- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT06590532
Evaluation of the Clinical and Cost-effectiveness of an Automated Mobile Hybrid Room in Vascular Surgery Compared with Current Practice (RADIOPROTEC)
French Randomised Controlled Trial Investigating the Clinical and Cost-effectiveness Role of a Cloud-based, Artificial Intelligent Image Fusion System to Guide Endovascular Aortic Aneurysm Repair and Aorto Iliac Revascularisation.
Evaluation of the clinical and cost-effectiveness of a mobile hybrid room compared with current practice without mobile hybrid room and imaging fusion guidance, in a French multicentre clinical setting.
The hypothesis is that the use of a mobile hybrid room with an automated artificial intelligent image fusion system would directly benefit patients, health worker and health care system by reducing procedure time, patient and staff exposure to radiation, improve clinical success and reduce costs (requested by a fixed imaging system installation and increasing the number of patients). This will also improve the safety of these procedures for patient and staff, when a conventional hybrid room is not available
Study Overview
Status
Conditions
Detailed Description
Multi-centre, patient- and observer-blinded, two-armed, parallel groups randomised controlled trial. 7 French University hospital will include 350 patients presenting with AAA or aorto iliac occlusive disease suitable for endovascular treatment, to either repair using standard X-ray fluoroscopy imaging alone (the current reference standard) or augmented with automated image fusion. The study will be conducted in real-world clinical settings and will focus on multiple providers to demonstrate the effect in the wider healthcare system.
The trial will be conducted in 7 centres in France over 24 months. 350 patients will be recruited over a 18 month period, with 3 months minimum follow-up. Every vascular surgeon will be trained to use properly the fusion system, and the first 5 patients of each center won't be included.
Radiation parameters (machine report, passive dosimeters), iodinated contrast, technical and clinical success at 30-d and 3 months, procedure time, fluoro time, and costs will be collected.
Study Type
Enrollment (Estimated)
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Contact
- Name: Blandine Maurel, Pr
- Phone Number: 02 40 16 53 72
- Email: blandine.maurel@chu-nantes.fr
Study Locations
-
-
-
Besançon, France, 25000
- Not yet recruiting
- Rinckenbach
-
Contact:
- Simon Rinckenbach, Pr
- Phone Number: 03 81 66 80 99
- Email: srinckenbach@chu-besancon.fr
-
Contact:
- Simon Rinckenbach, Pr
-
Brest, France, 29200
- Not yet recruiting
- NASR
-
Contact:
- Bahaa Nasr, Pr
- Phone Number: 02 98 22 33 33
- Email: nasr.bahaa@gmail.com
-
Contact:
- Bahaa Nasr, Pr
-
Créteil, France, 94000
- Not yet recruiting
- El Batti
-
Contact:
- Salma El Batti, Pr
- Phone Number: 01 56 09 57 00
- Email: salma.elbatti@aphp.fr
-
Contact:
- Salma El Batti, Pr
-
Grenoble, France, 38000
- Not yet recruiting
- Spear
-
Contact:
- Rafaëlle Spear, Pr
- Phone Number: 04 76 76 50 26
- Email: rafaelle.spear@gmail.com
-
Contact:
- Rafaëlle Spear, Pr
-
Nantes, France, 44000
- Recruiting
- Pr Blandine Maurel
-
Contact:
- Blandine Maurel, Pr
- Phone Number: 0240165372
- Email: blandine.maurel@chu-nantes.fr
-
Contact:
- Blandine MAUREL, Pr
-
Nice, France, 06000
- Not yet recruiting
- Jean-Baptiste
-
Contact:
- Elixène Jean-Baptiste, Pr
- Phone Number: 04 92 03 38 35
- Email: jean-baptiste.e@chu-nice.fr
-
Contact:
- Elixène Jean-Baptiste, Pr
-
Reims, France, 51100
- Not yet recruiting
- Duprey
-
Contact:
- Ambroise Duprey, Pr
- Phone Number: 03 26 78 78 78
- Email: ambroise.duprey@gmail.com
-
Contact:
- Ambroise Duprey, Pr
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Adult
- Older Adult
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Procedure carried out in an operating theatre equipped with a mobile operating theatre C-arm or a mobile planar or an old-generation fixed room with no image fusion available
- Surgeon trained in the use of image fusion
- Operator who has given their consent
- Endovascular management of an aorto-iliac artery disease or a sub-renal AAA using a sub-renal bifurcated stent graft
- Patient in possession of an angioscan less than 6 months old
- Patient of legal age who has given his/her consent
- Ionising radiation generator with up-to-date and validated quality control
- Participant affiliated to a Social Security scheme
Exclusion Criteria:
- First procedure with fusion for the previously trained surgeon.
