Effectiveness of Early Intervention in Transfusion Independent Aplastic Anemia: a Retrospective Medical Claims Database Study

October 30, 2024 updated by: Novartis Pharmaceuticals
This was a retrospective non-interventional cohort study with secondary use of data from the Medical Data Vision (MDV) hospital-based database to evaluate the effectiveness of early drug intervention in preventing transfusion compared to watchful observation among adult transfusion-independent aplastic anemia (AA) patients in Japan.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

1603

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Tokyo, Japan, 105-6333
        • Novartis

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child
  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

This was a retrospective, noninterventional cohort study.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Having at least one confirmed diagnosis of AA within the selection period (1 inpatient or 2 outpatient claims per the International Statistical Classification of Diseases, 10th Revision [ICD-10] code, without any suspicion flag).
  • Being aged 15 to 90 years at the index date.
  • Having at least 3 months of continuous enrolment prior to the index date.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Having a blood transfusion recorded any time before the index date.
  • Having anti-thymocyte globulin (ATG) treatment recorded within 3 months after the index date.
  • Having at least one prescription record for any of the drug treatments of interest any time before the index date.
  • Having a diagnosis of acute myeloid leukemia (AML), chronic myelomonocytic leukemia (CMML) or other leukemia any time before the index date.
  • Having an AA diagnosis (without suspicious flag) date earlier than the start of patient's observation in the database.
  • Having less than 6 months of continuous follow-up.

Safety Population - Additional Exclusion Criterion:

