Proof of Concept Study to Assess Safety and Efficacy of Phage Therapy in Hip or Knee Prosthetic Joint Infections Due to Staphylococcus Aureus Treated by DAIR. (GLORIA)

March 31, 2026 updated by: Phagenix

A Phase II Proof of Concept Multicenter, Randomized, Double-Blind Study to Assess the Safety and Efficacy of Phage Therapy in Patients With Hip or Knee Prosthetic Joint Infection Due to Staphylococcus Aureus Treated by DAIR

Total joint replacements are effective for chronic pain but can lead to Prosthetic Joint Infections (PJI), primarily caused by Staphylococcus aureus and resistant to antibiotics. Standard treatment involves DAIR surgery and antibiotics, but there's a need for better solutions due to rising infections and antibiotic resistance. Bacteriophage therapy, which targets specific bacteria, shows promise. Phaxiam Therapeutics is studying the safety and efficacy of phage therapy in treating Staphylococcus aureus infections in hip or knee PJI patients undergoing DAIR.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Total joint replacement serves as valuable interventions in the management of chronic refractory pain when the other conservative treatments have not worked. They play a vital role in alleviating discomfort and improving the quality of life of subjects battling with joint diseases. However, the joint replacements present the challenge of Prosthetic Joint Infection (PJI). PJI have serious complications and can lead to significant mortality, morbidity, and healthcare expenditure.

The leading cause of PJI is gram-positive cocci, specifically Staphylococcus aureus. Bacterial biofilms, mainly formed with Staphylococcus, represent a significant challenge in the treatment of PJIs due to their resistance to antibiotic therapy. Standard of Care (SOC) for these complex infections is characterized primarily by an initial surgery (Debridment Antibiotics and Implant Retention (DAIR) and various regiments and combinations of antibiotics. While the patterns of utilization vary between institutions and geography, DAIR is considered low-invasive procedure, characterized by the possibility of not explanting the prosthetic implant and resecting the bone. The growing demand for joint arthroplasty and current PJI rates, combined with antibacterial resistance, clearly indicate an unmet medical need in treating biofilm-based PJIs.

Bacteriophage therapy could potentially improve the treatment paradigm for PJIs. Bacteriophages naturally occur with highly specific bacterial viruses that infiltrate bacterial cells, disrupting their metabolism, and causing bacterial lysis. Initial in vivo studies of phage therapy for bone-related infections have shown promise.

Phaxiam Therapeutics, a biotechnology company specializing in the research and development of anti-infective therapies using bacteriophages., has collections of phages against Escherichia coli, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and Staphylococcus aureus. These phages have shown promise in preliminary tests and studies.

The objective of GLORIA study Is to assess the safety and efficacy of phage therapy versus placebo in treating Staphylococcus aureus infections in hip or knee PJI patients undergoing DAIR.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

100

Phase

  • Phase 2

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Male or female ≥ 18 years
  2. Knee or Hip PJI according to EBJIS (European Bone and Joint Infection) or ICM (International Consensus Meeting) guidelines
  3. Monobacterial Infection due to S. aureus
  4. Without preoperative diagnosis of superinfection due to another pathogen if treatment is administered at the end of the DAIR (presence of a contaminant is not considered clinically relevant)
  5. Without diagnosis of superinfection due to another pathogen identified within 72h after bacteriological sample performed during the DAIR if treatment is administered up to 14 days after the DAIR
  6. Indication for Open DAIR decided by the Multidisciplinary Team and/or Principal Investigator
  7. S. aureus in joint fluid during the pre-inclusion period or in case of relapse of infection under antibiotics therapy in the last 6 months before inclusion
  8. Patient with a life expectancy of 1 year or more as determined by the principal investigator.
  9. Females of childbearing potential/Sexually active males with partner of childbearing potential: commitment to consistently and correctly use an acceptable effective method of birth control until 1 month after the last study drug administration.
  10. Females of non-childbearing potential: either surgically sterilized or at least 1 year postmenopausal (amenorrhea duration at least 12 months)

