- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT06669221
Effectiveness of Early Intervention in Transfusion Independent Aplastic Anemia: a Retrospective Medical Claims Database Study
October 30, 2024 updated by: Novartis Pharmaceuticals
This was a retrospective non-interventional cohort study with secondary use of data from the Medical Data Vision (MDV) hospital-based database to evaluate the effectiveness of early drug intervention in preventing transfusion compared to watchful observation among adult transfusion-independent aplastic anemia (AA) patients in Japan.
Study Overview
Status
Completed
Conditions
Study Type
Observational
Enrollment (Actual)
1603
Contacts and Locations
This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.
Study Locations
-
-
-
Tokyo, Japan, 105-6333
- Novartis
-
-
Participation Criteria
Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Child
- Adult
- Older Adult
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Sampling Method
Non-Probability Sample
Study Population
This was a retrospective, noninterventional cohort study.
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Having at least one confirmed diagnosis of AA within the selection period (1 inpatient or 2 outpatient claims per the International Statistical Classification of Diseases, 10th Revision [ICD-10] code, without any suspicion flag).
- Being aged 15 to 90 years at the index date.
- Having at least 3 months of continuous enrolment prior to the index date.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Having a blood transfusion recorded any time before the index date.
- Having anti-thymocyte globulin (ATG) treatment recorded within 3 months after the index date.
- Having at least one prescription record for any of the drug treatments of interest any time before the index date.
- Having a diagnosis of acute myeloid leukemia (AML), chronic myelomonocytic leukemia (CMML) or other leukemia any time before the index date.
- Having an AA diagnosis (without suspicious flag) date earlier than the start of patient's observation in the database.
- Having less than 6 months of continuous follow-up.
Safety Population - Additional Exclusion Criterion:
- Having a diagnosis of hepatotoxicity, kidney dysfunction, hypertension, or diabetes mellitus any time before the index date.
Study Plan
This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.
How is the study designed?
Design Details
Cohorts and Interventions
Group / Cohort |
|---|
|
Early drug intervention group
Patients who had at least one prescription record associated with any of the drug treatments of interest (cyclosporine A, eltrombopag, romiplostin, danazol, or methenolone) during each period of interest before the first transfusion record during the follow-up period.
|
|
Watchful observation group
Patients with no prescription record associated with any of the drug treatments of interest (cyclosporine A, eltrombopag, romiplostin, danazol, or methenolone) during the follow-up period and before the first transfusion record, if any.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Probability of Having Blood Transfusion in the Matched Effectiveness Population
Time Frame: Baseline, at 6 and 9 months, and at 1, 2, 5, and 10 years
|
The Kaplan-Meier survival analysis technique was used to estimate probability.
|
Baseline, at 6 and 9 months, and at 1, 2, 5, and 10 years
|
|
Crude Hazard Ratios of Having Blood Transfusion After 6 Months of Follow-up in the Matched Effectiveness Population
Time Frame: Baseline, 6 months
|
Baseline, 6 months
|
|
|
Adjusted Hazard Ratios of Having Blood Transfusion After 6 Months of Follow-up in the Matched Effectiveness Population
Time Frame: 6 months
|
6 months
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Weight
Time Frame: Baseline
|
Baseline
|
|
|
Age
Time Frame: Baseline
|
Baseline
|
|
|
Sex
Time Frame: Baseline
|
Baseline
|
|
|
Hemoglobin Level
Time Frame: Baseline
|
Baseline
|
|
|
Body Mass Index (BMI)
Time Frame: Baseline
|
Baseline
|
|
|
Number of Patients With Aplastic Anemia, per Severity Level
Time Frame: Baseline
|
Baseline
|
|
|
Number of Patients With Immune Thrombocytopenia (ITP) Diagnosis Before Index Date
Time Frame: Baseline
|
Baseline
|
|
|
Number of Patients With Myelodysplastic Syndrome (MDS) Diagnosis Before Index Date
Time Frame: Baseline
|
Baseline
|
|
|
Number of Patients With Pre-index Comorbidities
Time Frame: Baseline
|
Baseline
|
|
|
Number of Patients With Pre-index Use of Chloramphenicol
Time Frame: Baseline
|
Baseline
|
|
|
Platelet Count
Time Frame: Baseline
|
Baseline
|
|
|
Neutrophil Count
Time Frame: Baseline
|
Baseline
|
|
|
Number of Patients Per Treatment Therapy in the Matched Effectiveness Population
Time Frame: Baseline
|
Baseline
|
|
|
Number of Patients With Aplastic Anemia in the Matched Effectiveness Population, per Severity Level
Time Frame: Baseline
|
Baseline
|
|
|
Number of Patients in the Matched Effectiveness Population Who Discontinued
Time Frame: Baseline, at 6 and 9 months, and at 1 and 2 years
|
Baseline, at 6 and 9 months, and at 1 and 2 years
|
|
|
Probability of Having Blood Transfusion in Early Drug Intervention and Watchful Observation Matched Patients From the Effectiveness Population
Time Frame: Baseline, at 6 and 9 months, and at 1, 2, 5, and 10 years
|
The Kaplan-Meier survival analysis technique was used to estimate probability.