- Having a diagnosis of hepatotoxicity, kidney dysfunction, hypertension, or diabetes mellitus any time before the index date.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Early drug intervention group
Patients who had at least one prescription record associated with any of the drug treatments of interest (cyclosporine A, eltrombopag, romiplostin, danazol, or methenolone) during each period of interest before the first transfusion record during the follow-up period.
Watchful observation group
Patients with no prescription record associated with any of the drug treatments of interest (cyclosporine A, eltrombopag, romiplostin, danazol, or methenolone) during the follow-up period and before the first transfusion record, if any.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Probability of Having Blood Transfusion in the Matched Effectiveness Population
Time Frame: Baseline, at 6 and 9 months, and at 1, 2, 5, and 10 years
The Kaplan-Meier survival analysis technique was used to estimate probability.
Baseline, at 6 and 9 months, and at 1, 2, 5, and 10 years
Crude Hazard Ratios of Having Blood Transfusion After 6 Months of Follow-up in the Matched Effectiveness Population
Time Frame: Baseline, 6 months
Baseline, 6 months
Adjusted Hazard Ratios of Having Blood Transfusion After 6 Months of Follow-up in the Matched Effectiveness Population
Time Frame: 6 months
6 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Weight
Time Frame: Baseline
Baseline
Age
Time Frame: Baseline
Baseline
Sex
Time Frame: Baseline
Baseline
Hemoglobin Level
Time Frame: Baseline
Baseline
Body Mass Index (BMI)
Time Frame: Baseline
Baseline
Number of Patients With Aplastic Anemia, per Severity Level
Time Frame: Baseline
Baseline
Number of Patients With Immune Thrombocytopenia (ITP) Diagnosis Before Index Date
Time Frame: Baseline
Baseline
Number of Patients With Myelodysplastic Syndrome (MDS) Diagnosis Before Index Date
Time Frame: Baseline
Baseline
Number of Patients With Pre-index Comorbidities
Time Frame: Baseline
Baseline
Number of Patients With Pre-index Use of Chloramphenicol
Time Frame: Baseline
Baseline
Platelet Count
Time Frame: Baseline
Baseline
Neutrophil Count
Time Frame: Baseline
Baseline
Number of Patients Per Treatment Therapy in the Matched Effectiveness Population
Time Frame: Baseline
Baseline
Number of Patients With Aplastic Anemia in the Matched Effectiveness Population, per Severity Level
Time Frame: Baseline
Baseline
Number of Patients in the Matched Effectiveness Population Who Discontinued
Time Frame: Baseline, at 6 and 9 months, and at 1 and 2 years
Baseline, at 6 and 9 months, and at 1 and 2 years
Probability of Having Blood Transfusion in Early Drug Intervention and Watchful Observation Matched Patients From the Effectiveness Population
Time Frame: Baseline, at 6 and 9 months, and at 1, 2, 5, and 10 years
The Kaplan-Meier survival analysis technique was used to estimate probability.
Baseline, at 6 and 9 months, and at 1, 2, 5, and 10 years
Probability of Having Stem-Cell Transplantation (SCT) in Early Drug Intervention and Watchful Observation Matched Patients From the Effectiveness Population
Time Frame: Baseline, at 6 and 9 months, and at 1, 2, 5, and 10 years
The Kaplan-Meier survival analysis technique was used to estimate probability.
Baseline, at 6 and 9 months, and at 1, 2, 5, and 10 years
Probability of Having Anti-Thymocyte Globulin (ATG) in Early Drug Intervention and Watchful Observation Matched Patients From the Effectiveness Population
Time Frame: Baseline, at 6 and 9 months, and at 1, 2, 5, and 10 years
The Kaplan-Meier survival analysis technique was used to estimate probability.
Baseline, at 6 and 9 months, and at 1, 2, 5, and 10 years
Probability of Having Blood Transfusion at Different Timepoints by Drug Categories in the Matched Effectiveness Population
Time Frame: Baseline, at 6 and 9 months, and at 1, 2, 5, and 10 years
The Kaplan-Meier survival analysis technique was used to estimate probability.
Baseline, at 6 and 9 months, and at 1, 2, 5, and 10 years
Probability of Having SCT at Different Timepoints by Drug Categories in the Matched Effectiveness Population
Time Frame: Baseline, at 6 and 9 months, and at 1, 2, 5, and 10 years
The Kaplan-Meier survival analysis technique was used to estimate probability.
Baseline, at 6 and 9 months, and at 1, 2, 5, and 10 years
Probability of Having ATG at Different Timepoints by Drug Categories in the Matched Effectiveness Population
Time Frame: Baseline, at 6 and 9 months, and at 1, 2, 5, and 10 years
The Kaplan-Meier survival analysis technique was used to estimate probability.
Baseline, at 6 and 9 months, and at 1, 2, 5, and 10 years
Probability of Having a Bleeding Event in Early Drug Intervention and Watchful Observation Matched Patients From the Safety Population
Time Frame: Baseline, at 6 and 9 months, and at 1, 2, 5, and 10 years
The Kaplan-Meier survival analysis technique was used to estimate probability.
Baseline, at 6 and 9 months, and at 1, 2, 5, and 10 years
Probability of Having Cataract in Early Drug Intervention and Watchful Observation Matched Patients From the Safety Population
Time Frame: Baseline, at 6 and 9 months, and at 1, 2, 5, and 10 years
The Kaplan-Meier survival analysis technique was used to estimate probability.
Baseline, at 6 and 9 months, and at 1, 2, 5, and 10 years
Probability of Having Diabetes in Early Drug Intervention and Watchful Observation Matched Patients From the Safety Population
Time Frame: Baseline, at 6 and 9 months, and at 1, 2, 5, and 10 years
The Kaplan-Meier survival analysis technique was used to estimate probability.
Baseline, at 6 and 9 months, and at 1, 2, 5, and 10 years
Probability of Having Hepatotoxicity in Early Drug Intervention and Watchful Observation Matched Patients From the Safety Population
Time Frame: Baseline, at 6 and 9 months, and at 1, 2, 5, and 10 years
The Kaplan-Meier survival analysis technique was used to estimate probability.
Baseline, at 6 and 9 months, and at 1, 2, 5, and 10 years
Probability of Having Hypertension in Early Drug Intervention and Watchful Observation Matched Patients From the Safety Population
Time Frame: Baseline, at 6 and 9 months, and at 1, 2, 5, and 10 years
The Kaplan-Meier survival analysis technique was used to estimate probability.
Baseline, at 6 and 9 months, and at 1, 2, 5, and 10 years
Probability of Having an Infection in Early Drug Intervention and Watchful Observation Matched Patients From the Safety Population