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Relapse between DAIR and study drug administration planned up to 14 days after the DAIR.
  2. Patients who have two planned DAIR in sequence (double DAIR)
  3. Patients with ASA score ≥ 4
  4. Severe sepsis or Septic shock or hemodynamic instability
  5. Patients with an indication for fixed prosthesis exchange, or for joint fusion or for amputation
  6. Indication for suppressive antibiotherapy
  7. Immunosuppressed patients: Patients having a weakened immune system due to diseases conditions (i.e. genetic disorders, malnutrition) or treatment (i.e. anticancer drugs or organ transplant)
  8. Positive Human Immunodeficiency Viruses (HIV) test or active hepatitis B and C
  9. Previous treatment by bacteriophages
  10. Any known phage allergy and/or to its excipients
  11. Elevated ALT or AST above 4 times ULN

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Quadruple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Active Arm
Anti-Staphylococcus aureus Bacteriophages (PP1493 and PP1815) intra-articular injection with 0.9% NaCl solution
Three intra-articular injections during and/or following DAIR procedure
Placebo Comparator: Control Arm
0.9% NaCl solution
Three intra-articular injections during and/or following DAIR procedure

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
To assess the safety of phage therapy + DAIR compared with placebo + DAIR
Time Frame: From enrollment up to 3 months
Incidence of serious adverse events
From enrollment up to 3 months
To assess the efficacy of phage therapy + DAIR compared with placebo + DAIR
Time Frame: From enrollment up to 3 months
Percentage of patients with clinical cure
From enrollment up to 3 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
To assess the safety of phage therapy + DAIR compared with placebo + DAIR
Time Frame: From enrollment up to 12 months
Incidence of all adverse events and all safety parameters
From enrollment up to 12 months
To assess the efficacy of phage therapy + DAIR compared with placebo + DAIR
Time Frame: From enrollment up to 12 months
Percentage of Patient with clinical cure from S.aureus's infection up to 6 months and up to 12 months. Percentage of patients with relapse exclusively due to another germ than Staphylococcus aureus up to 3 months, 6 months and 12 months
From enrollment up to 12 months
To describe the immunological response in serum and in joint fluid
Time Frame: From enrollment up to 3 months
Titration of anti-Staphylococcus aureus phage antibodies
From enrollment up to 3 months
To describe the S. aureus bacterial load (bacteriology) in the joint fluid up to 1 month
Time Frame: From enrollment up to 1 month
Quantitative or Semi-Quantitative analysis of bacterial load
From enrollment up to 1 month
To describe Cytology in the joint fluid
Time Frame: From enrollment up to 1 month
Quantification and identification of polynuclear of joint fluid
From enrollment up to 1 month
To describe the hospitalization duration
Time Frame: From enrollment up to 3 months and up to 12 months
Number of hospitalizations
From enrollment up to 3 months and up to 12 months
To describe the hospitalization duration
Time Frame: From enrollment up to 3 months and up to 12 months
Total duration of hospitalizations
From enrollment up to 3 months and up to 12 months
To describe the quality of life for patients
Time Frame: From enrollment up to 3 months and up to 12 months
Results of quality-of-life questionnaires (EQ-5D-5L: EuroQol-5 Dimensions-5 Levels) from 0 (worst health you can imagine) to 100 (best health you can imagine)
From enrollment up to 3 months and up to 12 months
To describe joint function rehabilitation
Time Frame: From enrollment up to 3 months and up to 12 months
Total score of either KOOS-12 (Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score 12 questions) OR HOOS-12 (Hip Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score-12 questions) Questionnaires, depending on infected joint. The score is calculated in a scale from 0 (extreme symptoms) to 100 (absence of symptoms).
From enrollment up to 3 months and up to 12 months
To describe the evolution of the prosthetic joint infection by X Ray image
Time Frame: From screening up to 3 months and up to 12 months
X Ray image analysis to detect the potential appearance of abnormal loosening (border with shifting of the prosthesis)
From screening up to 3 months and up to 12 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Investigators

  • Study Director: Pascal Chief Medical Officer, Phagenix
  • Study Director: Audrey Study Team Leader, Phagenix

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Estimated)

July 1, 2026

Primary Completion (Estimated)

March 1, 2028

Study Completion (Estimated)

September 1, 2029

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

August 29, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 19, 2024

First Posted (Actual)

September 20, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

April 6, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 31, 2026

Last Verified

March 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

Yes

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Hip Prosthesis Infection

Subscribe