- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT06615739
Comprehensive SRS Regenerex Tissue Attachment
PMCF Study to Provide Safety, Performance and Clinical Benefits Data of the Comprehensive Segmental Revision System (SRS) Regenerex Tissue Attachment Augments - A Retrospective Enrollment and Prospective Follow-up Consecutive Series Study
Study Overview
Status
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Consecutive subjects implanted with Comprehensive SRS Regenerex Tissue Attachment Augments according to the approved indications, with the longest-term follow-up possible, will be identified and invited to participate in the study.
The primary objective is the assessment of safety by analyzing implant survivorship. This will be established by recording the incidence and frequency of revisions, complications, and adverse events. Relation of the events to the implant and/or procedure should be specified.
The study will include one site. There will be a maximum of 103 patients enrolled in the study.
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
Florida
-
Boca Raton, Florida, United States, 33432
- Toman Orthopedics and Sports Med
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Adult
- Older Adult
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Sampling Method
Study Population
Subjects must meet the inclusion criteria to be enrolled into the study. Subjects who meet any of the exclusion criteria should not be enrolled into the study.
The study population will comprise a consecutive cohort of up to 103 subjects implanted using the Comprehensive SRS Regenerex Tissue Attachment Augments.
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Patient must be 18 years of age or older.
- Patient must be willing and able to follow directions.
The Comprehensive Segmental Revision System was used in cases of:
- Non-inflammatory degenerative joint disease including osteoarthritis and avascular necrosis.
- Revision where other devices or treatments have failed.
- Correction of functional deformity.
- Oncology applications including bone loss due to tumor resection.
- Proximal or total humeral replacement, for: Treatment of acute or chronic fractures with humeral head (shoulder) involvement, which are unmanageable using other treatment methods.
- Distal or total humeral replacement for: Treatment of acute or chronic fractures with humeral epicondyle (elbow) involvement, which are unmanageable using other treatment methods.
- Biomet Comprehensive Segmental Revision System was used in a reverse application in patients whose shoulder joint has a grossly deficient rotator cuff with severe arthropathy and/or previously failed shoulder joint replacement with a grossly deficient rotator cuff for proximal humeral replacement. The patient must be anatomically and structurally suited to receive the implants and a functional deltoid muscle is necessary.
- The Comprehensive Segmental Revision System was used with bone cement in distal humeral and total humeral applications.
- Regenerex Tissue Attachment Augments were used in combination with the Comprehensive Segmental Revision System
Exclusion Criteria:
Absolute contraindications:
- Infection
- Sepsis
- Osteomyelitis
- Patient is a prisoner
- Patient is a current alcohol or drug abuser
- Patient has a psychiatric illness or cognitive deficit that will not allow for proper informed consent
- Patient is unwilling to consent
Relative contraindications:
- Uncooperative patient or patient with neurologic disorders who is incapable of following directions
- Osteoporosis
- Metabolic disorders which may impair bone formation
- Osteomalacia
- Distant foci of infections which may spread to the implant site
- Vascular insufficiency, muscular atrophy, or neuromuscular disease
- The Comprehensive Segmental Revision System was used in a reverse shoulder application in patients receiving radiation therapy
- The Comprehensive Segmental Revision System was used without bone cement in distal humeral and total humeral applications.
- Regenerex Tissue Attachment Augments weren't used during the patient's surgery
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
Cohorts and Interventions
Group / Cohort |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Comprehensive Regenerex Tissue Attachment Augments
Regenerex Tissue Attachment Augments were used in combination with the Comprehensive Segmental Revision system
|
Patient will have been previously implanted with Regenerex Tissue Attachment Augments in combination with the Comprehensive Segmental Revision System
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Kaplan Meier Implant Survivorship
Time Frame: Up to 10 Years
|
This will be established by recording the incidence and frequency of device revisions.
Kaplan-Meier survival analysis is a statistical method that estimates survival rates over time and accounts for factors that can affect implant survival.
|
Up to 10 Years
|
|
Safety Assessement
Time Frame: Up to 10 Years
|
This will be established by recording the incidence and frequency of complications and adverse events.
Relation of the events to the implant and/or procedure will be specified.
|
Up to 10 Years
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Assessment of performance and clinical benefits by recording patient reported QuickDASH
Time Frame: Up to 10 Years
|
QuickDASH, or Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand, is a questionnaire that measures the impact of upper limb musculoskeletal disorders on physical function and symptoms. The QuickDASH has 11 items that cover six domains: Daily activities: How much difficulty the patient has performing physical activities Symptoms: How severe the patient's pain and tingling is Social function: How the patient's problem affects their social activities Work function: How the patient's problem affects their work Sleep: How the patient's problem affects their sleep Confidence: How the patient's problem affects their confidence Each item is rated on a 5-point Likert scale, with 1 being no difficulty and 5 being unable. The score is then converted to a 100-point scale, with 100 representing the greatest disability. |
Up to 10 Years
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Investigators
- Study Director: Erin Osborn, Zimmer Biomet
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Primary Completion (Estimated)
Study Completion (Estimated)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Estimated)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- CMU2024-12E
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
IPD Plan Description
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Arthroplasty Complications
-
Hospital for Special Surgery, New YorkMedical College of WisconsinRecruitingComplications; Arthroplasty | Complications; Arthroplasty, MechanicalUnited States
-
Afyonkarahisar Health Sciences UniversityRecruiting
-
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de NiceCompletedArthroplasty ComplicationsFrance
-
Restor3DCompletedComplications; ArthroplastyUnited States
-
Groupe Hospitalier de la Rochelle Ré AunisCompletedArthroplasty ComplicationsFrance
-
Stryker OrthopaedicsCompleted
-
GCS Ramsay Santé pour l'Enseignement et la RechercheCompletedArthroplasty ComplicationsFrance
-
Central Hospital, Nancy, FranceCompleted
-
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire, AmiensCompletedArthroplasty Complications
-
Norfolk and Norwich University Hospitals NHS Foundation...University of East Anglia; Dynamic Metrics LtdCompletedArthroplasty ComplicationsUnited Kingdom