- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT06632418
Evaluating an rhPDGF-BB-enhanced Collagen Plug for Perianal Fistula Healing
A Randomized Controlled Trial Evaluating the Safety and Feasibility of the Recombinant Human Platelet-derived Growth Factor B (rhPDGF-BB)-Enhanced Collagen Plug for Complex Perianal Fistula Healing
Study Overview
Status
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Perianal fistula is a common colorectal condition with an incidence of 9 cases per 100,000. Most perianal fistulas originate from an anal abscess that does not heal properly and are mainly treated with surgical interventions. The type of surgery and healing rates depend on the classification of the fistula as simple or complex and the proportion of the sphincter muscle that is involved. The second most common cause of perianal fistula is due to Crohn's disease (CD), a chronic inflammatory disease with an estimated annual incidence of 3 to 20 cases per 100,000. Approximately 20% of patients with CD will develop a perianal fistula within 10 years of diagnosis. CD-related perianal fistulas are a severe complication of chronic intestinal inflammation and rely on the combination of pharmacological therapies and surgical interventions, but still one-third of CD-related fistulas remain unhealed.
This Phase II clinical trial will evaluate the performance, preliminary safety and efficacy, and feasibility of the rhPDGF-BB-enhanced collagen plug versus routine care on healing complex perianal fistulas that are not eligible for a fistulotomy. This prospective, blinded, single-site study will randomize participants, 2:1 intervention versus control, into two arms comparing the rhPDGF-BB-enhanced collagen plug to routine care procedures and stratify participants by fistula etiology, Crohn's or idiopathic. Routine care includes draining seton removal and natural healing for Crohn's fistulas or COOK Biotech's Biodesign® Anal Fistula Plug implant for idiopathic fistulas. For both non-CD (idiopathic) and CD-related fistulas, a loose seton is an effective first-line treatment to facilitate drainage of the abscess, prevent the recurrence of an abscess, and increase the chance of healing successfully. After seton placement, the therapeutic interventions for idiopathic and CD-related fistulas differ, and the overall healing rates are widely variable in the literature. The outcomes for CD-related perianal fistulas with seton intervention report success rates between 14-81% and idiopathic perianal fistulas with anal fistula plug intervention are highly similar with success rates between 15.8-72.7%.
After recruiting and consenting, participants will be randomized and scheduled for the baseline procedure. Randomization blocks of size 3 (2:1 intervention to control) within each stratum (idiopathic versus CD-related) will be utilized, and the patient will be blinded. The investigator will not be blinded because the control and intervention procedures are different. Following the baseline procedure, participants will return for outcomes assessment by a blinded physician at one month, three months, and six months and complete a weekly participant survey from home. At each study visit, the blinded physician will perform a clinical examination of the external opening to assess for inflammation, drainage, and epithelialization, take clinical photographs, and discuss any adverse events (1-month and 3-month visits only). At the 3-month study visit, the blinded physician will determine if the fistula has completely healed, and this will be documented in the study database. At the 6-month final study visit, the blinded physician will assess for recurrence of the fistula by examination of the external opening, and this will be documented in the study database.
If the fistula is not healing at the 3-month study visit and the participant is in the control arm of the study, they will reach their endpoint as a control and have the option to crossover to the investigational arm and receive the investigational intervention. These participants will first have another draining seton placed in their fistula tract for approximately 3 weeks and be scheduled for the intervention procedure, implantation of the rhPDGF-BB-enhanced collagen plug. This group will restart at visit 2 for the procedure and return for all post-procedural study visits 3-5 at 1-, 3-, and 6-months. Their outcome measures will be tracked and documented, and they will complete the weekly participant surveys, but their results will not be included in the initial analyses of the original randomized participant data. This will be considered extended open-label use of the investigational intervention and will not delay reporting the outcomes from the comparison of healing between the original intervention and control groups at 3 months. Their outcome measures will be analyzed and reported separately.
