- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT06662656
ED50 of Sufentanil for Intraoperative Analgesia (ED50)
October 27, 2024 updated by: China International Neuroscience Institution
ED50 of Sufentanil with Dexmedetomidine Analgesia During Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy
- Sufentanil as an strong analgesic is used widespreadly during laparoscopic cholecystectomy.
- Lower dosages of sufentanil facilitated with dexmedetomidine can offer enough analgesia effect.
- The investigator are planning use the most classical method for determining the ED50 or half effective concentration of sufentanil facilitated with dexmedetomidine using sequential method, which is also called" up and down method" and" ladder method".
Study Overview
Status
Not yet recruiting
Conditions
Detailed Description
The concordance of the current research is that lower dosages of sufentanil facilitated with dexmedetomidine can offer enough analgesia effect through operation.
However, the dosages of sufentanil used in various researches vary greatly of operations.
Previous studies have shown that the amount of sufentanil required for intraoperative analgesia is smaller than that required while dexmedetomindine facilitated.
Although the appropriate dosage of sufentanil required for operation can ensure the analgesic effect of operation, excessive dosage can cause severe choking during intubation, postoperative nausea and vomiting, hyperalgesia, and chronic postoperative pain.
The investigator planning use the most classical method for determining the ED50 or half effective concentration of sufentainl combined with dexmedetomidine using sequential method, which is also called " up and down method" and " ladder method".
Study Type
Observational
Enrollment (Estimated)
26
Contacts and Locations
This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.
Study Locations
-
-
Beijing
-
Beijing, Beijing, China, 100053
- Xuanwu Hospital
-
Contact:
- Yanghai Cui, PHD
- Phone Number: 15010283592 83199270
- Email: 1055885750@qq.com
-
Contact:
- Tianlong Wang, Doctor
- Phone Number: 15910851623 15910851623
- Email: w_tl5595@yeah.net
-
-
Participation Criteria
Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Adult
- Older Adult
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Sampling Method
Probability Sample
Study Population
Patients in Xuanwu Hospital for elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy are selected.
Before surgery, visitors recorded basic information such as the patient's sex, age, BMI, ASA grade in the ward.
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- ASA I ~ II level;
- BMI22-30kg/m2;
- Those who intend to undergo laparoscopic cholecystectomy;
- Age 18~65 years.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Has been allergic to the drugs used in this study;
- Patients with a history of chronic use of alcohol, smoke or other sedative drugs;
- Patients took opioids and other analgesics before surgery;
- Emergency operation;
- Stress, anxiety resulting in secretion of catecholamine;
- Patients with neuropsychiatric disorders, coma, depression, cognitive impairment and Alzheimer's disease;
- Patients with epilepsy, autonomic nervous dysfunction and other diseases with abnormal EEG results;
- SBP< 85 mmHg or HR< 45次/min;
- Has implanted pacemaker;
- Patients were unwilling or disable to finish whole study;
- Patients with acute upper respiratory infections, liver or kidney failure and severe cardiopulmonary dysfunction.
Study Plan
This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.
How is the study designed?
Design Details
Cohorts and Interventions
Group / Cohort |
|---|
|
1μg/ kg group
Administration method of sufentanil: the dose of the first patient is 1μg / kg, and the ratio between adjacent doses is 1.2.
( IOC2 values of < 60, which were the target of this study, indicate adequate analgesic efect and analgesic level for regional surgery.
IOC2 values of ≥ 60 indicate inadequate use of analgesics.
If the analgesic effect of this patient is satisfactory, the next patient will use the lower dose.
If the analgesic efect of this patient is not satisfactory, the next patient will use a higher dose.
Starting from the first case of dissatisfaction, the number of observation units is counted.
Dissatisfaction - satisfaction occurs at 7 exchange points and then the test ends.)
|
|
0.83μg/ kg group
Administration method of sufentanil: the dose of the first patient is 1μg / kg, and the ratio between adjacent doses is 1.2.
1/1.2=0.833 ( IOC2 values of < 60, which were the target of this study, indicate adequate analgesic efect and analgesic level for regional surgery.
IOC2 values of ≥ 60 indicate inadequate use of analgesics.
If the analgesic effect of this patient is satisfactory, the next patient will use the lower dose.
If the analgesic efect of this patient is not satisfactory, the next patient will use a higher dose.
Starting from the first case of dissatisfaction, the number of observation units is counted.
Dissatisfaction - satisfaction occurs at 7 exchange points and then the test ends.)
|
|
0.69μg/ kg group
Administration method of sufentanil: the dose of the first patient is 1μg / kg, and the ratio between adjacent doses is 1.2.
0.833/1.2=0.694(
IOC2 values of < 60, which were the target of this study, indicate adequate analgesic efect and analgesic level for regional surgery.
IOC2 values of ≥ 60 indicate inadequate use of analgesics.
If the analgesic effect of this patient is satisfactory, the next patient will use the lower dose.
If the analgesic efect of this patient is not satisfactory, the next patient will use a higher dose.
