enhanced monitoring and the resulting care escalation categorized by type of vital measure within the duration of monitoring.
This will be determined based on data from the devices and as reported by the patients nurse.
|
Up to 30 days after surgery, with the day of surgery as day 0
|
|
Response time
Time Frame: Up to 30 days after surgery, with the day of surgery as day 0
|
Time between vital sign alert and care escalation. This will be determined based on data from the devices and as reported by the patients nurse. xii. logistics of device use (time spent on education, initiation, discontinuation, cleaning, collection, and troubleshooting of devices) xiii. issues that arise in the workflow |
Up to 30 days after surgery, with the day of surgery as day 0
|
|
Logistics of Enhanced Monitoring Implementation
Time Frame: Up to 30 days after surgery, with the day of surgery as day 0
|
Description of the logistics of implementing the intervention.
This includes a description of time spent on education, initiation, discontinuation, cleaning, collection, and troubleshooting of the devices by the study coordinator.
|
Up to 30 days after surgery, with the day of surgery as day 0
|
|
Workflow Issues
Time Frame: Up to 30 days after surgery, with the day of surgery as day 0
|
A qualitative description of issues that arise in the workflow of implementing the intervention.
|
Up to 30 days after surgery, with the day of surgery as day 0
|
|
Adverse Events
Time Frame: Up to 30 days after surgery, with the day of surgery as day 0
|
Any patient-reported adverse events
|
Up to 30 days after surgery, with the day of surgery as day 0
|
|
Patient Feedback
Time Frame: 30 days after surgery, with the day of surgery as day 0
|
An evaluation of potential harm or safety issues gathered from a feedback questionnaire filled out by the participant at the end of the enhanced monitoring period. The Feedback questionnaire uses a 5 point likert scale (1-5), where 1 = Strongly disagree…3 = Neutral…5 = Strongly agree. The questionnaire asks patients to rate how they feel about the following statements: i. Their ability to move around after surgery ii. Their daily activities (e.g. going to the bathroom, eating, showering) iii. Making them anxious about your health? There is also one open ended question for participants to add any other feedback they have related to enhanced monitoring |
30 days after surgery, with the day of surgery as day 0
|
|
Study Costs
Time Frame: Pre-study and up to time of publication
|
Overall study costs spent and difference of costs between intervention group and standard care group
|
Pre-study and up to time of publication
|
|
Questionnaire Completion
Time Frame: From time of enrollment to 30 days after surgery with the day of surgery as day 0
|
Completion rates of all questionnaires administered
|
From time of enrollment to 30 days after surgery with the day of surgery as day 0
|
|
Method of Questionnaire Completion
Time Frame: From time of enrollment to 30 days after surgery with the day of surgery as day 0
|
Number of participants that completed questionnaires over the phone, online or on paper.
|
From time of enrollment to 30 days after surgery with the day of surgery as day 0
|
|
Support needed for questionnaires
Time Frame: From time of enrollment to 30 days after surgery with the day of surgery as day 0
|
Number of participants that required either caregiver or family member or technical support to complete questionnaires.
|
From time of enrollment to 30 days after surgery with the day of surgery as day 0
|
|
Participant patterns of use of monitoring devices
Time Frame: Up to 30 days after surgery, with the day of surgery as day 0
|
How frequently did patients use the monitoring devices and for what duration.
This will be based on data collected from the devices.
The monitoring will take place for 3 days after surgery in hospital, or until discharge (whichever occurs first) and 3 days once the patient returns home.
|
Up to 30 days after surgery, with the day of surgery as day 0
|
|
In-Hospital Enhanced Monitoring Device System Usability Scale
Time Frame: At the time of discharge from hospital or 3 days after surgery (whichever occurs first)
|
Patient feedback about enhanced monitoring device usability of the in-hospital enhanced monitoring device.
The System Usability Scale (SUS) is a patient-reported measurement which includes ten 5-point likert scale questions from 1 to 5, with one being strongly disagree and 5 being strongly agree.
