Exogenous KETOne Supplements in Patients Hospitalized for Acute Heart Failure (KETO-AHF)

June 4, 2025 updated by: Aarhus University Hospital

Exogenous KETOne Supplements in Patients Hospitalized for Acute Heart Failure. A Randomized Clinical Trial (KETO-AHF)

This is a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial to investigate the clinical efficacy of treatment with exogenous dietary ketone supplement containing 1,3-butanediol in patients hospitalized with acute heart failure (AHF), potentially leading to better clinical outcomes.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Acute heart failure (AHF) is life-threatening with a 30-day mortality rate between 10% and 50%, especially in patients with cardiogenic shock. Current medical treatments have not shown a survival benefit in randomized trials, highlighting the need for new therapies. Ketone bodies, particularly 3-hydroxybutyrate (3-OHB), are vital for energy in the heart and brain during stress. Elevated 3-OHB levels from exogenous sources, such as ketone esters or 1,3-butanediol, enhance organ perfusion and improve cardiac function. In chronic heart failure (HF), 3-OHB infusion increases cardiac output and left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) without excess oxygen consumption, supporting its role as an efficient energy source. Short-term ketone ester treatment has been shown to improve hemodynamics, reduce NT-proBNP, and enhance physical performance in heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) patients. In AHF patients, ketone ester improved cardiac output, LVEF, and filling pressures. Emerging evidence suggests that 1,3-butanediol supplements may sustain ketosis longer, offering potential for practical dosing in the acute phase of heart failure.

This proposal aims to study the clinical efficacy of treatment with exogenous dietary ketone supplement containing 1,3-butanediol in patients hospitalized with AHF.

The primary hypothesis is that in patients hospitalized with AHF, a 30-day treatment with 1,3- butanediol has beneficial clinical effects as compared with placebo. Clinical benefit is defined as a hierarchical composite of death, heart failure (HF) events, change from baseline in the 6-minute walk test (6MWT), and change from baseline in NT-proBNP at 30 days, as assessed using win ratio statistics.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

250

Phase

  • Phase 2

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

  • Name: Kristoffer Berg-Hansen, MD, PhD
  • Phone Number: +4560540700
  • Email: krisbe@rm.dk

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

      • Aalborg, Denmark
        • Not yet recruiting
        • Department of Cardiology, Aalborg University Hospital
        • Contact:
          • Søren Vraa, MD, PhD
          • Phone Number: +4560540700
          • Email: sov@rn.dk
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Søren Vraa, MD, PhD
      • Aarhus N, Denmark, 8200
        • Recruiting
        • Department of Cardiology, Aarhus University Hospital
        • Contact:
          • Kristoffer Berg-Hansen, MD, PhD
          • Phone Number: +4560540700
          • Email: krisbe@rm.dk
        • Contact:
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Andreas Bugge Tinggaard, MD, PhD
      • Copenhagen, Denmark
        • Not yet recruiting
        • Department of Cardiology, Rigshospitalet
        • Contact:
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Jacob Eifer Møller, MD, PhD, DMSc
      • Copenhagen, Denmark
        • Recruiting
        • Department of Cardiology, Herlev-Gentofte Hospital
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Morten Schou, MD, PhD
        • Contact:
      • Herning, Denmark, 7400
        • Recruiting
        • Department of Cardiology, Gødstrup Hospital, Herning, Denmark
        • Contact:
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Morten Böttcher, MD, PhD
      • Hvidovre, Denmark
        • Recruiting
        • Department of Cardiology, Copenhagen University Hospital - Amager and Hvidovre Hospital
        • Contact:
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Jens Dahlgaard Hove, MD, PhD
      • Odense, Denmark, 5000
        • Not yet recruiting
        • Department of Cardiology, Odense University Hospital
        • Contact:
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Mikael Kjær Poulsen, MD, PhD
      • Viborg, Denmark, 8800
        • Recruiting
        • Department of Cardiology, Viborg Hospital
        • Contact:
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Malene Hollingdal, MD, PhD

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

The study will enroll adult patients (≥18 years) admitted with AHF as the primary diagnosis, meeting all the following criteria:

  1. Documented new or worsening symptoms due to heart failure with at least one of the following: persistent dyspnea at rest or with minimal exertion, or fatigue.
  2. Objective evidence of worsening heart failure, consisting of at least two physical examination findings consistent with fluid retention and/or end-organ hypoperfusion or one physical examination finding and at least one laboratory criterion:

    a) Physical examination findings considered to be due to heart failure, including new or worsened: i. Peripheral edema ii. Increasing abdominal distention or ascites (in the absence of primary hepatic disease) iii. Pulmonary rales/crackles/crepitations iv. Increased jugular venous pressure and/or hepatojugular reflux v. S3 gallop vi. Clinically significant or rapid weight gain thought to be related to fluid retention b) Laboratory evidence of worsening HF, if obtained within 24 hours of presentation, including: i. Increased B-type natriuretic peptide (BNP) / N-terminal pro-BNP (NT-proBNP) concentrations consistent with decompensation of heart failure. In patients with chronically elevated natriuretic peptides, an increase of >30% above baseline should be noted.