|
Baseline, at 6 and 9 months, and at 1, 2, 5, and 10 years
|
|
Probability of Having Stem-Cell Transplantation (SCT) in Early Drug Intervention and Watchful Observation Matched Patients From the Effectiveness Population
Time Frame: Baseline, at 6 and 9 months, and at 1, 2, 5, and 10 years
|
The Kaplan-Meier survival analysis technique was used to estimate probability.
|
Baseline, at 6 and 9 months, and at 1, 2, 5, and 10 years
|
|
Probability of Having Anti-Thymocyte Globulin (ATG) in Early Drug Intervention and Watchful Observation Matched Patients From the Effectiveness Population
Time Frame: Baseline, at 6 and 9 months, and at 1, 2, 5, and 10 years
|
The Kaplan-Meier survival analysis technique was used to estimate probability.
|
Baseline, at 6 and 9 months, and at 1, 2, 5, and 10 years
|
|
Probability of Having Blood Transfusion at Different Timepoints by Drug Categories in the Matched Effectiveness Population
Time Frame: Baseline, at 6 and 9 months, and at 1, 2, 5, and 10 years
|
The Kaplan-Meier survival analysis technique was used to estimate probability.
|
Baseline, at 6 and 9 months, and at 1, 2, 5, and 10 years
|
|
Probability of Having SCT at Different Timepoints by Drug Categories in the Matched Effectiveness Population
Time Frame: Baseline, at 6 and 9 months, and at 1, 2, 5, and 10 years
|
The Kaplan-Meier survival analysis technique was used to estimate probability.
|
Baseline, at 6 and 9 months, and at 1, 2, 5, and 10 years
|
|
Probability of Having ATG at Different Timepoints by Drug Categories in the Matched Effectiveness Population
Time Frame: Baseline, at 6 and 9 months, and at 1, 2, 5, and 10 years
|
The Kaplan-Meier survival analysis technique was used to estimate probability.
|
Baseline, at 6 and 9 months, and at 1, 2, 5, and 10 years
|
|
Probability of Having a Bleeding Event in Early Drug Intervention and Watchful Observation Matched Patients From the Safety Population
Time Frame: Baseline, at 6 and 9 months, and at 1, 2, 5, and 10 years
|
The Kaplan-Meier survival analysis technique was used to estimate probability.
|
Baseline, at 6 and 9 months, and at 1, 2, 5, and 10 years
|
|
Probability of Having Cataract in Early Drug Intervention and Watchful Observation Matched Patients From the Safety Population
Time Frame: Baseline, at 6 and 9 months, and at 1, 2, 5, and 10 years
|
The Kaplan-Meier survival analysis technique was used to estimate probability.
|
Baseline, at 6 and 9 months, and at 1, 2, 5, and 10 years
|
|
Probability of Having Diabetes in Early Drug Intervention and Watchful Observation Matched Patients From the Safety Population
Time Frame: Baseline, at 6 and 9 months, and at 1, 2, 5, and 10 years
|
The Kaplan-Meier survival analysis technique was used to estimate probability.
|
Baseline, at 6 and 9 months, and at 1, 2, 5, and 10 years
|
|
Probability of Having Hepatotoxicity in Early Drug Intervention and Watchful Observation Matched Patients From the Safety Population
Time Frame: Baseline, at 6 and 9 months, and at 1, 2, 5, and 10 years
|
The Kaplan-Meier survival analysis technique was used to estimate probability.
|
Baseline, at 6 and 9 months, and at 1, 2, 5, and 10 years
|
|
Probability of Having Hypertension in Early Drug Intervention and Watchful Observation Matched Patients From the Safety Population
Time Frame: Baseline, at 6 and 9 months, and at 1, 2, 5, and 10 years
|
The Kaplan-Meier survival analysis technique was used to estimate probability.