The natural history and actual case-counts of these two patient populations, idiopathic and CD-related complex perianal fistulas, guided the design of the objectives, outcomes, and sample size that would allow this pilot study to be completed in approximately 15 months. A small, 2:1 randomized, parallel arm design was chosen for the purposes of evaluating preliminary performance, safety, efficacy, and feasibility. The primary objective of this study is to evaluate the technical performance of the rhPDGF-BB-enhanced collagen plug for the treatment of complex perianal fistulas regardless of etiology. This outcome measure is defined as procedural success of the rhPDGF-enhanced collagen plug without any intervention-related serious adverse events. Procedural complications include but are not limited to acute infection, dislodgement or extrusion of the plug, and non-healing of the fistula tract. The secondary objectives that are focused on the potential efficacy of this treatment will include a stratified subgroup analyses for idiopathic and CD-related fistulas due to the differences in natural history and potential differences in outcomes with routine care in these two groups. Further, the stratified, randomized design will promote balance of the etiologies across the trial arms. For this pilot, published data and the investigator's real-world experience with healing in these patients were used to design the objectives and outcomes that will guide a larger more definitive follow-up trial where assessing efficacy may or may not include both etiologies. Given the number of different perianal fistula types, anatomical presentations, and approaches to treatment, the inclusion criteria are specific to fistulas that are a single continuous tract, have had a draining seton placed, and are not amenable to fistulotomy regardless of etiology. The study design, control groups, and inclusion criteria support the endpoint analyses at 1-, 3-, and 6-months post intervention based on historical data for healing, remission, and recurrence of perianal fistulas.
Study Type
Enrollment (Estimated)
Phase
- Phase 2
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
Tennessee
-
Nashville, Tennessee, United States, 37203
- Vanderbilt University Medical Center
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Adult
- Older Adult
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Diagnosis of a single tract perianal fistula not amenable to fistulotomy as determined by the supervising surgeon
- Fistula must currently have a draining seton in place
- Aged >21 years old
- Willing and able to provide informed consent and to comply with study protocol and follow-up
- Stated willingness to comply with all study procedures and availability for the duration of the study
Exclusion Criteria:
- Medical conditions that would, in the opinion of the investigator or treating provider, compromise the safety of the individual with study participation and/or the ability of the individual to follow study protocol
- Genito-urinary fistulization, including rectovaginal (i.e., fistulas that transverse the vaginal canal)
- Presence of an ileal anal pouch
- Any major surgery of the gastrointestinal tract (including one or more segments of the colon or terminal ileum) within 3 months prior to randomization; presence of stoma is not exclusionary
- Prior surgical procedure (i.e., Ligation of Intersphincteric Fistula Tract or Endorectal Advancement Flap) for the target fistula or a perianal procedure that resulted in a large soft tissue defect within 6 months prior to screening visit
- One or more of the following fistula types or anatomic presentations: horseshoe fistulas, fistulas that do not have an opening inside the anal canal or low rectum, blind ending sinus tracts (no external opening), branching fistulas (a previously performed conversion of a branching fistula tract to a single tract is not exclusionary), >1 internal opening, moderate or severe proctitis, severe rectal mucosal fibrosis surrounding the internal opening preventing the securing of the fistula plug disk, any anatomical limitation to successfully securing the fistula plug disk.
- Known allergic reactions to porcine collagen or yeast-derived products
- Currently enrolled in a drug or device trial or within 30 days of last investigational drug or device administration at baseline visit where investigational treatment (drug or device) was placed in or near the fistula tract or may potentially interact with study treatment
- Women who are pregnant, breastfeeding, or planning to become pregnant during the trial
- Active infection at the application site
- The presence of malignant neoplasms at the application site
- Prior radiation therapy at the application site
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Triple
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
No Intervention: Routine care
Participants receive routine care for their fistula.
|
|
|
Experimental: rhPDGF-BB-enhanced collagen plug
Participants receive collagen plug saturated with rhPDGF-BB.
|
0.3 mg/mL rhPDGF-BB
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants Without Treatment-Related Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) at 3 Months
Time Frame: Month 3
|
Proportion of participants with procedural success as defined by implantation of the device without device-related SAEs.
|
Month 3
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants Recruited and Eligible
Time Frame: Monthly up to month 15
|
Total number of participants that were recruited and eligible for the study.
|
Monthly up to month 15
|
|
Number of Participants Randomized Per Month
Time Frame: Monthly up to month 15
|
Number of participants that were randomized each month of the study.
|
Monthly up to month 15
|
|
Number of Participants Who Achieved Fistula Healing at 3 Months
Time Frame: Month 3
|
Fistula healing is a binary endpoint (healed or not healed) that will be determined by an evaluation from the blinded physician confirming whether there is visible drainage from the external opening.
|
Month 3
|
|
Number of Participants With Fistula Recurrence at 6 Months
Time Frame: Month 6
|
A participant that was diagnosed with a healed fistula that is diagnosed with recurrence of the fistula by clinical evaluation of the external opening at the 6-month follow-up visit.
|
Month 6
|
|
Change from Baseline in Symptoms at Week 24
Time Frame: From enrollment to week 24
|
Weekly self-reported participant surveys assessing the prevalence of perianal fistula-related symptoms (including pain, incontinence, and missed days of school or work).
|
From enrollment to week 24
|
|
Change from Baseline in Pain on an 11-Point Scale at Week 24
Time Frame: From enrollment to week 24
|
Weekly self-reported participant surveys will be assessing average pain intensity through an 11-point scale.
