Supplemental Screening for Women With Extremely Dense Breast Tissue: the DENSE-2 Trial (DENSE-2)

May 6, 2026 updated by: C.H. van Gils

Contrast-enhanced Mammography and Abbreviated MRI as Supplemental Screening Modalities for Women Aged 50-75 With Extremely Dense Breast Tissue: the DENSE-2 Trial

Women with extremely dense breasts (nearly all glandular and connective tissue, little fatty tissue) have a 3-6 times higher risk of breast cancer than women with very low breast density. Moreover, due to the masking effect of the dense tissue, any breast tumours present are more difficult to detect in these women. With the results of the DENSE trial, the investigators showed that among women with extremely dense breasts, a combination of MRI and mammography could detect tumours earlier than mammography only. As the implementation of MRI in the screening program induces considerable costs and capacity requirements, the Dutch Ministry of Health would like to investigate whether cheaper and acceptable alternatives can be implemented more easily. In the DENSE-2 study, proposed here, we will investigate contrast-enhanced mammography and an abbreviated form of MRI as alternatives, in a large-scale randomized trial, within the current population-based screening program.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Women with extremely dense breast tissue have a higher risk of developing breast cancer and at the same time, mammography has limited value for these women. Currently, these women are not offered supplemental screening. Therefore, the investigators of the DENSE-2 trial will study supplemental CEM and AB-MRI screening in women with extremely dense breast tissue within the population-based breast cancer screening program because these modalities are expected to have higher diagnostic accuracy than tomosynthesis and ultrasound. In addition, these modalities are expected to be less expensive and require less capacity than a full MRI protocol as examined in the DENSE trial. For both CEM and AB-MRI, no results are currently available from a prospective screening study. The DENSE-2 trial is a randomized controlled trial comparing two intervention arms (CEM [intervention arm A] and abbreviated MRI [intervention arm B]) each with mammography [control arm C].

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

36000

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Participant in the Dutch population-based breast cancer screening program with a negative mammography result (BI-RADS classification 1 or 2).
  • Extremely dense breast tissue (assessed with Quantra software, category D).
  • Age between 49-72 years (women are invited to the Dutch screening program in the year they turn 50, so the minimum age is 49 years. The maximum age for inclusion is 72 years to ensure that women can still participate in a second round of supplemental screening).
  • Living in the service area (travel distance of up to 60 km) of the 15 participating hospitals.
  • Absence of breast implants (Quantra cannot provide an accurate density determination for breasts with implants).
  • No objection to data sharing.
  • Not a participant in the DENSE trial or STREAM trial (participants in the DENSE and STREAM trials are known to the Dutch screening organization).

Exclusion Criteria:

The additional exclusion criteria for the intervention arms are checked after randomization and recruitment (this order is due to the pre-randomization design):

  • Presence of in-body metals (only for AB-MRI, this involves specific metals and is asked by telephone).
  • Previous allergic reaction to the provided contrast agent.
  • Renal insufficiency (glomerular filtration rate <30 ml/min) (only for CEM, is checked for with questionnaire I and possibly renal function measurement).
  • Severe claustrophobia (only for AB-MRI).
  • Severe obesity (weight >150 kg) (only for AB-MRI).

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Screening
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
No Intervention: Control
This group receives biennial mammography only within the current Dutch National Breast Cancer Screening program. This group will not be informed about the study (pre-randomisation design)
Experimental: Contrast-enhanced Mammography (CEM)
This group receives supplemental screening with CEM after a negative mammography result in the Dutch National Breast Cancer screening program
This intervention group receives supplemental screening with CEM after a negative screening result within the Dutch National Breast Cancer Screening program
Experimental: Abbreviated MRI (AB-MRI)
This group receives supplemental screening with AB-MRI after a negative mammography result in the Dutch National Breast Cancer Screening program
This intervention group receives supplemental screening with AB-MRI after a negative screening result within the Dutch National Breast Cancer Screening program

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Interval Cancer Rate
Time Frame: 0 - 3 year
Measured as a breast cancer diagnosed in between two screening rounds
0 - 3 year

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Cancer detection rate
Time Frame: 0 - 3 year
The number of breast cancers detected by CEM or AB-MRI
0 - 3 year
False positive rate
Time Frame: 0-5 year
The number with a false positive result after CEM or AB-MRI
0-5 year
Participant experience with CEM - 1
Time Frame: 0-5 year
screen-specific item questionnaire (SSI)
0-5 year
Participant experience with CEM - 2
Time Frame: 0-5 year
Self-developed questionnaire
0-5 year
Participant experience with CEM - 3
Time Frame: 0-5 year
Focus group interviews
0-5 year
Participant experience with AB-MRI - 1
Time Frame: 0-5 year
screen-specific item questionnaire (SSI)
0-5 year
Participant experience with AB-MRI - 2
Time Frame: 0-5 year
Self-developed questionnaire
0-5 year
Participant experience with AB-MRI - 3
Time Frame: 0-5 year
Focus group interviews
0-5 year
Health-professional experience with CEM
Time Frame: 0-5 year
Self-developed questionnaire
0-5 year
Health-professional experience with AB-MRI
Time Frame: 0-5 year
Self-developed questionnaire
0-5 year
Estimated rate of overdiagnosis
Time Frame: 0-5 years
Simulation with the MISCAN software
0-5 years
Cost-effectiveness
Time Frame: 0-5 year
Simulation with the MISCAN software
0-5 year
Breast tumor size
Time Frame: 0-5 years
mm
0-5 years
Breast tumor stage
Time Frame: 0-5 years
TNM classification
0-5 years
Positive Predictive Value (PPV)
Time Frame: 0-5 year
Using the histological diagnosis as the reference test
0-5 year
Biopsy rate
Time Frame: 0-5 year
Per 1000 women screened with one of the modalities
0-5 year
Referral rate
Time Frame: 0-5 years
Per 1000 women screened per screening modality
0-5 years
Mortality rate
Time Frame: 0-5 year
Simulation with MISCAN software
0-5 year
Advanced Cancer detectio Advanced Cancer rate
Time Frame: 0 - 3 year
Advanced cancer is defined as TNM stage II or higher
0 - 3 year

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

November 11, 2024

Primary Completion (Estimated)

December 31, 2029

Study Completion (Estimated)

September 1, 2031

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

October 3, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 9, 2024

First Posted (Actual)

October 10, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

May 11, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 6, 2026

Last Verified

May 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 05550412310002
  • Nr. 2024/09 (Other Identifier: Dutch Health Council)

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

UNDECIDED

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Breast Cancer

Clinical Trials on Contrast-enhanced mammography (CEM)

Subscribe