- Procedure performed without an operating aid.
- Emergency procedure.
- Associated surgical procedure (femoropopliteal lesions, lesions of the renal or digestive arteries, iliac branch).
digestive arteries, iliac branch).
- Patients with AAA that cannot be treated by a simple sub-renal endovascular approach simple endovascular approach (subrenal bifurcated stent graft)
- Aortic emergencies (ruptured AAA).
- Persons under guardianship, curatorship or safeguard of justice
- Pregnant or breast-feeding women.
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: None (Open Label)
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Fusion group
patient undergoing endovascular aortic repair with fusion imaging system guidance
|
Cydar-EV image fusion is a CE-marked medical device, which instead of a table-tacked overlay uses computer vision to fuse pre-procedural 3D images with intra-operative 2D fluoroscopy automatically and in real-time.
|
|
Active Comparator: Control group
patient undergoing endovascular aortic repair without fusion imaging system guidance (only with X-rays and roadmaping)
|
patients will be assigned either to an endovascular repair using standard X-ray fluoroscopy imaging alone (the current reference standard)
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Cost consequence analysis associated with endovascular procedures performed using automatic imaging fusion guidance and conventional endovascular technique performed without image fusion guidance up to 30 days time horizon and a collective perspective.
Time Frame: 18 month
|
To compare the costs and consequences associated with endovascular procedures performed using automatic imaging fusion guidance and conventional endovascular technique performed without image fusion guidance.
Consequences are listed in the secondary endpoints.
Cos twill be express in €.
|
18 month
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
30-day mortality
Time Frame: 30 days
|
30-day mortality
|
30 days
|
|
X-ray dose per procedure
Time Frame: day 0
|
exposure parameters from the machine
|
day 0
|
|
X-ray dose per procedure for the physician
Time Frame: day 0
|
exposure parameters from the dosimeter
|
day 0
|
|
Contrast dose per procedure
Time Frame: day 0
|
Contrast dose used
|
day 0
|
|
Length of ITU/HDU admission
Time Frame: 18 months
|
Length of ITU/HDU admission
|
18 months
|
|
Technical success
Time Frame: day 0
|
defined as proximal and distal seal zone at least 10mm and no evidence of endoleak or revascularization success.
|
day 0
|
|
Clinical success
Time Frame: 1 month
|
defined as primary patency rate or endovascular exclusion of the aneurysm
|
1 month
|
|
Quality of life questionnaire
Time Frame: 30 days
|
EQ-5D-5L assessement
|
30 days
|
|
cost-effectiveness
Time Frame: 5 years
|
Net financial impact over 5 years of SHMA deployment (based on the 5-year projection and different different scenarios for the spread of the technology)
|
5 years
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Primary Completion (Estimated)
Study Completion (Estimated)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Other Study ID Numbers
- RC22_0396
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Endovascular
-
University Hospital, BrestNot yet recruitingEndovascular Treatments | Endovascular Surgery | Peripheral ArterialFrance
-
University Health Network, TorontoPhilips HealthcareUnknownEndovascular ProceduresCanada
-
Air Force Military Medical University, ChinaCompletedEndovascular ProceduresChina
-
West China HospitalCompletedEndovascular Therapy | Neurological ComplicationsChina
-
University of North Carolina, Chapel HillWithdrawnChanges in Renal Artery Movement Due to Respiration Before and After Fenestrated Endovascular RepairFenestrated Endovascular Aortic Repair
-
Medical University of ViennaRecruiting
-
Chiyi ChenCompletedLiver Transplantation | Endovascular Treatment
-
Cordis CorporationCardinal HealthCompleted
-
University GhentUniversity of TorontoRecruitingQuality Improvement | Patient Safety | Endovascular ProceduresBelgium
-
NHS LothianNot yet recruitingEndovascular Procedures | Force Sensing Surgical GlovesUnited Kingdom
Clinical Trials on Endovascular aneurysm repair or aorto iliac endovascular revascularisation with Fusion imaging system Cydar-EV
-
Cook Group IncorporatedNo longer availableAorto-iliac Aneurysms | Iliac AneurysmsUnited States
-
Jonathan BathUniversity of Missouri-ColumbiaRecruitingAortic Aneurysm | Endovascular Aneurysm RepairUnited States