Effects of an Exercise Program in Women Over 60 yr. With HFpEF and Sarcopenia on Functional Capacity and Quality of Life (TRAIN-SARC)

Effects of a Concurrent Training-based Exercise Program in Women Over 60 Years With Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction and Sarcopenia on Functional Capacity, Quality of Life and Cognitive Function

This prospective study will randomize (1:1) women with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) and sarcopenia to receive standard management alone or a combined 12-week supervised exercise program (combining aerobic and strength exercise) carried out in a single centre.

After randomization, patients will be clinically evaluated. The primary endpoint (peakVO2) will be assessed by cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET) at 12 weeks. Women over 60 with HFpEF, functional class NYHA class II-III, and sarcopenia criteria will be enrolled. A sample size estimation [alfa: 0.05, power: 80%, a 20% loss rate, and at least a delta change of mean peakVO2: +1.9 mL/kg/min (SD±2)] of 40 patients (20 per arm) would be necessary to test our hypothesis.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) is a highly prevalent clinical entity that predominantly affects women, whose incidence has increased in the last decade and has a complex and multifactorial pathophysiology. Sarcopenia, a prevalent concurrent condition, appears to be associated with reduced muscle strength and reduced maximal functional capacity.

Supervised training programs in patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction and sarcopenia have improved functional capacity. However, the researchers do not have evidence about the effects of a supervised training program on patients with HFpEF and sarcopenia, mainly when affecting women older than 60. This work aims to evaluate the effect of a 12-week supervised exercise program in patients with HFpEF and sarcopenia on maximal functional capacity evaluated by peak oxygen consumption (peakVO2).

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

40

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

      • Valencia, Spain, 46010
        • Hospital Clinico Universitario de Valencia

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients diagnosed with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction according to 2021 ESC guidelines for Heart Failure, with N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) >125 pg/mL, inthe last month.
  • Stable symptomatic heart failure patients (New York Heart Association functional class II-III) during the last month.
  • Age ≥ 60 years old.
  • The participant is willing to give informed consent to participate in the study.
  • SARC-F score ≥4 points.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Inability to perform a valid baseline cardiopulmonary exercise test.
  • Cardiac pacemaker.
  • Significant primary moderate-to-severe valve disease.
  • Effort angina or signs of ischemia during CPET.
  • Primary cardiomyopathies.
  • Cardiac transplantation.
  • Any other comorbidity with a life expectancy of less than one year.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Supervised aerobic plus moderate to high-intensity strenght training
Patients allocated to this arm will receive the usual care plus supervised aerobic and moderate to high-intensity strength training.
Patients allocated to this arm will receive the usual care plus supervised aerobic and moderate to high-intensity strength training twice weekly.
Sham Comparator: Usual care
Patients allocated to this arm will receive the standard medical treatment plus explicit recommendations for 12-week home-based moderate-intensity aerobic and strength training.
Patients allocated to this arm will receive standard medical treatment plus explicit recommendations for 12-week home-based moderate-intensity aerobic and strength training. They will also receive a weekly phone call and an in-person monthly visit to monitor exercise training performance.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Peak oxygen consumption
Time Frame: Primary outcome: Peak oxygen consumption will be evaluated at first visit and after 12 weeks. We will evaluate peak oxygen consumption change from baseline.
Maximal functional capacity will be evaluated using incremental and symptom-limited cardiopulmonary exercise testing on a bicycle ergometer, beginning with a workload of 10 W and increasing gradually in a ramp protocol at 10-W increments every 1 minute. We define maximal functional capacity as when the patient stops pedalling because of symptoms and the respiratory exchange ratio (RER) was 1. During exercise, patients will be monitored with 12-lead electrocardiogram and blood pressure measurements every 2 minutes. Gas exchange data and cardiopulmonary variables were averages of values taken every 10 seconds. Peak oxygen consumption (PeakVO2) was defined as the highest value of VO2 during the last 20 seconds of exercise.
Primary outcome: Peak oxygen consumption will be evaluated at first visit and after 12 weeks. We will evaluate peak oxygen consumption change from baseline.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Sarcopenia
Time Frame: Sarcopenia: SARC Questionnaire will be evaluated at first visit, after 12 weeks and after 16 weeks. We will evaluate the Sarc-F Questionnaire change from baseline.
SARC-F (strength, assistance in walking, rise from a chair, climb stairs, and falls) it is a self-administered questionnaire that has five components: strength, assistance with walking, getting up from a chair, climbing stairs, and falls. It has a 3-level scoring system based on the level of difficulty, ranging from 0 (none) to 2 (very much), for each component.
Sarcopenia: SARC Questionnaire will be evaluated at first visit, after 12 weeks and after 16 weeks. We will evaluate the Sarc-F Questionnaire change from baseline.
Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire Scales
Time Frame: The Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire will be evaluated at first visit, after 12 weeks and after 16 weeks. We will evaluate the Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire change from baseline.
The Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire includes 23 items that map to 7 domains: symptom frequency, symptom burden, symptom stability, physical limitations, social limitations, quality of life, and self-efficacy (the patient understanding of how to manage their heart failure). All Kansas City cardiomyopathy Questionnaire domains are scaled from 0 to 100, where scores represent health status as follows: 0 to 24, very poor to poor; 25 to 49, poor to fair; 50 to 74, fair to good; and 75 to 100, good to excellent. A change of 5 points is considered to be a small but clinically important change, whereas changes of 10 and 20 points are considered moderate-to-large and large-to-very-large clinical changes.
The Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire will be evaluated at first visit, after 12 weeks and after 16 weeks. We will evaluate the Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire change from baseline.

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Laura López Bueno, PhD, INCLIVA

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Estimated)

November 4, 2024

Primary Completion (Estimated)

October 30, 2025

Study Completion (Estimated)

January 30, 2026

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

October 22, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 22, 2024

First Posted (Actual)

October 23, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

October 26, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 23, 2024

Last Verified

October 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Sarcopenia

Clinical Trials on Usual Care

Subscribe