Insufficient Regional Anesthesia and Conversion to General Anesthesia for Cesarean Section A Qualitative Multicenter Study

August 20, 2025 updated by: Helene Korvenius Nedergaard, Sygehus Lillebaelt

Background In Denmark, approximately 20% of all children are born via cesarean section (C-section), making it the most common surgical procedure (also internationally). The recommended anesthesia for cesarean sections is regional anesthesia (spinal or epidural, "spinal anesthesia"), as it has several advantages: the woman is awake and experiences the delivery of her child, she maintains spontaneous breathing (the risk of difficult airway management is significantly higher in pregnant women), and the risk of aspiration of stomach contents into the lungs (which is clearly increased in pregnant women) is reduced. Furthermore, regional anesthesia can contribute to early postoperative pain management to some extent.

With spinal anesthesia, most women feel pressure and touch but no pain during the cesarean section. However, some women do experience pain during the procedure, necessitating a change in the plan. If inadequate anesthesia is detected before the surgery begins, one may choose (depending on, for example, the urgency of the cesarean) to administer renewed regional anesthesia (typically an epidural). However, if the woman first experiences pain after the surgery has commenced, it is necessary to place her under general anesthesia for the remainder of the procedure. Experience shows that this process can be challenging, and there are frequent examples in clinical practice of inappropriate courses of action, where women have experienced unacceptable pain during their cesarean sections without being placed under general anesthesia. It is difficult to obtain an exact figure on how many women experience inadequate anesthesia during cesarean sections under regional anesthesia, as not all cases are recognized or followed up on. Studies indicate that up to 12% experience pain during a cesarean section.

The consequences of inadequate anesthesia for cesarean sections can be quite significant for women, including impaired bonding with the child, poorer establishment of breastfeeding, increased risk of postpartum reactions and post-traumatic stress, as well as (anecdotally) the risk of women opting out of future pregnancies, as they may be reluctant to subject themselves to a similar situation again.

Aim The aim of this study is to investigate how women experience insufficient regional anesthesia during cesarean sections that require conversion to general anesthesia. The focus is on exploring the factors that contribute positively and negatively to the woman's experience in this situation.

Method Qualitative study in six Danish hospitals.

Inclusion criteria:

  • Women undergoing elective or emergency cesarean section, aged over 17 years
  • Regional (spinal or epidural or combined epidural-spinal) anesthesia converted to general anesthesia intraoperatively (i.e., after surgery has commenced) due to insufficient regional anesthesia (i.e., not for obstetric indications, such as in cases of difficult fetal extraction)

Exclusion criteria:

  • Does not speak Danish or English
  • Does not wish to participate

The woman will be contacted for the first time on day 1 or 2 after the cesarean section (before she is discharged from the hospital). She will be informed about the project and invited to participate. As a potential project participant, she is entitled to a 24-hour consideration period, and if desired, a new contact will be arranged for the following day. If she wishes to participate, she will be contacted again after 3 months. At this time, she will receive a call to schedule a follow-up telephone interview within a few days. This will take place as a semi-structured interview, initiated with open questions and concluded with a few more specific questions. At the end of the interview, a screening for post-traumatic stress will be conducted using the PTSD-8 tool. Follow-up interviews will be recorded digitally and transcribed verbatim.

Sample Size The project encompasses all women at the participating centers who experience insufficient regional anesthesia during a cesarean section and conversion to general anesthesia during 1 year.

Study Overview

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Estimated)

30

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

      • Aalborg, Denmark, 9000
        • Recruiting
        • Aalborg Hospital
        • Contact:
      • Copenhagen, Denmark
        • Recruiting
        • Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital
        • Contact:
      • Herlev, Denmark
      • Hillerød, Denmark, 3400
      • Kolding, Denmark, 6000
      • Roskilde, Denmark, 4000
        • Recruiting
        • Roskilde Hospital
        • Contact:
    • Region Midt
      • Viborg, Region Midt, Denmark

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

The project encompasses all women at the participating centers who experience insufficient regional anesthesia during a cesarean section and conversion to general anesthesia. Based on experience, this occurs relatively infrequently, but is estimated to happen 5-10 times a year at each participating center. It is anticipated that some women may decline to participate in the project, and since cesarean sections occur at all times of the day and year, the project group may risk not identifying some cases. The number of women required to participate before a sufficient amount of information is obtained (as no new information is expected from subsequent interviews) is not known in advance; however, it is estimated that 20-30 women will need to participate. Therefore, the inclusion period is expected to last for one year.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Women undergoing elective or emergency cesarean section, aged over 17 years
  • Regional (spinal or epidural or combined epidural-spinal) anesthesia converted to general anesthesia intraoperatively (i.e., after surgery has commenced) due to insufficient regional anesthesia (i.e., not for obstetric indications, such as in cases of difficult fetal extraction)

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Does not speak Danish or English
  • Does not wish to participate

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Partuients experiencing conversion of regional to general anesthesia for cesarean section
All parturients undergoing emergency or elective cesarean section in a participating hospital, who experience insufficient regional anesthesia and conversion to general anesthesia during the 1 year inclusion period

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Parturients experience of insufficient regional anesthesia and conversion to general anesthesia
Time Frame: Three months after the cesarean section

Parturients experience of insufficient regional anesthesia during cesarean sections that require conversion to general anesthesia.

Investigated through semi-structured telephone interviews.

The focus is on exploring the factors that contribute positively and negatively to the woman's experience of this situation.

Three months after the cesarean section

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Posttraumatic stress
Time Frame: Three months after the cesarean section
Parturients will be screened for symptoms of posttraumatic stress, using the PTSD-8 screening tool, at the end of the follow-up telephone-interview.
Three months after the cesarean section

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

February 1, 2025

Primary Completion (Estimated)

February 1, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

January 1, 2027

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

October 31, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 31, 2024

First Posted (Actual)

November 1, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimated)

August 27, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 20, 2025

Last Verified

August 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 24/67884

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Cesarean Section Complications

Subscribe