    ii. Radiological evidence of pulmonary congestion iii. Echocardiographic criteria include: Dilated inferior vena cava with minimal collapse on inspiration; decreased left ventricular outflow tract (LVOT) minute stroke distance (velocity time integral [VTI]); septal or lateral E/e' >15 or >12, respectively; D-dominant pulmonary venous inflow pattern.

    iv. Invasive diagnostic evidence with right heart catheterization showing a pulmonary capillary wedge pressure ≥18 mmHg, central venous pressure ≥12 mmHg, or a cardiac index <2.2 L/min/m2

  3. Treatment with at least 40 mg of intravenous furosemide or its equivalent and/or intravenous vasoactive drugs and/or inotropic drugs.
  4. An LVEF of ≤35% is required, measured during the present hospitalization.
  5. Participants must present with elevated levels of natriuretic peptides, specifically NT-proBNP ≥600 pg/mL or BNP ≥150 pg/mL. For those in atrial fibrillation at the time of inclusion, NT-proBNP levels must be ≥900 pg/mL or BNP ≥225 pg/mL.

The enrollment window extends to the first five days of the hospital stay.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Current hospitalization for AHF triggered by significant arrhythmia (atrial fibrillation/flutter with sustained ventricular response >110 beats per minute, clinically significant bradycardia, or sustained ventricular tachycardia)
  2. Cardiogenic shock in INTERMACS level 1 or 2 (i.e. unstable hemodynamics despite inotropic/vasopressor therapy)
  3. Likelihood or current use of mechanical circulatory support
  4. Recent cardiac surgery within 3 days
  5. Ongoing severe infection or sepsis, severe anemia, acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, pulmonary embolism, or cerebrovascular accident
  6. Significant primary valvular disease (hemodynamically severe uncorrected primary cardiac valvular disease)
  7. Planned implantation of a cardiac resynchronization therapy device
  8. eGFR <15 mL/min/1.73 m2 during current hospitalization (unless ongoing continuous renal replacement therapy) or recurring dialysis
  9. Known obstructive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy, congenital heart disease, acute mechanical cause of acute heart failure (e.g., papillary muscular rupture), acute myocarditis, or constrictive pericarditis according to the treating physician
  10. Type 1 diabetes
  11. Advanced liver disease (Child-Pugh class C)
  12. Dementia or other cognitive disorder making the patient unable to give informed consent
  13. Pregnancy or breastfeeding
  14. Inability to intake oral substances or severe dysphagia
  15. Significant gastrointestinal disease (i.e. severe inflammatory bowel disease or gastric ulcer)
  16. Adherent to a ketogenic diet within 30 days of enrollment
  17. Awaiting cardiac transplantation
  18. Very severe lung disease and/or treatment with continuous home oxygen therapy
  19. Major comorbidity, medical condition, or health issue that, according to the investigator's judgment, would hinder the participant's capacity to engage in or successfully finish the study

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Quadruple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: 1,3-butanediol
1,3-butanediol (Ketone-IQ®) 118 mL (33 g) servings trice daily
1,3-butanediol (Ketone-IQ®) 118 mL (33 g) servings trice daily
Placebo Comparator: Placebo
Taste-matched placebo (isovolumic, isoviscous water with stevia) 118 mL servings trice daily
Taste-matched placebo (isovolumic, isoviscous water with stevia) 118 mL servings trice daily

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in clinical benefit during 1,3-butanediol treatment versus placebo
Time Frame: From baseline (day 0) to end of treatment (day 30)

Clinical benefit is defined through a hierarchical composite endpoint, using a win ratio, from day 0 to 30 in all-cause death and time to death, number of and time to heart failure events, ≥30 meters increase in the change from baseline to follow-up at 30 days in the 6MWT, (iv) >30% decrease in the change from baseline to follow-up at 30 days in NT-proBNP, and (v) % decrease in NT-proBNP (continuous variable).

The primary endpoint will be evaluated using a win ratio, in an intention-to-treat approach, with participants analyzed within the treatment groups to which they were originally randomized. The win ratio method involves a pairwise hierarchical comparison of each participant against all others and is determined by dividing the total number of wins achieved by participants in the 1,3-butanediol group by the total number of losses.

From baseline (day 0) to end of treatment (day 30)

