Eltrombopag as a Novel Therapeutic Approach for Low-risk MDS and CMML With TET2 Mutations

June 4, 2026 updated by: Abhay Singh, MD MPH

A Phase II Study of Eltrombopag as a Novel Therapeutic Approach for Patients With Low-risk Myelodysplastic Syndromes (MDS) and Chronic Myelomonocytic Leukemia (CMML) With TET2 Mutations

The purpose of this study is to evaluate if a study drug called eltrombopag can improve the blood cell counts in patients with low-risk Myelodysplastic Syndromes (MDS) and Chronic Myelomonocytic Leukemia (CMML) with mutations in TET2 gene, observe changes in the TET2 gene over time, and evaluate the effectiveness of the treatment. TET2 gene is one of the most frequently mutated genes (altered parts of the DNA) in MDS and CMML.

Eltrombopag is a Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved drug for the treatment of severe aplastic anemia and low levels of platelets in patients with persistent or chronic immune thrombocytopenia (ITP) and chronic hepatitis C. Eltrombopag is considered investigational (experimental) in this study because the FDA has not approved its use in the treatment of low-risk MDS or CMML. Eltrombopag is a drug that helps stimulate the body's process of making more platelets (small components of blood that help with clotting) by interacting with specific parts of cells. This interaction starts a series of signals that encourage the growth and development of the cells that produce platelets. It was found that this drug could stop the growth of TET2 mutated cells.

Study Overview

Status

Suspended

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

Epigenetic changes such as alterations in DNA methylation and histone modification play an important role in the pathophysiology of myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS). With the development of next-generation sequencing (NGS) platforms, it has become possible to identify genomic aberrations involved in the MDS epigenetics. Additionally, with the advances in therapeutic methods in MDS, several novel genomic aberrations have been reported to predict the effectiveness of specific treatment. It is becoming clear that genomic aberrations may offer more precise cancer phenotypes and help predict precise therapies for MDS patients (e.g. IDH1 and IDH2 inhibitors). TET2 gene is a member of the DNA methylation machinery and one of the most frequently mutated genes in MDS and chronic myelomonocytic leukemia (CMML; a disease entity similar to MDS with similar bone marrow dysplasia and accompanying cytopenias). TET DNA dioxygenases hydroxylate 5-methylcytosine (5mC) to 5-hydroxy-mC (5hmC), a process that leads to passive demethylation and thereby initiation of differentiation programs of hematopoietic stem cells (HSCs). TET2 mutations (TET2MT) often act as founder lesions for clonal hematopoiesis of indeterminate potential (CHIP). Our group has demonstrated that mutational exclusivity of TET2 and isocitrate dehydrogenases 1 and 2 (IDH1/2) result from production of a neomorphic natural TET2 inhibitor α-hydroxyglutarate (2HG). 2HG is selectively and synthetically lethal to TET2-deficient HSCs reliant for their survival on minimal residual dioxygenase activity supplied by less abundant TET1 and TET3. This observation inspired the idea of generating TET inhibitors as drugs selective for TET2 mutant (TET2MT) leukemia cells. Based on the structure of 2HG, investigator generated a more potent TETi76, and showed that this drug is indeed synthetically lethal to TET2MT and TET2 proficient cells. In search for alternative agents with suitable activity, investigator next performed a high throughput drug screen using an in vitro DNA dioxygenase assay. Among several hits, eltrombopag (EPAG) was unique, as it is already used in clinical practice as a thrombopoietin receptor (TPOR) agonist. Investigator showed that this agent inhibited growth of TET2MT cells in murine TET2MT models independent of its TPOR activity, and have determined its binding site and mode of action on TET dioxygenases.1 Since EPAG is an FDA approved drug with known toxicities and good tolerability, repurposing this agent as a TET inhibitor would greatly shorten the development time and thus rapidly provide a selective and well-tolerated drug for the therapy of patients with TET2MT MDS. Investigators have obtained granular molecular and response data from historical trials of EPAG/5Azacytidine in unselected MDS and aplastic anemia (AA) and were able to retrospectively assert that indeed those with TET2MT disease responded to EPAG therapy, resulting in decreased TET2MT clonal burden.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

25

Phase

  • Phase 2

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Ohio
      • Cleveland, Ohio, United States, 44195
        • Case Comprehensive Cancer Center, Cleveland Clinic Foundation Taussig Cancer Institute

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age ≥ 18 years at the time of signing the informed consent form.
  • Willing and able to adhere to the study visit schedule and other protocol requirements.
  • Established diagnosis of very low-, low-, or intermediate-risk MDS (IPSS-R < 3.5) and < 5% myeloblasts or CMML 0 (CMML-0, for cases with < 2% blasts in PB and < 5% blasts in bone marrow (BM)z,[14] with any one of the notable cytopenias as defined below:

    1. Hgb < 10 g/dL prior to enrollment
    2. ANC < 1.5×10^9/L
    3. Platelets < 100×10^9/L
  • Must be relapsed, refractory/resistant, intolerant, or have inadequate response to therapies with known clinical benefits for MDS, such as EPOs, luspatercept, and HMAs (i.e., azacytidine or decitabine). Patients with del (5q) must have failed prior lenalidomide therapy.
  • TET2 mutation performed at a frequency of at least > 5%.
  • ECOG performance status of 0-2.
  • Adequate organ function, defined as:

