Exploratory Study on Global Reflexology in Sickle Cell Disease (REFLEXODREPANO)

July 4, 2025 updated by: Hospices Civils de Lyon

Exploratory Study on Global Reflexology Proposed in the Management of Pain in Children With Sickle Cell Disease in Vaso-occlusive Crisis

Sickle cell disease (or sickle cell anemia) is the most common genetic disease in France with 586 children screened in 2019. This chronic disease is characterized by the presence of abnormal Hemoglobin (Hb) S and a deformation of the red blood cells which take the elongated shape of a sickle and become more rigid and more fragile. Sickle cell disease manifests itself among other things by very painful vaso-occlusive crises (VOC) and for some chronic pain.

Their management is an emergency and often requires hospitalization. Despite analgesic treatment, some patients have persistent pain.

In 2013, a childcare assistant trained in Canadian global reflexology EMC offered reflexology sessions to 12 sickle cell patients. She observed a relief in all patients with a decrease in the pain score in 8 of them. These sessions seem to show us a double interest: the reduction of the child's pain and the emergence of a technique that can be used by paramedics in the context of their own role.

The investgators hypothesize that global reflexology is an effective and acceptable complementary technique for pain management in addition to the usual analgesic management in sickle cell children under 18 years of age in CVO. In order to verify our hypothesis, the investigators propose to explore the practice of Canadian global reflexology as an innovative therapeutic option complementary to drug treatments in the hospital management of sickle cell children.

Study Overview

Status

Recruiting

Intervention / Treatment

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

30

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child
  • Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patient under 18 years of age
  • Patient suffering from sickle cell disease
  • Patient hospitalized in the UHCD or USC unit of the Women's Mother and Child Hospital of the Hospices Civils de Lyon for the management of a CVO
  • Informed consent signed by at least one holder of parental authority
  • Collection of the patient's assent as soon as his age allows it.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patient with PCA (Patient Controlled Analgesia)
  • Patient with NCA (Nurse Controlled Analgesia)
  • Patient not affiliated to a social security scheme or beneficiaries of a similar scheme.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Supportive Care
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Other: global reflexology
This study involves subjects under 18 years of age, suffering from sickle cell disease, hospitalized in the short-stay hospitalization unit (UHCD) or continuous monitoring unit (USC) of the Women's Mother and Child Hospital of the Hospices Civils de Lyon.
The EMC method is a global reflexology technique inspired by the work of the American naturopath Stanley Burrough (Vitaflex, 1976). It is a method of reflexology on the whole body, of acupressure massages (rhythmic and targeted movements) on so-called "reflex" zones which is practiced on different areas of the body (feet, hands, arms, legs, collarbone, ear) and allows the stimulation of all systems.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Pain score T20 with the Face Legs Activity Cry Consolability scale
Time Frame: 20 minutes after the start of the session

Evolution of pain scores (Face Legs Activity Cry Consolability - FLACC according to the child's age) T0 and T20 minutes after the start of the session.

The minimum value is 0 (no pain) and the maximum is 10 (maximum pain). All professionals are trained in the use of the FLACC pain scale

20 minutes after the start of the session
Pain score T20 with the Visual Analog Scale
Time Frame: 20 minutes after the start of the session
Evolution of pain scores (VAS - Visual Analog Scale according to the child's age) T0 and T20 minutes after the start of the session. The minimum value is 0 (no pain) and the maximum is 10 (maximum pain). All professionals are trained in the use of the VAS pain scale
20 minutes after the start of the session

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Pain score T80 with the Visual Analog Scale
Time Frame: 80 MINUTES after the start of the session
Changes in pain scores (VAS - Visual Analog Scale according to the child's age) at each session between T0 and T80 minutes after the start of the session. The minimum value is 0 (no pain) and the maximum is 10 (maximum pain). All professionals are trained in the use of the VAS pain scale
80 MINUTES after the start of the session
Pain score T80 with the Face Legs Activity Cry Consolability scale
Time Frame: 80 minutes after the start of the session
Changes in pain scores (Face Legs Activity Cry Consolability according to the child's age) at each session between T0 and T80 minutes after the start of the sessionmn. The minimum value is 0 (no pain) and the maximum is 10 (maximum pain). All professionals are trained in the use of the FLACC pain scale
80 minutes after the start of the session
Length of hospitalization
Time Frame: 1 Month
Length of stay of patients included in the study, defined by the time between their entry into the UHCD or USC and their return home.
1 Month
Number of reflexology sessions
Time Frame: 1 Month
Total number of global reflexology sessions performed for each child included in the study.
1 Month
Recorded side effects, complications
Time Frame: 1 Month
Recorded side effects, complications
1 Month
Acceptability of the technique : refusal to participate.
Time Frame: 25 Months
Acceptability of the technique: number of refusals to participate in the protocol during the study.
25 Months
Acceptability of the technique: reason for refusal to participate.
Time Frame: 25 months
Acceptability of the technique: reasons of refusals to participate in the protocol during the study.
25 months
Acceptability of the technique: interruption of participation.
Time Frame: 25 months
Acceptability of the technique: number of requests for interruption during the study.
25 months
Acceptability of the technique: reason for interruption of participation
Time Frame: 25 months
Acceptability of the technique: reasons for discontinuations for requests of interruption during the study.
25 months
Feasibility of the technique
Time Frame: 25 months
Feasibility of the technique: integration into the management of CVO: number of sessions not performed or interrupted and reasons, duration of sessions.
25 months
Inclusion rate
Time Frame: 25 months
Monthly inclusion rate in the study, characteristics of the eligible population, included and not included.
25 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: COLLOT SOPHIE, Hospices Civils de Lyon

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

June 30, 2025

Primary Completion (Estimated)

July 30, 2027

Study Completion (Estimated)

July 30, 2027

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

September 13, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 25, 2024

First Posted (Actual)

October 1, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimated)

July 8, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 4, 2025

Last Verified

July 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 69HCL22_0315
  • 2023-A01667-38 (Other Identifier: ID-RCB)

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Sickle Cell Disease (SCD)

Clinical Trials on Global reflexology

Subscribe