Evaluation of the Clinical and Cost-effectiveness of an Automated Mobile Hybrid Room in Vascular Surgery Compared with Current Practice (RADIOPROTEC)

December 16, 2024 updated by: Nantes University Hospital

French Randomised Controlled Trial Investigating the Clinical and Cost-effectiveness Role of a Cloud-based, Artificial Intelligent Image Fusion System to Guide Endovascular Aortic Aneurysm Repair and Aorto Iliac Revascularisation.

Evaluation of the clinical and cost-effectiveness of a mobile hybrid room compared with current practice without mobile hybrid room and imaging fusion guidance, in a French multicentre clinical setting.

The hypothesis is that the use of a mobile hybrid room with an automated artificial intelligent image fusion system would directly benefit patients, health worker and health care system by reducing procedure time, patient and staff exposure to radiation, improve clinical success and reduce costs (requested by a fixed imaging system installation and increasing the number of patients). This will also improve the safety of these procedures for patient and staff, when a conventional hybrid room is not available

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Multi-centre, patient- and observer-blinded, two-armed, parallel groups randomised controlled trial. 7 French University hospital will include 350 patients presenting with AAA or aorto iliac occlusive disease suitable for endovascular treatment, to either repair using standard X-ray fluoroscopy imaging alone (the current reference standard) or augmented with automated image fusion. The study will be conducted in real-world clinical settings and will focus on multiple providers to demonstrate the effect in the wider healthcare system.

The trial will be conducted in 7 centres in France over 24 months. 350 patients will be recruited over a 18 month period, with 3 months minimum follow-up. Every vascular surgeon will be trained to use properly the fusion system, and the first 5 patients of each center won't be included.

Radiation parameters (machine report, passive dosimeters), iodinated contrast, technical and clinical success at 30-d and 3 months, procedure time, fluoro time, and costs will be collected.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

350

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

      • Besançon, France, 25000
        • Not yet recruiting
        • Rinckenbach
        • Contact:
        • Contact:
          • Simon Rinckenbach, Pr
      • Brest, France, 29200
        • Not yet recruiting
        • NASR
        • Contact:
        • Contact:
          • Bahaa Nasr, Pr
      • Créteil, France, 94000
        • Not yet recruiting
        • El Batti
        • Contact:
        • Contact:
          • Salma El Batti, Pr
      • Grenoble, France, 38000
        • Not yet recruiting
        • Spear
        • Contact:
        • Contact:
          • Rafaëlle Spear, Pr
      • Nantes, France, 44000
        • Recruiting
        • Pr Blandine Maurel
        • Contact:
        • Contact:
          • Blandine MAUREL, Pr
      • Nice, France, 06000
        • Not yet recruiting
        • Jean-Baptiste
        • Contact:
        • Contact:
          • Elixène Jean-Baptiste, Pr
      • Reims, France, 51100
        • Not yet recruiting
        • Duprey
        • Contact:
        • Contact:
          • Ambroise Duprey, Pr

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Procedure carried out in an operating theatre equipped with a mobile operating theatre C-arm or a mobile planar or an old-generation fixed room with no image fusion available
  • Surgeon trained in the use of image fusion
  • Operator who has given their consent
  • Endovascular management of an aorto-iliac artery disease or a sub-renal AAA using a sub-renal bifurcated stent graft
  • Patient in possession of an angioscan less than 6 months old
  • Patient of legal age who has given his/her consent
  • Ionising radiation generator with up-to-date and validated quality control
  • Participant affiliated to a Social Security scheme

Exclusion Criteria:

  • First procedure with fusion for the previously trained surgeon.
  • Procedure performed without an operating aid.
  • Emergency procedure.
  • Associated surgical procedure (femoropopliteal lesions, lesions of the renal or digestive arteries, iliac branch).

digestive arteries, iliac branch).

  • Patients with AAA that cannot be treated by a simple sub-renal endovascular approach simple endovascular approach (subrenal bifurcated stent graft)
  • Aortic emergencies (ruptured AAA).
  • Persons under guardianship, curatorship or safeguard of justice
  • Pregnant or breast-feeding women.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Fusion group
patient undergoing endovascular aortic repair with fusion imaging system guidance
Cydar-EV image fusion is a CE-marked medical device, which instead of a table-tacked overlay uses computer vision to fuse pre-procedural 3D images with intra-operative 2D fluoroscopy automatically and in real-time.
Active Comparator: Control group
patient undergoing endovascular aortic repair without fusion imaging system guidance (only with X-rays and roadmaping)
patients will be assigned either to an endovascular repair using standard X-ray fluoroscopy imaging alone (the current reference standard)

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Cost consequence analysis associated with endovascular procedures performed using automatic imaging fusion guidance and conventional endovascular technique performed without image fusion guidance up to 30 days time horizon and a collective perspective.
Time Frame: 18 month
To compare the costs and consequences associated with endovascular procedures performed using automatic imaging fusion guidance and conventional endovascular technique performed without image fusion guidance. Consequences are listed in the secondary endpoints. Cos twill be express in €.
18 month

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
30-day mortality
Time Frame: 30 days
30-day mortality
30 days
X-ray dose per procedure
Time Frame: day 0
exposure parameters from the machine
day 0
X-ray dose per procedure for the physician
Time Frame: day 0
exposure parameters from the dosimeter
day 0
Contrast dose per procedure
Time Frame: day 0
Contrast dose used
day 0
Length of ITU/HDU admission
Time Frame: 18 months
Length of ITU/HDU admission
18 months
Technical success
Time Frame: day 0
defined as proximal and distal seal zone at least 10mm and no evidence of endoleak or revascularization success.
day 0
Clinical success
Time Frame: 1 month
defined as primary patency rate or endovascular exclusion of the aneurysm
1 month
Quality of life questionnaire
Time Frame: 30 days
EQ-5D-5L assessement
30 days
cost-effectiveness
Time Frame: 5 years
Net financial impact over 5 years of SHMA deployment (based on the 5-year projection and different different scenarios for the spread of the technology)
5 years

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

December 10, 2024

Primary Completion (Estimated)

May 1, 2025

Study Completion (Estimated)

May 1, 2026

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

June 24, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 6, 2024

First Posted (Actual)

September 19, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 25, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 16, 2024

Last Verified

December 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • RC22_0396

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Endovascular

Clinical Trials on Endovascular aneurysm repair or aorto iliac endovascular revascularisation with Fusion imaging system Cydar-EV

Subscribe