|
Baseline, at 6 and 9 months, and at 1, 2, 5, and 10 years
|
|
Probability of Having an Infection in Early Drug Intervention and Watchful Observation Matched Patients From the Safety Population
Time Frame: Baseline, at 6 and 9 months, and at 1, 2, 5, and 10 years
|
The Kaplan-Meier survival analysis technique was used to estimate probability.
|
Baseline, at 6 and 9 months, and at 1, 2, 5, and 10 years
|
|
Probability of Having Kidney Dysfunction in Early Drug Intervention and Watchful Observation Matched Patients From the Safety Population
Time Frame: Baseline, at 6 and 9 months, and at 1, 2, 5, and 10 years
|
The Kaplan-Meier survival analysis technique was used to estimate probability.
|
Baseline, at 6 and 9 months, and at 1, 2, 5, and 10 years
|
|
Probability of Having Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML), Chronic Myelomonocytic Leukemia (CMML) or Another Leukemia in Early Drug Intervention and Watchful Observation Matched Patients From the Safety Population
Time Frame: Baseline, at 6 and 9 months, and at 1, 2, 5, and 10 years
|
The Kaplan-Meier survival analysis technique was used to estimate probability.
|
Baseline, at 6 and 9 months, and at 1, 2, 5, and 10 years
|
|
Probability of Having MDS in Early Drug Intervention and Watchful Observation Matched Patients From the Safety Population
Time Frame: Baseline, at 6 and 9 months, and at 1, 2, 5, and 10 years
|
The Kaplan-Meier survival analysis technique was used to estimate probability.
|
Baseline, at 6 and 9 months, and at 1, 2, 5, and 10 years
|
|
Probability of Having Paroxysmal Nocturnal Hemoglobinuria (PNH) in Early Drug Intervention and Watchful Observation Matched Patients From the Safety Population
Time Frame: Baseline, at 6 and 9 months, and at 1, 2, 5, and 10 years
|
The Kaplan-Meier survival analysis technique was used to estimate probability.
|
Baseline, at 6 and 9 months, and at 1, 2, 5, and 10 years
|
|
Probability of Having a Thromboembolic Event in Early Drug Intervention and Watchful Observation Matched Patients From the Safety Population
Time Frame: Baseline, at 6 and 9 months, and at 1, 2, 5, and 10 years
|
The Kaplan-Meier survival analysis technique was used to estimate probability.
|
Baseline, at 6 and 9 months, and at 1, 2, 5, and 10 years
|
|
Probability of Having Myelofibrosis in Early Drug Intervention and Watchful Observation Matched Patients From the Safety Population
Time Frame: Baseline, at 6 and 9 months, and at 1, 2, 5, and 10 years
|
The Kaplan-Meier survival analysis technique was used to estimate probability.
|
Baseline, at 6 and 9 months, and at 1, 2, 5, and 10 years
|
|
Probability of Having a Bleeding Event by Drug Categories in the Matched Safety Population
Time Frame: Baseline, at 6 and 9 months, and at 1, 2, 5, and 10 years
|
The Kaplan-Meier survival analysis technique was used to estimate probability.
|
Baseline, at 6 and 9 months, and at 1, 2, 5, and 10 years
|
|
Probability of Having Cataract by Drug Categories in the Matched Safety Population
Time Frame: Baseline, at 6 and 9 months, and at 1, 2, 5, and 10 years
|
The Kaplan-Meier survival analysis technique was used to estimate probability.
|
Baseline, at 6 and 9 months, and at 1, 2, 5, and 10 years
|
|
Probability of Having Diabetes by Drug Categories in the Matched Safety Population
Time Frame: Baseline, at 6 and 9 months, and at 1, 2, 5, and 10 years
|
The Kaplan-Meier survival analysis technique was used to estimate probability.
|
Baseline, at 6 and 9 months, and at 1, 2, 5, and 10 years
|
|
Probability of Having Hepatotoxicity by Drug Categories in the Matched Safety Population
Time Frame: Baseline, at 6 and 9 months, and at 1, 2, 5, and 10 years
|
The Kaplan-Meier survival analysis technique was used to estimate probability.
|
Baseline, at 6 and 9 months, and at 1, 2, 5, and 10 years
|
|
Probability of Having an Infection by Drug Categories in the Matched Safety Population
Time Frame: Baseline, at 6 and 9 months, and at 1, 2, 5, and 10 years
|
The Kaplan-Meier survival analysis technique was used to estimate probability.
