What is the Efficiency When Comparing Active Sentry at Low IOP vs Ozil at High IOP?

The objective is to assess the efficiency of the Active Sentry handpiece at low intraocular pressure (IOP) compared with the Ozil at high IOP.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Detailed Description

This study is a single site, single-masked, randomized, prospective, contralateral eye study of the efficiency of the Active Sentry handpiece at low IOP compared with the Ozil at high IOP.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

36

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Oregon
      • Medford, Oregon, United States, 97504
        • Cataract & Laser Institute

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sampling Method

Probability Sample

Study Population

Eligible test subjects will be 50 years of age or older and who are eligible to undergo sequential bilateral uncomplicated cataract surgery.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

Subjects are eligible for the study if they meet the following criteria:

Note: Ocular criteria must be met in both eyes.

  • Be eligible to undergo sequential bilateral uncomplicated cataract surgery.
  • Undergo uneventful cataract surgery.
  • Gender: Males and Females.
  • Both eyes must have same grade of cataract.
  • Willing and able to provide written informed consent for participation in the study.
  • Willing and able to comply with scheduled visits and other study procedures.

Exclusion Criteria:

If any of the following exclusion criteria are applicable to the subject or either eye, the subject should not be enrolled in the study.

  • Patient under 50 years of age.
  • Unable to complete sequential bilateral cataract surgery in both eyes by the same surgeon (JS).
  • Patient cataract surgery complicated by posterior capsular tear.
  • Any disease state deemed by PI that increases risk of complicated cataract surgery (ie Pseudoexfoliation syndrome, zonular dehiscence, history of eye trauma, RA, prior refractive surgery, etc).

The principal investigator reserves the right to declare a patient ineligible or non-evaluable based on medical evidence that indicates they are unsuitable for the trial.

Pregnancy has a known effect on the stability of refractions and visual acuity. As such, subjects who become pregnant during the study will not be discontinued but their data may be excluded from analyses of effectiveness.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
Active Sentry Handpiece
At low IOP settings
With low IOP settings
Ozil Handpiece
At high IOP settings
With high IOP settings.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Total Aspiration Time
Time Frame: Day of surgery (Day 0)
Day of surgery (Day 0)

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Total Fluid Volume
Time Frame: Day of surgery (Day 0)
Day of surgery (Day 0)
Total Phaco Time
Time Frame: Day of surgery (Day 0)
Day of surgery (Day 0)
Central Corneal Thickness
Time Frame: 1 week postoperative
1 week postoperative

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Cumulative Dissipated Energy (CDE)
Time Frame: Day of surgery (Day 0)
CDE is the amount of ultrasound energy used to remove a cataractous lens. CDE is the power and time of torsional and longitudinal ultrasound delivery modes. It is not expressed in standard units, but is generally unitless. CDE is calculated by the Centurion® Vision System automatically. A lower value is indicative of lower energy used in the eye.
Day of surgery (Day 0)

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Collaborators

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Justin Spaulding, DO, Cataract and Laser Institute

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

May 16, 2023

Primary Completion (Actual)

April 19, 2024

Study Completion (Actual)

April 19, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

May 3, 2023

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 11, 2023

First Posted (Actual)

May 22, 2023

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

April 17, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 16, 2025

Last Verified

April 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • JS-23-01

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

Yes

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

Yes

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Cataract

Clinical Trials on Active Sentry Handpiece

Subscribe