    1. Serum total bilirubin < 2x ULN, unless the subject has Gilbert's syndrome. Higher levels are acceptable if these can be attributed to ineffective erythropoiesis. In these cases, approval from the study PI is required.
    2. Creatinine clearance greater than 30 mL/min based on the Cockroft-Gault glomerular filtration rate estimation.
    3. Participants being enrolled on study on the basis of anemia, will only be eligible if folate, B12, serum iron, serum ferritin, total iron binding capacity, haptoglobin and peripheral smear within normal limits
    4. Hepatitis panel negative for Hep B and Hep C infection
    5. Negative for HIV infection
  • Women of childbearing potential (WOCBP) may participate provided they have a negative serum pregnancy test at screening and a negative serum or urine pregnancy test within 72 h of starting treatment.
  • WOCBP and males with partners who are WOCBP must agree to abstain from sexual intercourse or use effective contraception (methods that result in < 1% pregnancy rates) during eltrombopag therapy and for at least 7 days after the last eltrombopag dose. Males with partners who are WOCBP must agree to use a barrier method.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • High- and Very High-risk MDS (per IPSS-R)
  • CMML 1-2
  • Prior HMA exposure
  • Platelet count > 200×10^9/uL or leukocytosis of at least 25×10⁹/L
  • Marrow fibrosis (any grade)
  • Results of bone marrow biopsy within 1 month of study entry (screening bone marrow biopsy) indicating high-risk MDS or CMML-2.
  • Elevated LFTs (aminotransferases and bilirubin) > 2x ULN
  • Pre-existing cardiovascular disease (e.g., known coronary artery disease with percutaneous intervention or stroke within the last year) or arrhythmia (e.g., atrial fibrillation) associated with an increased risk of thromboembolic events, unless deemed acceptable by the enrolling treating physician.
  • History of arterial or venous thromboembolism, and on anticoagulation.
  • Severe hepatic impairment (Child-Pugh Class C)
  • Recent history of cancer (i.e., within the past 5 years) with > 50% chance of cancer recurrence in the next 5 years
  • Current or prior history of hematologic malignancy
  • Known dysphagia, short-gut syndrome, gastroparesis, or other conditions that limit the ingestion or gastrointestinal absorption of drugs administered orally.
  • Active uncontrolled systemic fungal, bacterial, or viral infection (defined as ongoing signs/symptoms related to the infection without improvement despite appropriate antibiotics, antiviral therapy, and/or other treatment.)
  • Positive direct Coombs test
  • Evidence of hypersplenism on physical exam
  • Pregnant or lactating (women)

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Eltrombopag (EPAG)
Enrolled participants will receive EPAG 50 mg daily, 2h prior to or after meals for 1 cycle
50 mg, 28-day cycles, 3 initial cycles + 12 cycles on extension arm (maximum of 15 cycles)
Other Names:
  • Promacta

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Response Rate as assessed by hematologic response
Time Frame: At end of treatment (approximately up to 12 weeks)
Response rate will be assessed to determine whether treatment with EPAG can induce a hematologic response. The different types of hematologic improvement are Erythroid response (non-transfusion dependent, Erythroid response (transfusion dependent), Platelet response (pretreatment, > 20 × 109/L), Platelet response (pretreatment, < 20 × 109/L), Neutrophil response, and Progression or relapse after HI (after reaching maximum dose, and on maximum dose for 12 weeks).
At end of treatment (approximately up to 12 weeks)

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
AML-free survival
Time Frame: At end of treatment (approximately up to 12 weeks)
AML-free survival will be calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method
At end of treatment (approximately up to 12 weeks)
Progression Free Survival
Time Frame: At end of treatment (approximately up to 12 weeks)
Progression free survival will be calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method
At end of treatment (approximately up to 12 weeks)
Change in TET2 mutation burden as measured by variant allele fraction.
Time Frame: Baseline, end of cycle 3(28 days per cycle), end of treatment(approximately up to 12 weeks)
Change in mutant TET2 variant allele fraction
Baseline, end of cycle 3(28 days per cycle), end of treatment(approximately up to 12 weeks)
Rates of robust response as measured by platelet count
Time Frame: Approximately at 24 weeks post administration of intervention
Robust response will be summarized with a frequency and 95% confidence interval.
Approximately at 24 weeks post administration of intervention
Rates of robust response as measured by hemoglobin
Time Frame: Approximately at 24 weeks post administration of intervention
Robust response will be summarized with a frequency and 95% confidence interval.
Approximately at 24 weeks post administration of intervention
Rates of robust response as measured by ANC
Time Frame: Approximately at 24 weeks post administration of intervention
Robust response will be summarized with a frequency and 95% confidence interval.
Approximately at 24 weeks post administration of intervention

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Abhay Singh, MD, MPH, Case Comprehensive Cancer Center, Cleveland Clinic Taussig Cancer Institute

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

June 17, 2025

Primary Completion (Estimated)

January 1, 2028

Study Completion (Estimated)

January 1, 2030

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

October 4, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 4, 2024

First Posted (Actual)

October 8, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

June 5, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 4, 2026

Last Verified

June 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Plan Description

All IPD that underlie results in publication will be shared as a combined summary. Any individual outcomes published per subject will be de- identified utilizing the subject ID (e.g., dosing, demographics, adverse events, etc.)

IPD Sharing Time Frame

Data included in the peer reviewed publication will be publicly available starting 6 months after publication and will be available indefinitely. No raw data will be shared.

IPD Sharing Access Criteria

A peer-reviewed publication will be made available according to the publishing journal's specifications. CCF personnel will not share study data apart from that which has been published publicly.

IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type

  • STUDY_PROTOCOL
  • SAP
  • ICF
  • CSR

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

Yes

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Myelodysplastic Syndromes

Clinical Trials on Eltrombopag (EPAG)

Subscribe