Crown Lengthening in Aesthetic Anterior Sector by Means of Guided Digital Planning: Ramdomized Controlled Clinical Trial.

October 7, 2024 updated by: Universidad Complutense de Madrid

Crown Lengthening in Aesthetic Anterior Sector by Means of Guided Digital Planning: 12-month Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial Comparing the Efficacy of Digital Versus Analog Protocol.

The objective of this research is to compare the diagnostic accuracy in the detection of the cementoenamel junction (CEJ) and alveolar bone ridge using guided digital planning versus conventional analog planning for patients with excessive gingival exposure in the smile (gummy smile) due, at least in part, to altered passive eruption.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Forty-four subjects will be randomly assigned to the planning groups according to a digital methodology, DM (n=22) or an analog methodology AM (n=22). Surgical guides will be developed to establish the location of the acementoenamel junction and bone crest. The digital methodology will consist of obtaining a digital scan and a computed tomography (CBCT) that will be aligned using a digital program for the elaboration of a digital wax-up and fabrication of a printed surgical template. The analog wax-up will be elaborated based on a silicone impression and periapical radiographs with parallel technique, which will allow us to elaborate an essix type surgical splint. Measurements will be recorded at baseline, on the day of surgery, at 4, 6 and 12 months of follow-up. Variables related to the patient's experience will also be recorded.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

44

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

  • Name: Georgina Carbajo, DDS,MSc
  • Phone Number: +34 660437502
  • Email: geocarba@ucm.es

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

      • Madrid, Spain, 28040
        • Recruiting
        • Universidad Complutense de Madrid, Dentistry department
        • Contact:
          • Georgina Carbajo, DDS,MSc
          • Phone Number: +34 660437502
          • Email: geocarba@ucm.es
        • Contact:
          • Georgina Carbajo, DDS,MSc
        • Contact:
          • Mariano Sanz Alonso, MD,DDS,MSc,PhD
        • Contact:
          • Gustavo Avila, DDS,MSc
        • Contact:
          • Oscar Gonzalez, DDS,MSc

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Over 18 years of age
  • Presence of teeth in the second sextant (edentulous section of a single tooth with the presence of adjacent teeth on both sides of the absence is accepted).
  • No sites with attachment loss (AL) > 3 mm in the area to be treated (second sextant).
  • Present full mouth plaque index (Ainamo and Bay, 1975) <15%.
  • Have bleeding on probing (BoP; Ainamo & Bay 1975) <15%.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • pregnancy or lactation
  • patients who smoke
  • patients under treatment with antimicrobials and anti-inflammatory drugs in the last 2 months or with medications associated with changes in the gingival tissue (antiepileptics, calcium channel blockers, etc.)
  • subjects with systemic conditions that alter the normal presentation of the gingival tissue (hereditary gingival fibromatosis) or those diagnosed with uncontrolled diabetes mellitus
  • patients with severe dental malposition and/or presence of dental implants in the area to be treated
  • use of orthodontic appliances
  • all those who present a disability or mental disorders that make it difficult for the patient to understand or follow them during the study period. study period.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Diagnostic
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Digital plannig
The digital methodology will consist of obtaining a digital scan and a computed tomography (CBCT) that will be aligned using a digital program for the elaboration of a digital wax-up and fabrication of a printed surgical template.
Active Comparator: Analogic planning
The analog wax-up will be elaborated based on a silicone impression and periapical radiographs with parallel technique, which will allow us to elaborate an essix-type surgical splint.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
The accuracy of surgical guide.
Time Frame: 12 months
The accuracy of surgical guide to detect the cementoenamel junction and position of the alveolar bone crest: distance from the splint margin to the CEJ measured intra-surgically in mm at 3 points per tooth using a CP-15 periodontal probe (Hu Friedy®, Leimen, Germany).
12 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
The stability of the crown length
Time Frame: 12 months
The stability of the crown length established over a 12-month period (tissue rebound) measured at 3 points per tooth with a CP-15 millimeter periodontal probe and by intraoral digital scanning.
12 months
Patient's phenotype
Time Frame: 12 months
Therapeutic response according to the patient's phenotype, based on the transparency of the periodontal probe CP-15 (Hu Friedy®, Leimen, Germany) through the gingival margin while probing the buccal sulcus, according to the classification of Rouck et al 2009.
12 months
The number of teeth and patients in which the second phase was necessary.
Time Frame: 12 months
The number of teeth and patients in which the second phase was necessary and the amount of removal of keratinized tissue (gingivectomy) in the second phase (at 4 months) in millimeters using a CP-15 millimeter periodontal probe.
12 months
The time spent
Time Frame: 12 months
The time spent in digital/analog recording in minutes.
12 months
Patient satisfaction
Time Frame: 12 months
Patient satisfaction according to the validated survey (Oral Health Impact Profile OHIP-14).
12 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

February 1, 2024

Primary Completion (Estimated)

June 1, 2025

Study Completion (Estimated)

June 1, 2026

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

July 8, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 7, 2024

First Posted (Estimated)

October 9, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimated)

October 9, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 7, 2024

Last Verified

February 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 24/160-E

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Insufficient Clinical Crown Length

Clinical Trials on Digital planning

Subscribe