Time Frame: Baseline, at 6 and 9 months, and at 1, 2, 5, and 10 years
The Kaplan-Meier survival analysis technique was used to estimate probability.
Baseline, at 6 and 9 months, and at 1, 2, 5, and 10 years
Probability of Having Kidney Dysfunction in Early Drug Intervention and Watchful Observation Matched Patients From the Safety Population
Time Frame: Baseline, at 6 and 9 months, and at 1, 2, 5, and 10 years
The Kaplan-Meier survival analysis technique was used to estimate probability.
Baseline, at 6 and 9 months, and at 1, 2, 5, and 10 years
Probability of Having Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML), Chronic Myelomonocytic Leukemia (CMML) or Another Leukemia in Early Drug Intervention and Watchful Observation Matched Patients From the Safety Population
Time Frame: Baseline, at 6 and 9 months, and at 1, 2, 5, and 10 years
The Kaplan-Meier survival analysis technique was used to estimate probability.
Baseline, at 6 and 9 months, and at 1, 2, 5, and 10 years
Probability of Having MDS in Early Drug Intervention and Watchful Observation Matched Patients From the Safety Population
Time Frame: Baseline, at 6 and 9 months, and at 1, 2, 5, and 10 years
The Kaplan-Meier survival analysis technique was used to estimate probability.
Baseline, at 6 and 9 months, and at 1, 2, 5, and 10 years
Probability of Having Paroxysmal Nocturnal Hemoglobinuria (PNH) in Early Drug Intervention and Watchful Observation Matched Patients From the Safety Population
Time Frame: Baseline, at 6 and 9 months, and at 1, 2, 5, and 10 years
The Kaplan-Meier survival analysis technique was used to estimate probability.
Baseline, at 6 and 9 months, and at 1, 2, 5, and 10 years
Probability of Having a Thromboembolic Event in Early Drug Intervention and Watchful Observation Matched Patients From the Safety Population
Time Frame: Baseline, at 6 and 9 months, and at 1, 2, 5, and 10 years
The Kaplan-Meier survival analysis technique was used to estimate probability.
Baseline, at 6 and 9 months, and at 1, 2, 5, and 10 years
Probability of Having Myelofibrosis in Early Drug Intervention and Watchful Observation Matched Patients From the Safety Population
Time Frame: Baseline, at 6 and 9 months, and at 1, 2, 5, and 10 years
The Kaplan-Meier survival analysis technique was used to estimate probability.
Baseline, at 6 and 9 months, and at 1, 2, 5, and 10 years
Probability of Having a Bleeding Event by Drug Categories in the Matched Safety Population
Time Frame: Baseline, at 6 and 9 months, and at 1, 2, 5, and 10 years
The Kaplan-Meier survival analysis technique was used to estimate probability.
Baseline, at 6 and 9 months, and at 1, 2, 5, and 10 years
Probability of Having Cataract by Drug Categories in the Matched Safety Population
Time Frame: Baseline, at 6 and 9 months, and at 1, 2, 5, and 10 years
The Kaplan-Meier survival analysis technique was used to estimate probability.
Baseline, at 6 and 9 months, and at 1, 2, 5, and 10 years
Probability of Having Diabetes by Drug Categories in the Matched Safety Population
Time Frame: Baseline, at 6 and 9 months, and at 1, 2, 5, and 10 years
The Kaplan-Meier survival analysis technique was used to estimate probability.
Baseline, at 6 and 9 months, and at 1, 2, 5, and 10 years
Probability of Having Hepatotoxicity by Drug Categories in the Matched Safety Population
Time Frame: Baseline, at 6 and 9 months, and at 1, 2, 5, and 10 years
The Kaplan-Meier survival analysis technique was used to estimate probability.
Baseline, at 6 and 9 months, and at 1, 2, 5, and 10 years
Probability of Having an Infection by Drug Categories in the Matched Safety Population
Time Frame: Baseline, at 6 and 9 months, and at 1, 2, 5, and 10 years
The Kaplan-Meier survival analysis technique was used to estimate probability.
Baseline, at 6 and 9 months, and at 1, 2, 5, and 10 years
Probability of Having Kidney Dysfunction by Drug Categories in the Matched Safety Population
Time Frame: Baseline, at 6 and 9 months, and at 1, 2, 5, and 10 years
The Kaplan-Meier survival analysis technique was used to estimate probability.
Baseline, at 6 and 9 months, and at 1, 2, 5, and 10 years
Probability of Having AML, CMML or Another Leukemia by Drug Categories in the Matched Safety Population
Time Frame: Baseline, at 6 and 9 months, and at 1, 2, 5, and 10 years
The Kaplan-Meier survival analysis technique was used to estimate probability.
Baseline, at 6 and 9 months, and at 1, 2, 5, and 10 years
Probability of Having MDS by Drug Categories in the Matched Safety Population
Time Frame: Baseline, at 6 and 9 months, and at 1, 2, 5, and 10 years
The Kaplan-Meier survival analysis technique was used to estimate probability.
Baseline, at 6 and 9 months, and at 1, 2, 5, and 10 years
Probability of Having PNH by Drug Categories in the Matched Safety Population
Time Frame: Baseline, at 6 and 9 months, and at 1, 2, 5, and 10 years
The Kaplan-Meier survival analysis technique was used to estimate probability.
Baseline, at 6 and 9 months, and at 1, 2, 5, and 10 years
Probability of Having a Thromboembolic Event by Drug Categories in the Matched Safety Population
Time Frame: Baseline, at 6 and 9 months, and at 1, 2, 5, and 10 years
The Kaplan-Meier survival analysis technique was used to estimate probability.
Baseline, at 6 and 9 months, and at 1, 2, 5, and 10 years
Probability of Having Myelofibrosis by Drug Categories in the Matched Safety Population
Time Frame: Baseline, at 6 and 9 months, and at 1, 2, 5, and 10 years
The Kaplan-Meier survival analysis technique was used to estimate probability.
Baseline, at 6 and 9 months, and at 1, 2, 5, and 10 years

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Director: Novartis Pharmaceuticals, Novartis Pharmaceuticals

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

May 5, 2022

Primary Completion (Actual)

November 3, 2023

Study Completion (Actual)

November 3, 2023

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

October 30, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 30, 2024

First Posted (Estimated)

November 1, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimated)

November 1, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 30, 2024

Last Verified

October 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • CETB115EJP05

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Aplastic Anemia (AA)

Subscribe