Effects of Coordinative Exercise on Physical Fitness, Motor Competence, and Inhibitory Control in Preschoolers

October 7, 2024 updated by: umut canlı, Namik Kemal University

The Effects of Structured Coordinative Exercise Protocol on Physical Fitness, Motor Competence and Inhibitory Control in Preschool Children

The goal of this study was to determine whether a structured coordinative exercise program could improve physical fitness, motor competence, and inhibitory control in preschool children. The main questions it aimed to answer were:

Does the exercise program improve children's physical fitness (agility, balance, vertical jump)? Does it enhance motor competence, particularly hand-eye coordination and balance? Does it affect inhibitory control, a key component of cognitive function? Researchers compared children who participated in an 8-week exercise program to those who followed their regular school activities.

Participants:

Took part in two 30-minute exercise sessions per week for 8 weeks Were assessed before and after the intervention on physical fitness, motor competence, and inhibitory control The study found significant improvements in physical fitness and motor competence, but no significant changes in inhibitory control.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Scope and Content of the Study

This study evaluated the effectiveness of a structured coordinative exercise protocol aimed at improving physical fitness, motor competence, and inhibitory control in preschool children. Early childhood is considered a critical period for both physical and cognitive development. During this phase, enhancing motor skills and physical fitness forms a crucial foundation for long-term health, social adaptation, and academic success. However, these developmental opportunities may be missed if children do not engage in sufficient levels of physical activity. In this context, the study sought to investigate the effects of exercise interventions that support both motor and cognitive skills in preschool-aged children.

The main goal of the study was to examine how coordinative exercises improve physical fitness and motor competence in preschool children. Additionally, the study explored the impact of these exercises on inhibitory control, a cognitive skill related to attention and impulse control. Inhibitory control is especially important during the preschool years, as it directly affects children's learning processes and social interactions, serving as a key component of executive functions.

Research Protocol and Exercise Intervention

This study was conducted with 41 children, who were randomly assigned to two groups: an exercise group and a control group. The exercise group participated in an 8-week program, consisting of 30-minute sessions twice a week. The program was designed to improve various motor skills such as balance, hand-eye coordination, jumping, and locomotor abilities through play-based activities. The control group continued with their regular school curriculum without additional physical activity interventions.

The exercise protocol included open-ended tasks that progressively moved from simple to complex, requiring movement planning. These play-based exercises aimed to create an engaging and active environment in which children could participate socially. The coordinative exercises focused on supporting a wide range of motor movements and control mechanisms, encouraging the coordination of different body components in harmony.

Assessed Parameters

In the study, children's physical fitness, motor competence, and inhibitory control were assessed both before and after the intervention:

Physical fitness was measured through tests of balance, agility, and vertical jumping.

Motor competence was evaluated using the KTK3+ test battery, which includes tasks such as hand-eye coordination, balancing, and jumping sideways.

Inhibitory control was measured using the Go/No-Go test from the Early Years Toolbox, assessing how well children manage attention and control impulses.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

41

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Suleymanpasa
      • Tekirdag, Suleymanpasa, Turkey, 59030
        • Tekirdag Namik Kemal University, Sports Sciences Research and Development Centre

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Typically developing children
  • Participants must not be taking medication
  • Must not have any cardiovascular, neurological, orthopaedic or psychiatric disease
  • Must be between 5-6 years of age

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Having any cardiovascular, neurological, orthopaedic or psychiatric disease
  • Having intellectual disability
  • Not being between 5-6 years old

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Other
  • Allocation: Non-Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Coordinative exercise protocol
coordinative exercise group
During the eight-week period, all children in the structured coordinative exercise intervention group participated in 30-minute sessions twice a week on the same day and time. The purpose-oriented basic movement patterns created in the coordinative exercise content were organised in a play-oriented manner suitable for the preschool age range.
No Intervention: control group
The control group continued the standard education curriculum in kindergarten and did not receive any intervention

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Changes in Motor Competence: KTK3+ Backward Balancing (number of repetitions)
Time Frame: before and at the end of the 8-week intervention.

Backward balancing is a component of the Körperkoordinationstest für Kinder (KTK3+) motor competence test battery. This test measures the ability to maintain balance while moving backwards on a balance beam.

Unit of Measurement: number of repetitions (number of backward steps).

before and at the end of the 8-week intervention.
Changes in Motor Competence: KTK3+ Move Sideways (Number of repetitions within 20 seconds)
Time Frame: before and at the end of the 8-week intervention.