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Time to all-cause death
Time Frame: From baseline (day 0) to end of treatment (day 30)
From baseline (day 0) to end of treatment (day 30)
Time to first heart failure event
Time Frame: From baseline (day 0) to end of treatment (day 30)
From baseline (day 0) to end of treatment (day 30)
Change in six-minute walking distance
Time Frame: From baseline (day 0) to end of treatment (day 30)
From baseline (day 0) to end of treatment (day 30)
Change in NT-proBNP
Time Frame: From baseline (day 0) to discharge and end of treatment (day 30)
From baseline (day 0) to discharge and end of treatment (day 30)
Change in KCCQ-12 total summary score
Time Frame: From baseline (day 0) to discharge and end of treatment (day 30)
From baseline (day 0) to discharge and end of treatment (day 30)
Change in VAS dyspnea score
Time Frame: From baseline (day 0) to discharge and end of treatment (day 30)
From baseline (day 0) to discharge and end of treatment (day 30)
Change in physical exertion score during six- minute walk test
Time Frame: From baseline (day 0) to discharge and end of treatment (day 30)
From baseline (day 0) to discharge and end of treatment (day 30)
Change in systolic blood pressure
Time Frame: From baseline (day 0) to discharge and end of treatment (day 30)
From baseline (day 0) to discharge and end of treatment (day 30)
Change in body weight
Time Frame: From baseline (day 0) to discharge and end of treatment (day 30)
From baseline (day 0) to discharge and end of treatment (day 30)
Diuretic response
Time Frame: From baseline (day 0) to discharge and end of treatment (day 30)
Diuretic response will be defined as Δ weight kg/[(total intravenous dose)/40mg] + [(total oral dose)/80mg)] furosemide or equivalent loop diuretic dose
From baseline (day 0) to discharge and end of treatment (day 30)
Cumulative dose of loop diuretic medication
Time Frame: From baseline (day 0) to discharge and end of treatment (day 30)
From baseline (day 0) to discharge and end of treatment (day 30)
Need for inotropes
Time Frame: From baseline (day 0) to end of treatment (day 30)
From baseline (day 0) to end of treatment (day 30)
Transfer to the intensive care unit
Time Frame: From baseline (day 0) to end of treatment (day 30)
From baseline (day 0) to end of treatment (day 30)
Need for dialysis
Time Frame: From baseline (day 0) to end of treatment (day 30)
From baseline (day 0) to end of treatment (day 30)
Change in daily activity level
Time Frame: From discharge, day 30, and end of treatment (day 30)
When discharged, a wearable triaxial accelerometer will be placed around the wrist of the patient. The accelerometer will measure daily physical activity (milligravitational units) between discharge and 30-day follow-up.
From discharge, day 30, and end of treatment (day 30)

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Length of index hospital stay
Time Frame: From baseline (day 0) to end of treatment (day 30)
From baseline (day 0) to end of treatment (day 30)
Days alive out of hospital
Time Frame: From baseline (day 0) to end of treatment (day 30)
From baseline (day 0) to end of treatment (day 30)
Subject experiencing improvement/deterioration in NYHA Class
Time Frame: From baseline (day 0) to discharge, day 30, and end of treatment (day 30)
From baseline (day 0) to discharge, day 30, and end of treatment (day 30)
Change in estimated glomerular filtration rate
Time Frame: From baseline (day 0) to discharge and end of treatment (day 30)
Pre-Specified Renal sub study
From baseline (day 0) to discharge and end of treatment (day 30)
Change in hematocrit
Time Frame: From baseline (day 0) to discharge and end of treatment (day 30)
Pre-Specified Renal sub study
From baseline (day 0) to discharge and end of treatment (day 30)
Change in urine sodium
Time Frame: From baseline (day 0) to discharge and end of treatment (day 30)
Pre-Specified Renal sub study
From baseline (day 0) to discharge and end of treatment (day 30)
Change in urine 3-OHB
Time Frame: From baseline (day 0) to discharge and end of treatment (day 30)
Pre-Specified Renal sub study
From baseline (day 0) to discharge and end of treatment (day 30)
Change in insulin sensitivity
Time Frame: From baseline (day 0) to discharge and end of treatment (day 30)
Pre-Specified Metabolic sub study
From baseline (day 0) to discharge and end of treatment (day 30)
Change in cholesterol level
Time Frame: From baseline (day 0) and end of treatment (day 30)
Pre-Specified Metabolic sub study
From baseline (day 0) and end of treatment (day 30)
Change in left atrial volume
Time Frame: From baseline (day 0) and end of treatment (day 30)
Pre-Specified Hemodynamic sub study
From baseline (day 0) and end of treatment (day 30)
Change in LV filling pressure (E/e ́)
Time Frame: From baseline (day 0) and end of treatment (day 30)
Pre-Specified Hemodynamic sub study
From baseline (day 0) and end of treatment (day 30)
Change in LVEF
Time Frame: From baseline (day 0) and end of treatment (day 30)
Pre-Specified Hemodynamic sub study
From baseline (day 0) and end of treatment (day 30)
Change in LV end-systolic volume
Time Frame: From baseline (day 0) and end of treatment (day 30)
Pre-Specified Hemodynamic sub study
From baseline (day 0) and end of treatment (day 30)
Change in LV end-diastolic volume
Time Frame: From baseline (day 0) and end of treatment (day 30)
Pre-Specified Hemodynamic sub study
From baseline (day 0) and end of treatment (day 30)

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

March 20, 2025

Primary Completion (Estimated)

November 1, 2027

Study Completion (Estimated)

January 1, 2028

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

October 21, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 21, 2024

First Posted (Actual)

October 22, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimated)

June 5, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 4, 2025

Last Verified

September 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • KETO-AHF
  • 1-10-72-63-24 (Registry Identifier: De videnskabsetiske Komitéer for Region Midtjylland)

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Acute Heart Failure (AHF)

Clinical Trials on 1,3-butanediol

Subscribe