The suitability of using SUS for evaluating medical devices has been well established.
|
At the time of discharge from hospital or 3 days after surgery (whichever occurs first)
|
|
At-Home Enhanced Monitoring Device System Usability Scale
Time Frame: Between 3 days after hospital discharge to 30 days after surgery, with the day of surgery as day 0
|
Patient feedback about enhanced monitoring device usability of the at-home enhanced monitoring devices.
The System Usability Scale (SUS) is a patient-reported measurement which includes ten 5-point likert scale questions from 1 to 5, with one being strongly disagree and 5 being strongly agree.
The suitability of using SUS for evaluating medical devices has been well established.
|
Between 3 days after hospital discharge to 30 days after surgery, with the day of surgery as day 0
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Collaborators
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Janny Ke, MD, University of British Columbia
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Primary Completion (Estimated)
Study Completion (Estimated)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- H23-03640
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Surgery
-
MedtronicCompletedThoracic Surgery | Spine Surgery | Upper Extremity Surgery | Lower Extremity Surgery | Intracranial Surgery | Extracranial Surgery | Intratemporal Surgery | Extratemporal Surgery | Neck SurgeryGermany
-
[Redacted]3M; Solventum US LLCWithheldAbdominal Surgery | Orthopedic Surgery | Vascular Surgery | Cardiovascular SurgeryUnited States
-
Vanderbilt UniversityCompletedHand Surgery | Wrist Surgery | Forearm Surgery | Elbow SurgeryUnited States
-
Nantes University HospitalCompletedGynecological Surgery | Plastic Surgery | ENT SurgeryFrance
-
Edwards LifesciencesCompletedAbdominal Surgery | Pelvic Surgery | Non-Cardiac/ Non-Thoracic Surgery | Major Peripheral Vascular SurgeryUnited States
-
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de NīmesNot yet recruitingAnesthesia, Local | Foot Surgery | Hand Surgery | Walant SurgeryFrance
-
Baylor Research InstituteChiesi USA, Inc.CompletedSurgery | Cardiac Surgery | Surgery--Complications | Percutaneous Coronary InterventionUnited States
-
Maquet Cardiopulmonary GmbHNAMSATerminatedCardiac Surgery | Cardiopulmonary Bypass | Thoracic Surgery | Vascular SurgerySpain, Italy
-
Vanderbilt UniversityEdwards LifesciencesCompletedCardiac Surgery | Thoracic Surgery | Heart Surgery | Heart Transplant
-
Eurosets S.r.l.RecruitingCardiac Surgery | Cardiopulmonary Bypass | Heart Surgery | Aortic Valve Surgery | Cannulation | Coronary Surgery With Cardiopulmonary Bypass | Coronary Surgery | Arterial Cannulation | Venous CannulationItaly
Clinical Trials on Enhanced Vitals Monitoring
-
Celero Systems, Inc.Completed
-
University of FloridaNational Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NINDS); National Institute...RecruitingPain | Delirium | Confusion | Critical IllnessUnited States
-
University of California, San FranciscoNational Institute of Mental Health (NIMH); Kenya Medical Research InstituteCompletedHIV Infections | Pregnancy Related | ViremiaKenya
-
Neopenda, PBCAmref Health AfricaNot yet recruiting
-
University of PennsylvaniaSuspendedArthropathy of Knee Joint | Arthropathy of Hip JointUnited States
-
Children's Hospital of PhiladelphiaRutgers University; NJ Dept of Health Commission on Cancer ResearchCompleted
-
VA Office of Research and DevelopmentRecruiting
-
University of South CarolinaPrisma Health-MidlandsRecruitingPregnancy | Hypertension (HTN) | Blood Pressure MonitoringUnited States
-
VA Office of Research and DevelopmentCompletedUsual Care | Enhanced Telephone MonitoringUnited States
-
Braincare LimitedNot yet recruiting