Move Sideways, is a component of the Körperkoordinationstest für Kinder (KTK3+) motor competence test battery. This test evaluates the ability to perform coordinated sideways movements.

Unit of Measurement: Repetitions (Number of repetitions within 20 seconds).

before and at the end of the 8-week intervention.
Changes in Motor Competence: KTK3+ Jumping Sideways (Number of repetitions within 15 seconds)
Time Frame: before and at the end of the 8-week intervention.

jumping sideways is a component of the Körperkoordinationstest für Kinder (KTK3+) motor competence test battery. This test measures the ability to perform coordinated sideways jumps.

Unit of Measurement: Repetitions (number of repetitions within 15 seconds)

before and at the end of the 8-week intervention.
Changes in Motor Competence: KTK3+ Eye-Hand Coordination Task (Number of repetitions within 30 seconds)
Time Frame: before and at the end of the 8-week intervention.

Eye-Hand Coordination is a component of the Körperkoordinationstest für Kinder (KTK3+) motor competence test battery. This task measures the ability to coordinate visual input with manual responses. It is a measurement method that involves throwing a tennis ball against a wall from a certain distance and holding it with the other hand.

Unit of Measurement: Number of correct repetitions in 30 seconds.

before and at the end of the 8-week intervention.
Changes in Counter Movement Jump Performance, (Highest jump height (cm))
Time Frame: before and at the end of the 8-week intervention.

Counter Movement Jump Performance was assessed using an accelerometer system (IVMES Athlete, Ankara, Turkey).

Unit of Measurement: Centimeter (cm) - Highest jump height

before and at the end of the 8-week intervention.
Changes in Balance Performance - Static Balance (%)
Time Frame: before and at the end of the 8-week intervention.

Balance performance was assessed with a static balance task using a movable platform (Sensbalance MiniBoard; Sensamove®, Utrecht, The Netherlands) that can be connected to a computer.

Unit of Measurement: Automatically calculated scores in % were used.

before and at the end of the 8-week intervention.
Changes in Balance Performance - Dynamic Balance (%)
Time Frame: before and at the end of the 8-week intervention.

Balance performance was assessed with a dynamic balance task using a moving platform (Sensbalance MiniBoard; Sensamove®, Utrecht, The Netherlands) that can be connected to a computer.

Unit of Measurement: Automatically calculated scores in % were used.

before and at the end of the 8-week intervention.
Changes in Agility (time to complete the test - in seconds)
Time Frame: before and at the end of the 8-week intervention.
It was evaluated using the Pro-Agility Test. Unit of Measurement: Seconds (s) - Time to complete the test
before and at the end of the 8-week intervention.
Changes in Inhibitory Control
Time Frame: before and at the end of the 8-week intervention.

Inhibitory control was assessed using the Go/No-Go test in the Early Years Toolbox, which measures the ability to suppress inappropriate responses.

Unit of Measurement: Number of Correct Responses and reaction time of the number of correct responses (ms).

before and at the end of the 8-week intervention.

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

January 20, 2023

Primary Completion (Actual)

February 25, 2023

Study Completion (Actual)

June 29, 2023

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

September 20, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 7, 2024

First Posted (Actual)

October 8, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

October 8, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 7, 2024

Last Verified

October 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • NamikemalU

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Plan Description

We plan to share the following individual participant data (IPD) from our study:

Measurements: Data obtained from Physical Fitness, Motor Competence and Inhibitor control parameters will be shared.

Data Anonymization: All shared IPD will be fully anonymized to protect participant privacy. Personal identifiers such as names, addresses, and contact information will be removed. Data will be aggregated where necessary to prevent re-identification of participants.

Data Format: The data will be shared in a secure, standardized format (e.g., CSV or Excel files) to facilitate ease of use and analysis by other researchers.

Access Control: Access to the shared IPD will be granted to qualified researchers who provide a valid research proposal and agree to comply with data use agreements that ensure the data will be used solely for research purposes and not for commercial gain.

IPD Sharing Time Frame

Beginning 1 year after publication with no end date

IPD Sharing Access Criteria

Access Control: Access to the shared IPD will be granted to qualified researchers who provide a valid research proposal and agree to comply with data use agreements that ensure the data will be used solely for research purposes and not for commercial gain.

IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type

  • STUDY_PROTOCOL

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Motor Skills

Clinical Trials on Coordinative exercise protocol

Subscribe