Possible scores range from 0 (No Pain) to 10 (Worst Pain).
|
From enrollment to week 24
|
|
Change from Baseline in Incontinence on a 5-Point Scale at week 24
Time Frame: From enrollment to week 24
|
Weekly self-reported participant surveys measuring incontinence with 5 questions (adapted from Wexner Incontinence Score) using a 5-point ordinal scale from 0 (Never) to 4 (Always (once or more per day)).
|
From enrollment to week 24
|
|
Proportion of Participants Retained at 3 and 6 Months
Time Frame: Month 3 and month 6
|
Proportion of participants retained in the study at the 3 month and 6 month endpoints.
|
Month 3 and month 6
|
|
Summary of Device-Related Adverse Events (AEs)
Time Frame: Month 3
|
A quantitative and descriptive summary of all device-related AEs.
Relationship to study intervention will be assessed by the clinician who examines and evaluates the participant based on temporal relationship and his/her clinical judgment.
|
Month 3
|
Other Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Crossover Outcomes
Time Frame: Month 3
|
The proportion of crossover participants that are completely healed at 3-months following the investigational procedure.
|
Month 3
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Collaborators
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Alexander T Hawkins, Vanderbilt University Medical Center
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Primary Completion (Estimated)
Study Completion (Estimated)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
- Pathological Conditions, Anatomical
- Intestinal Diseases
- Digestive System Diseases
- Gastrointestinal Diseases
- Rectal Diseases
- Digestive System Fistula
- Fistula
- Intestinal Fistula
- Pathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms
- Rectal Fistula
- Osteogenesis Imperfecta, Type IV
- Peptides
- Amino Acids, Peptides, and Proteins
- Proteins
- Biological Factors
- Intercellular Signaling Peptides and Proteins
- DNA-Binding Proteins
- Proto-Oncogene Proteins c-sis
- Platelet-Derived Growth Factor
- Becaplermin
Other Study ID Numbers
- 240585
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Anal Fistula
-
Cairo UniversityRecruiting
-
Sixth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen UniversityCompletedAnal Fistula | Anal Fistula SurgeryChina
-
Zagazig UniversityCompletedTranssphincteric Anal FistulaEgypt
-
Assiut UniversityNot yet recruitingAnal Fistula | Surgery Timing | Anal Fistula Surgery
-
National and Kapodistrian University of AthensRecruitingAnal Fistula | Perianal Fistula | Anal Fistula SurgeryGreece
-
Cairo UniversityRecruiting
-
F Care Systems NVRecruiting
-
Chinese University of Hong KongTerminated
-
Societa Italiana di Chirurgia ColoRettaleTerminated
-
Mansoura UniversityUnknownVideo Assisted Anal Fistula TreatmentEgypt
Clinical Trials on RhPDGF-BB
-
University of MichiganCompletedPeriodontitisUnited States
-
NYU Langone HealthNational Institutes of Health (NIH); Genzyme, a Sanofi CompanyWithdrawn
-
University of Alabama at BirminghamActive, not recruitingBone LossUnited States
-
BioMimetic TherapeuticsCompletedLateral EpicondylitisUnited States
-
Lynch Biologics LLCMedelis Inc.; Centro Medico MilitarUnknown
-
Universidad Autonoma de Nuevo LeonLifeNet Health; Lynch Biologics LLCRecruitingPeriodontal DiseasesMexico
-
Chinese University of Hong KongUnknown
-
Basking Biosciences, Inc.CompletedHealthy Volunteers | Pharmacokinetics | PharmacodynamicsAustralia
-
G. d'Annunzio UniversityRecruitingPeriodontal Diseases | Intrabony Periodontal Defect | Periodontal Attachment Loss | Pocket, PeriodontalAlbania
-
Vanderbilt University Medical CenterLynch Regenerative Medicine, LLCRecruitingSurgical Wound | Wound HealingUnited States