|
Baseline, at 6 and 9 months, and at 1, 2, 5, and 10 years
|
|
Probability of Having Kidney Dysfunction by Drug Categories in the Matched Safety Population
Time Frame: Baseline, at 6 and 9 months, and at 1, 2, 5, and 10 years
|
The Kaplan-Meier survival analysis technique was used to estimate probability.
|
Baseline, at 6 and 9 months, and at 1, 2, 5, and 10 years
|
|
Probability of Having AML, CMML or Another Leukemia by Drug Categories in the Matched Safety Population
Time Frame: Baseline, at 6 and 9 months, and at 1, 2, 5, and 10 years
|
The Kaplan-Meier survival analysis technique was used to estimate probability.
|
Baseline, at 6 and 9 months, and at 1, 2, 5, and 10 years
|
|
Probability of Having MDS by Drug Categories in the Matched Safety Population
Time Frame: Baseline, at 6 and 9 months, and at 1, 2, 5, and 10 years
|
The Kaplan-Meier survival analysis technique was used to estimate probability.
|
Baseline, at 6 and 9 months, and at 1, 2, 5, and 10 years
|
|
Probability of Having PNH by Drug Categories in the Matched Safety Population
Time Frame: Baseline, at 6 and 9 months, and at 1, 2, 5, and 10 years
|
The Kaplan-Meier survival analysis technique was used to estimate probability.
|
Baseline, at 6 and 9 months, and at 1, 2, 5, and 10 years
|
|
Probability of Having a Thromboembolic Event by Drug Categories in the Matched Safety Population
Time Frame: Baseline, at 6 and 9 months, and at 1, 2, 5, and 10 years
|
The Kaplan-Meier survival analysis technique was used to estimate probability.
|
Baseline, at 6 and 9 months, and at 1, 2, 5, and 10 years
|
|
Probability of Having Myelofibrosis by Drug Categories in the Matched Safety Population
Time Frame: Baseline, at 6 and 9 months, and at 1, 2, 5, and 10 years
|
The Kaplan-Meier survival analysis technique was used to estimate probability.
|
Baseline, at 6 and 9 months, and at 1, 2, 5, and 10 years
|
Collaborators and Investigators
This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.
Sponsor
Investigators
- Study Director: Novartis Pharmaceuticals, Novartis Pharmaceuticals
Study record dates
These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
May 5, 2022
Primary Completion (Actual)
November 3, 2023
Study Completion (Actual)
November 3, 2023
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
October 30, 2024
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
October 30, 2024
First Posted (Estimated)
November 1, 2024
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Estimated)
November 1, 2024
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
October 30, 2024
Last Verified
October 1, 2024
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- CETB115EJP05
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Aplastic Anemia (AA)
-
Assiut UniversityNot yet recruiting
-
The First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow UniversityRecruitingMDS (Myelodysplastic Syndrome) | Aplastic Anemia (AA)China
-
Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong...The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University; Zhejiang University; Wuhan... and other collaboratorsNot yet recruitingOvarian Insufficiency | Allogeneic Haematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation | Aplastic Anaemia (AA)China
-
Singapore General HospitalShanghai Yueyang Integrated Medicine Hospital; Singapore Bao Zhong Tang TCM...CompletedMyelodysplastic Syndrome (MDS) | Myelofibrosis (MF) | Thalassemia Intermedia | Aplastic Anaemia (AA)Singapore
-
Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de ParisNot yet recruitingSevere Aplastic Anemia | Idiopathic Aplastic Anemia | Moderate Aplastic Anemia Requiring Transfusions
-
Institute of Hematology & Blood Diseases Hospital...Not yet recruitingSevere Aplastic Anemia | Refractory Aplastic Anemia | Newly Diagnosed Aplastic Anemia
-
Chinese PLA General HospitalBeijing Friendship Hospital; Beijing 302 Hospital; The University of Hong Kong-Shenzhen... and other collaboratorsEnrolling by invitationSevere Aplastic Anemia | Severe Aplastic Anemia (SAA) | Severe Aplastic Anemia, RefractoryChina
-
University of UtahNovartisCompletedSevere Aplastic Anemia | Moderate Aplastic Anemia | Very Severe Aplastic AnemiaUnited States
-
Peking University People's HospitalRecruiting