Starting from the first case of dissatisfaction, the number of observation units is counted.
Dissatisfaction - satisfaction occurs at 7 exchange points and then the test ends.)
|
|
0.58μg/ kg group
Administration method of sufentanil: the dose of the first patient is 1μg / kg, and the ratio between adjacent doses is 1.2.
0.694/1.2=0.578(
IOC2 values of < 60, which were the target of this study, indicate adequate analgesic efect and analgesic level for regional surgery.
IOC2 values of ≥ 60 indicate inadequate use of analgesics.
If the analgesic effect of this patient is satisfactory, the next patient will use the lower dose.
If the analgesic efect of this patient is not satisfactory, the next patient will use a higher dose.
Starting from the first case of dissatisfaction, the number of observation units is counted.
Dissatisfaction - satisfaction occurs at 7 exchange points and then the test ends.)
|
|
0.48μg/ kg group
Administration method of sufentanil: the dose of the first patient is 1μg / kg, and the ratio between adjacent doses is 1.2.
0.578/1.2=0.482(
IOC2 values of < 60, which were the target of this study, indicate adequate analgesic efect and analgesic level for regional surgery.
IOC2 values of ≥ 60 indicate inadequate use of analgesics.
If the analgesic effect of this patient is satisfactory, the next patient will use the lower dose.
If the analgesic efect of this patient is not satisfactory, the next patient will use a higher dose.
Starting from the first case of dissatisfaction, the number of observation units is counted.
Dissatisfaction - satisfaction occurs at 7 exchange points and then the test ends.)
|
|
0.4μg/ kg group
Administration method of sufentanil: the dose of the first patient is 1μg / kg, and the ratio between adjacent doses is 1.2.
0.482/1.2=0.402(
IOC2 values of < 60, which were the target of this study, indicate adequate analgesic efect and analgesic level for regional surgery.
IOC2 values of ≥ 60 indicate inadequate use of analgesics.
If the analgesic effect of this patient is satisfactory, the next patient will use the lower dose.
If the analgesic efect of this patient is not satisfactory, the next patient will use a higher dose.
Starting from the first case of dissatisfaction, the number of observation units is counted.
Dissatisfaction - satisfaction occurs at 7 exchange points and then the test ends.)
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
The rate of the IOC2 target a reachment
Time Frame: through study completion, an average of 1 day
|
The primary endpoint of the study was the attainment rate of the IOC2 target during operation
|
through study completion, an average of 1 day
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
visual analog scale score
Time Frame: 12 hours and 24hours after surgery
|
visual analog scale (VAS) score at 12 h and 24 hours after operation,
|
12 hours and 24hours after surgery
|
|
The ratio of vomiting
Time Frame: 0 day, 1 day, 2 day after operation
|
the ratio of vomiting
|
0 day, 1 day, 2 day after operation
|
|
Systolic Blood Pressure
Time Frame: 0 day
|
Systolic Blood Pressure reflect haemodynamics changeduring operation
|
0 day
|
|
Dystolic Blood Pressure
Time Frame: 0 day
|
Dystolic Blood Pressure during operation
|
0 day
|
|
Mean Blood Pressure
Time Frame: 0 day
|
Mean Blood Pressure during opeation
|
0 day
|
|
Heart rate
Time Frame: 0 day
|
Heart rate during operation
|
0 day
|
Collaborators and Investigators
This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.
Study record dates
These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Estimated)
November 1, 2024
Primary Completion (Estimated)
January 30, 2025
Study Completion (Estimated)
January 30, 2025
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
March 17, 2024
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
October 27, 2024
First Posted (Actual)
October 29, 2024
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
October 29, 2024
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
October 27, 2024
Last Verified
October 1, 2024
More Information
Terms related to this study
Other Study ID Numbers
- CINI-AD-202403-13 (Other Identifier: XuanWu Hospital)
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
No
product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.
No
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy
-
Wake Forest University Health SciencesAmerican College of SurgeonsCompletedCholecystectomy, Laparoscopic | Appendectomy, Laparoscopic | Cholecystectomy, RoboticUnited States
-
Clinical Research Centre, MalaysiaCompletedComplication Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy | Conversion Laparoscopic to Open CholecystectomyMalaysia
-
Intuitive SurgicalCompletedLaparoscopic Cholecystectomy | Robotic-assisted CholecystectomyUnited States
-
Assiut UniversityNot yet recruiting
-
IHU StrasbourgScialytics SASRecruitingCholecystectomy, LaparoscopicFrance
-
Assiut UniversityNot yet recruiting
-
Mohamed Bakr Mohamed AhmedNot yet recruitingLaparoscopic Cholecystectomy
-
Istanbul University - CerrahpasaActive, not recruitingCholecystectomy, LaparoscopicTurkey (Türkiye)
-
Ulas AdayCompletedLaparoscopic CholecystectomyTurkey (Türkiye)
-
Mansoura UniversityCompletedLaparoscopic CholecystectomyEgypt