Desarda Tissue Technique vs Lichtenstein Technique for Primary Inguinal Hernia Repair (HP-tis)

Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing the Desarda Tissue Technique With the Lichtenstein Technique in Primary Inguinal Hernia Repair

This study aims to evaluate whether a surgical technique (Desarda) is superior to the commonly used surgical technique (Lichtenstein) in inguinal hernia repair concerning the occurrence of postoperative complications. The Lichtenstein technique involves the use of a mesh, while the Desarda technique does not.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

478

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

    • Barcelona
      • Sant Pere de Ribes, Barcelona, Spain, 08810
        • Recruiting
        • CSAPG
        • Contact:
        • Contact:
          • Noemi Casaponsa, recerca@csapg.cat
          • Phone Number: 43197 +34 938960025
          • Email: recerca@csapg.cat
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Javier Errando, MD

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Diagnosed with primary inguinal hernia.
  • Body mass index below 31
  • Indication for inguinal hernia repair via anterior approach, either as outpatient surgery (CMA) or elective admission.
  • Legal capacity to provide informed consent.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients with a weak, thin, or divided external oblique aponeurosis.
  • Participants diagnosed with any of the following conditions:

    • Ongoing oncological disease
    • Cirrhotic patients classified as Child B or higher
  • Women who have previously undergone a cesarean section
  • Cognitive or affective conditions that limit the ability to cooperate with the study procedures

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Triple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Desarda Technique
Patients asigned to this arm will be treated with Desarda Technique
This technique prevent from using a mesh to surgical repair of a inguinal hernia
Active Comparator: Lichtenstein Technique
Patients asigned to this arm will be treated with Lichtenstein Technique
This technique implies using a mesh to surgical repair of a inguinal hernia

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Rate of Participants with Post-surgery Complications
Time Frame: 3 months
Any of the following complications: ● Sensation of a foreign body that persists beyond 3 months after surgery, self-reported by the participant ● Seroma within the first 30 days after surgery, verified through physical examination by a surgeon ● Hematoma within the first 30 days after surgery, verified through physical examination by a surgeon ● Infection at the surgical site within the first 30 days after surgery, verified by a surgeon ● Severe postoperative pain (7 or higher on the visual analog scale [VAS]) within the first 30 days after surgery, self-reported by the participant ● Chronic postoperative pain (persisting more than three months after surgery), self-reported by the participant ● Persistent loss of skin sensitivity beyond 30 days after surgery, self-reported by the participant ● Limitation of normal activities at home, outside the home, or at work beyond 3 months after surgery, self-reported by the participant
3 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Javier Errando, MD, CSAPG

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

March 26, 2025

Primary Completion (Estimated)

December 1, 2027

Study Completion (Estimated)

December 1, 2030

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

October 18, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 18, 2024

First Posted (Actual)

October 21, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

June 24, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 18, 2025

Last Verified

June 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Plan Description

IPD (without personal identification data) could be shared by requirement from other researchers after the end of the study, and only for research purposes and previous approval of promotor center of the study (CSAPG). Anyway, Spanish and European Union legal policy about data protection will strictly be followed (IPD will not be transferred outside European Union).

IPD Sharing Time Frame

After publication of main results of the study.

IPD Sharing Access Criteria

IPD will be shared only for scientific research purposes and following the Spanish and European Union normative law about data protection. The requirements will be directed to the IP of the study. The IP will evaluate the request to verify and evaluate the data that is requested and the purposes for which it is requested. Next, the IP will transfer the request to the promotor center the study for the final decision.

IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type

  • STUDY_PROTOCOL
  • ICF

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Inguinal Hernia Unilateral

Clinical Trials on Desarda

Subscribe