Effect of Anodal Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation on Postdural Puncture Headache

March 28, 2025 updated by: Diego Centonze, Neuromed IRCCS

Effect of Anodal Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation on Postdural Puncture Headache: Results of Two Randomized Sham - Controlled Trials

Post-dural puncture headache (PDPH) is the most prevalent complication in patients undergoing diagnostic or therapeutic lumbar puncture (LP). The pathophysiology of PDPH is primarily attributed to the mechanical traction on pain-sensitive intracranial nerves (e.g., the upper cervical, 5th, 9th, and 10th cranial nerves) and vascular structures, mediated by persistent dural damage leading to cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leakage and subsequent CSF pressure reduction.

According to the International Classification of Headache Disorders 3rd edition (ICHD3), PDPH is classified as a headache subtype due to low CSF pressure. It typically manifests as an orthostatic headache within a few days post-LP, accompanied by symptoms such as neck pain, tinnitus, auditory changes, photophobia, and nausea. While PDPH usually resolves within 7-10 days, it can result in extended hospital stays and increased need for medication. The use of atraumatic needles is the most effective preventive measure for PDPH, though other commonly recommended practices such as bed rest, fluid administration, and caffeine have questionable efficacy.

Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) is a non-invasive brain stimulation (NIBS) technique that applies low-voltage electrical currents through surface electrodes on the scalp. Depending on the stimulation type-anodal or cathodal-tDCS can induce long-lasting increases or decreases in neuronal excitability and vascular-neuronal activity coupling. Research has shown that anodal tDCS (a-tDCS) applied to the primary motor cortex (M1) can alleviate various pain conditions, including fibromyalgia, neuropathic pain, and headaches. The pain-relieving effects of M1 a-tDCS are believed to follow the modulation of intracortical inhibitory GABAergic transmission, and the descending connections from M1 to the thalamus and periaqueductal gray.

Although short-term a-tDCS treatment has shown promise in preventing migraines and medication-overuse headaches, its role in preventing and treating PDPH remains unexplored. This study aims to evaluate the efficacy of preventive and therapeutic a-tDCS applied to M1 in patients undergoing diagnostic LP.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

97

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Isernia
      • Pozzilli, Isernia, Italy, 86077
        • IRCCS Neuromed

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • age between 18 and 75 years;
  • indication to undergo diagnostic lumbar puncture LP.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • any prior exposure to brain stimulation;
  • contraindications to tDCS;
  • a previous diagnosis of migraine or chronic headache;
  • usage of preventive medication at the baseline assessment;
  • history of depression
  • obesity
  • multiple lumbar puncture LP attempts.
  • cognitive impairment

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Sequential Assignment
  • Masking: Triple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: therapeutic a-tDCS (Th-tDCS)
In patients diagnosed with PDPH, three consecutive days of active a-tDCS intervention are performed starting from the day of diagnosis.

Active in therapeutic tDCS (Th-tDCS) in patients diagnosed with PDPH. The stimulations were delivered using a battery-driven direct current stimulator (HDCstim-DC stimulator, Newronika S.r.l. Milano - Italy). The current was administered through a pair of saline-soaked surface electrodes. The anode, measuring 3x3 cm, was placed over the primary motor cortex (M1) in the dominant hemisphere. This location was identified using the International 10-20 EEG system for C3 (left M1) or C4 (right M1). The cathode, measuring 6x4 cm, was positioned over the contralateral supraorbital region, immediately below the Fp position.

In the active a-tDCS groups, each session consisted of 20 minutes stimulation with a 2 mA intensity for 3 consecutive days.

Sham Comparator: sham in therapeutic t-DCS (Th-tDCS)
In patients diagnosed with PDPH, three consecutive days of sham a-tDCS are performed starting from the day of diagnosis
Sham in therapeutic tDCS (Th-tDCS) in patients diagnosed with PDPH. In the sham tDCS groups, the duration and electrodes application were the same of active in therapeutic tDCS (Th-tDCS), but the current was stopped 30 s thereafter. The subject felt the initial itching sensation, but no changes in cortical excitability are produced
Experimental: preventive a-tDCS (Pr-tDCS)
Patients undergoing a lumbar puncture for diagnostic purposes receive an active a-tDCS intervention for three consecutive days.

Active in preventive tDCS (Pr-tDCS) in patients who have undergone a lumbar puncture for diagnostic purposes. The stimulations were delivered using a battery-driven direct current stimulator (HDCstim-DC stimulator, Newronika S.r.l. Milano - Italy). The current was administered through a pair of saline-soaked surface electrodes. The anode, measuring 3x3 cm, was placed over the primary motor cortex (M1) in the dominant hemisphere. This location was identified using the International 10-20 EEG system for C3 (left M1) or C4 (right M1). The cathode, measuring 6x4 cm, was positioned over the contralateral supraorbital region, immediately below the Fp position.

In the active a-tDCS groups, each session consisted of 20 minutes stimulation with a 2 mA intensity for 3 consecutive days.

Sham Comparator: sham in preventive tDCS (Pr-tDCS)
Patients undergoing a lumbar puncture for diagnostic purposes receive an sham tDCS for three consecutive days.
Sham in preventive tDCS (Pr-tDCS) in patients who have undergone a lumbar puncture for diagnostic purposes. In the sham tDCS groups, the duration and electrodes application were the same of active in preventive tDCS (Pr-tDCS), but the current was stopped 30 s thereafter. The subject felt the initial itching sensation, but no changes in cortical excitability are produced

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Visual Analogue Scale (VAS)
Time Frame: From enrollment to the end of treatment at 1 week

The primary outcome was to assess differences between the two groups in PDPH-related pain, evaluated using the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) and referred to pain intensity at that specific moment. The VAS is a self administered scale in which patients indicate the intensity of pain experienced by selecting a point on a continuous line ranging from 0 to 100 mm, representing the absence of pain to the worst pain, respectively. This scale is widely used in pain studies, with demonstrated validity and reproducibility. In the Th-tDCS study, VAS was administered at T0, before starting tDCS, and two hours before and two hours after the tDCS sessions (T1, T2, T3, T4, and T5).

In the Pr-tDCS study, VAS was administered each day at the end of tDCS sessions (T0, T1, and T2).

From enrollment to the end of treatment at 1 week

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Brief Pain Inventory (BPI)
Time Frame: From enrollment to the end of treatment at one week

As secondary outcome we analyzed the effects of tDCS on other pain-related symptoms associated with LP, evaluated using the Brief Pain Inventory (BPI). The BPI is a multidimensional measurement tool originally developed to assess the intensity and interference of pain in cancer patients. In this study, the BPI was used to assess painful symptoms associated with LP, evaluating both the intensity of pain and its interference with affective and activity aspects of the patient's daily life over the past 24 hours.

In the Th-tDCS study, the BPI was collected before starting tDCS (T0) and two hours after the last tDCS stimulation (T5). In the Pr-tDCS study, the BPI was collected before starting tDCS (T0) and two hours after the last stimulation (T2).

From enrollment to the end of treatment at one week

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

January 11, 2022

Primary Completion (Actual)

April 11, 2024

Study Completion (Actual)

April 23, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

October 8, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 11, 2024

First Posted (Actual)

October 15, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

April 2, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 28, 2025

Last Verified

October 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Postdural Puncture Headache

Clinical Trials on active in therapeutic tDCS (Th-tDCS): anodal transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (a-tDCS)

Subscribe