Effect of Multisite High-definition Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation Targeting Sensorimotor Network

October 17, 2024 updated by: Raymond KY Tong, Chinese University of Hong Kong

Multisite High-definition Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation Targeting Sensorimotor Network Navigated by Task-based fMRI to Facilitate Motor Activation and Reorganization for Stroke

Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) has been applied to facilitate cortical excitability in stroke populations, as increasing evidence suggests that clinical recovery from stroke is attributed to neuroplastic reorganization. However, recovery from stroke following this kind of non-invasive neuromodulation remains divergent across stroke patients due to variations in their etiologies, lesion profiles and post-stroke duration.

A novel multisite high definition tDCS (HD-tDCS) in healthy people showed that such network-targeted stimulation could enhance motor excitability beyond conventional stimulation which targeting only one region. The electrode placements could be determined by the montage optimization, which targets individual motor network activation navigated by task-based fMRI using computation algorithms.

By targeting motor network, the new multisite electrode montage may provide a potential to facilitate better cortical activation than conventional tDCS montage.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) has been applied to facilitate cortical excitability in stroke populations, as increasing evidence suggests that clinical recovery from stroke is attributed to neuroplastic reorganization. However, recovery from stroke following this kind of non-invasive neuromodulation remains divergent across stroke patients due to variations in their etiologies, lesion profiles and post-stroke durations. In the stroke application of tDCS, most non-invasive brain stimulation studies have mainly focused on the modulation of the primary motor cortex (M1) in motor skill relearning. Previous studies have shown that not only the M1, which is the most important area associated with the motor system, but also other secondary motor areas (e.g., premotor cortex (PM) and supplementary motor area (SMA)) can be influenced by the onset of stroke. In fact, SMA activations and shifts in the M1 are commonly observed in stroke patients. However, brain regions do not operate in isolation, but communicate and interact with other discrete regions through networks. Conventional stimulations of one region (normally the M1 in stroke) have neglected the network impact and the changed motor network composition after stroke, which is often limited in stroke rehabilitation. A novel multisite high definition tDCS (HD-tDCS) in healthy people showed that such network-targeted stimulation could enhance motor excitability beyond conventional stimulation which targeting only one region. It showed that the excitability following multisite HD-tDCS was more than double the increase following conventional tDCS.

To consider the various lesion site and the different activation patterns of individual stroke survivors, personalized lesion profiles and anatomical features can be determined using finite element modelling, with lesion profiles generated from MRI and advanced algorithms calculating the current density to maximize the modulation effect. The electrode placements could be determined by the montage optimization, which targets individual motor network activation navigated by task-based fMRI using computation algorithms. By targeting motor network, the new multisite electrode montage may provide a potential to facilitate better cortical activation than conventional tDCS montage.

In this study, A randomized cross-over designed trial will be conducted to explore motor activation and reorganization changes before and after multisite HD-tDCS, conventional tDCS, and sham tDCS in stroke survivors. The stimulation effect will be evaluated by fMRI.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

30

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

      • Hong Kong, Hong Kong
        • Recruiting
        • Department of Biomedical Engineering, The Chinese University of Hong Kong
        • Contact:
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Raymond Kai-yu Tong, PhD

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child
  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. first-ever stroke, the duration after stroke exceeds 12 months;
  2. mild to moderate upper extremity motor function deficit, determined by the Fugl-meyer assessment of upper extremity (FMAUE) scores between 15 and 53;
  3. could voluntarily perform grasping hand movement.
  4. sufficient cognitive function to follow the assessment and experiment instructions.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. history of epilepsy, or any other contradictions of brain stimulation and MRI scanning;
  2. severe joint contracture of elbow or shoulder, or pain induced by any other neurological, neuromuscular, and orthopedic diseases.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Multisite HD-tDCS group

Device:

Constant current will be applied for 20min and the electrodes will be placed over the target area

5-8 MRI compatible electrodes (2 cm diameter) will be placed based on the neuroimaging and computation modelling. The electrodes will be placed inside MRI compatible sponges and affixed to the head using a device matched cap which will be filled with saline to have good contact with the scalp.
Sham Comparator: Sham stimulation group
The stimulator will be applied for 20 minutes with only 30s ramp-up and ramp-down stimulation delivered. The patients will feel the initial itching sensation at the beginning in order to evaluate the placebo effect.
5-8 MRI compatible electrodes (2 cm diameter) will be placed based on the neuroimaging and computation modelling. The electrodes will be placed inside MRI compatible sponges and affixed to the head using a device matched cap which will be filled with saline to have good contact with the scalp.
Active Comparator: Conventional tDCS Group
Constant current (2mA) will be applied for 20min and the anode will be placed over the standard C3/C4 position.
A pair of 25 cm2 rubber electrodes enclosed in saline-soaked sponges and affixed to the head with rubber bands.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Resting-state functional connectivity
Time Frame: before and immediately after stimulation
Functional magnetic resonance imaging for collecting BOLD signals during resting-state.
before and immediately after stimulation

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Fugl-Meyer Assessment
Time Frame: before experiment
Motor function assessment for stroke survivors
before experiment
task-based brain activation
Time Frame: before and immediately after stimulation
Functional magnetic resonance imaging for collecting BOLD signals during motor tasks.
before and immediately after stimulation

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Raymond Kai-yu Tong, PhD, Department of Biomedical Engineering, CUHK

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

August 13, 2022

Primary Completion (Estimated)

December 31, 2024

Study Completion (Estimated)

December 31, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

September 15, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 17, 2024

First Posted (Actual)

October 18, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

October 18, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 17, 2024

Last Verified

October 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Stroke

Clinical Trials on Conventional tDCS

Subscribe