High-definition Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation for Facilitating Hand Function Recovery After Stroke

September 3, 2021 updated by: Raymond KY Tong, Chinese University of Hong Kong

Using Neuroimage and Computational Modeling to Customize High-definition Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation Protocols for Facilitating Hand Function Recovery After Stroke

Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) had recently been shown having feasibility in modulating cortical excitability transiently during motor training in a noninvasive way. The findings support that tDCS and motor practice can positively promote post-stroke motor learning to improve upper-limb motor recovery after stroke. A randomized controlled trial will be conducted with three groups: HD-tDCS, conventional tDCS and sham HD-tDCS. A 10-session training will be provided to evaluate the effectiveness of transient modulation of cortical excitability through tDCS with clinical assessment scores.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

25

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Shatin, Hong Kong
        • Department of Biomedical Engineering, The Chinese University of Hong Kong

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Hemiparesis subsequent to first-ever unilateral stroke for more than 6 months;
  2. MCP and PIP finger joints can be extended to 180° passively;
  3. Sufficient cognition to follow the experimental instructions

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Severe hand spasticity or hand deformity;
  2. History of alcohol or drug abuse or epilepsy;
  3. Bilateral brain infarcts;
  4. Severe cognitive deficits;
  5. Comprehensive aphasia;
  6. Contraindications to tDCS

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: HD-tDCS group
Constant current (1mA) will be applied for 20min and the anode will be placed over the defined target area
5 sintered Ag/AgCl ring electrodes will be used at a radius of ~5cm. The electrodes will be placed inside plastic electrode holders which will be filled with gel to have better contact with the scalp.
Experimental: Conventional tDCS group
Constant current (1mA) will be applied for 20min and the anode will be placed over the standard C3/C4 position
A pair of 25 cm2 rubber electrodes enclosed in saline-soaked sponges and affixed to the head with rubber bands.
Sham Comparator: Sham HD-tDCS group
The stimulator will be shut down after 30s of stimulation. The patients will feel the initial itching sensation at the beginning in order to evaluate the placebo effect.
A pair of 25 cm2 rubber electrodes enclosed in saline-soaked sponges and affixed to the head with rubber bands.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Action Research Arm Test (ARAT)
Time Frame: 3-month after the 10th session training
The ARAT has total 19 items, divided into 4 categories (grasp, grip, pinch, and gross arm movement). It ranges from 3 to 0 (best to worse).
3-month after the 10th session training

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Fugl-Meyer Assessment (Upper Extremity)
Time Frame: 3-month after the 10th session training
The maximum score is 66, divided into 33 items in the form of a 3-point scale (0-2), 0 is cannot perform and 2 performs fully.
3-month after the 10th session training
Wolf Motor Function Test (WMFT)
Time Frame: 3-month after the 10th session training
The WMFT measures upper limb ability through timed and functional tasks. It has 17 items, ranging from 0 to 5 (worse to best).
3-month after the 10th session training
Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Time Frame: Baseline
Functional magnetic resonance imaging
Baseline

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

April 10, 2019

Primary Completion (Actual)

June 1, 2020

Study Completion (Actual)

June 1, 2020

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

March 13, 2019

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 13, 2019

First Posted (Actual)

March 15, 2019

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

September 13, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 3, 2021

Last Verified

September 1, 2021

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Stroke

Clinical Trials on HD-tDCS group

3
Subscribe