Comparison of Video Laryngoscopy and Macintosh Laryngoscopy in Pediatric Patients Undergoing Elective Surgery

October 14, 2024 updated by: Elzem SEN, University of Gaziantep

COMPARISON of VIDEO LARYNGOSCOPY and MACINTOSH LARYNGOSCOPY in PEDIATRIC PATIENTS UNDERGOING ELECTIVE SURGERY

In this study, we aimed to observe the intubation conditions in patients using Endolarenx video laryngoscope and Macintosh Blade in laryngoscopy to identify the advantages and disadvantages of using video laryngoscopy in pediatric patients.

Study Overview

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

100

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Gaziantep, Turkey, 27410
        • Gaziantep University

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Patients who underwent elective surgery at Gaziantep University.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • One hundred pediatric patients, aged under 18 years, weighing between 10-40 kg, and classified as American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) I-II-III risk group

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients with congenital airway deformities, patients with known or predicted difficult intubation, patients undergoing emergency surgery, patients classified above ASA III, and patients whose parents did not consent were excluded from the study

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Mean intubation time
Time Frame: The time from the entry of the laryngoscope into the oral cavity until the appearance of the EtCO2 trace on the capnograph.
The time from the entry of the laryngoscope into the oral cavity until the appearance of the EtCO2 trace on the capnograph.

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

April 1, 2022

Primary Completion (Actual)

June 1, 2022

Study Completion (Actual)

August 1, 2022

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

October 14, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 14, 2024

First Posted (Actual)

October 16, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

October 16, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 14, 2024

Last Verified

October 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 2022/100

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

UNDECIDED

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Pediatric Patients Undergoing Operation

Clinical Trials on videolaryngoscopy

Subscribe