Development of a Novel Endoscopic Index and Patient-reported Outcome Measure for Clinical Trials in Participants With Permanent Ileostomy

November 7, 2025 updated by: Alimentiv Inc.
To date, patients with Crohn's Disease (CD) and permanent ileostomies have been excluded from clinical trials for new treatments. To allow this patient population to be included in clinical trials, outcome and measurement tools are needed. This study aims to develop a Patient Reported Outcome (PRO) and Endoscopic Index (EI) for patients with Crohn's Disease (CD) and permanent ileostomy. The study will enroll about 50 participants and collect videos of endoscopies that are done as part of standard of care. The videos will be centrally read to identify features that represent a broad range of inflammation and will be used to develop the EI. Participants will also be asked to participate in interviews, to understand the symptoms and impacts that are most important to participants for the development of a PRO.

Study Overview

Status

Recruiting

Conditions

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Estimated)

50

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

    • Ontario
      • Hamilton, Ontario, Canada, L6S 0E2
        • Recruiting
        • McMaster University Medical Centre
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Neeraj Narula
        • Contact:
      • London, Ontario, Canada, L6S 0E2
        • Recruiting
        • LHSC - University Campus
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Vipul Jairath
        • Contact:
    • Minnesota
      • Rochester, Minnesota, United States, 55905
        • Recruiting
        • Mayo Clinic- Rochester
        • Contact:
        • Principal Investigator:
          • David Bruning
    • Missouri
      • St Louis, Missouri, United States, 63110
        • Recruiting
        • Washington University in St Louis School of Medicine
        • Contact:
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Parakkal Deepak
    • Ohio
      • Cleveland, Ohio, United States, 44195
        • Recruiting
        • Cleveland Clinic Foundation
        • Contact:
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Florian Rieder

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Approximately 50 participants who meet the inclusion and exclusion criteria will be enrolled in the study. The study population will ideally include approximately equal distributions of participants with disease activity categorized by a central reader as normal, mild, moderate, and severe, according to the VAS assessment. It is not possible to predetermine the number of participants with specific disease activity levels. The distribution of inflammatory disease activity across the study population will be monitored on an ongoing basis and recruitment strategies may be reviewed for opportunities to help maintain a balanced distribution. No more than 10 asymptomatic participants will be enrolled.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Adults (age ≥ 18 years) with a diagnosis of CD treated surgically with subtotal colectomy/proctocolectomy end ileostomy at least 12 months prior to the scheduled endoscopy procedure.
  2. Planning to have an ileoscopy procedure scheduled as part of routine medical care.
  3. Be proficient in the English language (ie, ability to read, write, speak, and understand English well enough to take part in the interview process without the aid of an interpreter).
  4. Able and willing to participate fully in all aspects of this study.
  5. Written informed consent must be obtained and documented.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. End or loop colostomy, end ileostomy for UC, continent ileostomy, ileal pouch anal anastomosis, end ileostomy with mucous fistula, double barrel ileostomy, urostomy, loop ostomy, or any type of end ileostomy not considered permanent at the time of enrolment (with no intent to restore continuity).
  2. Peristomal skin complications such as pyoderma gangrenosum, abscess, or any other severe peristomal skin inflammation.
  3. Stomal stenosis obviating ileoscopy, known small bowel stricture, major stoma prolapse, symptomatic parastomal hernia, parastomal hernia with subcutaneous loops of small bowel within the hernia, stoma in a crease/poorly fitting applicable resulting in severe peristomal skin irritation, or retracted stoma that prevents endoscopic evaluation.
  4. Any actively draining fistula (eg, peristomal or peri-anal).
  5. Evidence of a known small bowel stricture on cross-sectional imaging or inability to pass an endoscope within the past 6 months.
  6. Known active Clostridoides difficile or other enteric infection.
  7. Short bowel syndrome.
  8. Predominant symptom(s) arising from a retained rectal stump.
  9. Serious underlying disease other than CD that in the opinion of the investigator may interfere with the participant's ability to participate fully in the study procedures or provide nonconfounded descriptions of their CD and ostomy symptom experiences during the interview.
  10. Prior enrolment in the current study.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Develop a PRO instrument for patients with Crohn's Disease and Permanent Ileostomy
Time Frame: through study completion, and average of 1 year
Concept elicitation interviews focusing on the symptoms and impacts relevant to patients with CD and permanent ileostomy will be conducted and used to develop a PRO. Cognitive interviews will subsequently be conducted to determine respondent comprehension and relevance of the items.
through study completion, and average of 1 year
Evaluate the intrarater reliability of 100-mm VAS.
Time Frame: At baseline and 2 weeks
Central readers will score endoscopy videos using the VAS, on 2 separate occasions at least 2 weeks apart. Intrarater reliability will be quantified using ICC, which are equivalent to weighted Kappa statistics in the case of ordinal data.
At baseline and 2 weeks
Evaluate the intrarater reliability of RAM identified items.
Time Frame: At baseline and 2 weeks
Central readers will score endoscopy videos for items identified during a RAND/UCLA appropriateness method, on 2 separate occasions at least 2 weeks apart. Intrarater reliability will be quantified using ICC, which are equivalent to weighted Kappa statistics in the case of ordinal data.
At baseline and 2 weeks
Evaluate the intrarater reliability of Rutgeerts score and its component items.
Time Frame: At baseline and 2 weeks
Central readers will score endoscopy videos using the Rutgeerts Score, on 2 separate occasions at least 2 weeks apart. Intrarater reliability will be quantified using ICC, which are equivalent to weighted Kappa statistics in the case of ordinal data.
At baseline and 2 weeks
Evaluate the intrarater reliability of CDEIS and its component items.
Time Frame: At baseline and 2 weeks
Central readers will score endoscopy videos using the CDEIS, on 2 separate occasions at least 2 weeks apart. Intrarater reliability will be quantified using ICC, which are equivalent to weighted Kappa statistics in the case of ordinal data.
At baseline and 2 weeks
Evaluate the intrarater reliability of SES-CD and its component items.
Time Frame: At baseline and 2 weeks
Central readers will score endoscopy videos using the SES-CD, on 2 separate occasions at least 2 weeks apart. Intrarater reliability will be quantified using ICC, which are equivalent to weighted Kappa statistics in the case of ordinal data.
At baseline and 2 weeks
Evaluate the interrater reliability of 100-mm VAS.
Time Frame: At baseline
Central readers will score endoscopy videos using the VAS, on 2 separate occasions at least 2 weeks apart. Interrater reliability will be quantified using ICC, which are equivalent to weighted Kappa statistics in the case of ordinal data.
At baseline
Evaluate the interrater reliability of RAM identified items.
Time Frame: At baseline
Central readers will score endoscopy videos for items identified during a RAND/UCLA appropriateness method, on 2 separate occasions at least 2 weeks apart. Interrater reliability will be quantified using ICC, which are equivalent to weighted Kappa statistics in the case of ordinal data.
At baseline
Evaluate the interrater reliability of Rutgeerts score and its component items.
Time Frame: At baseline
Central readers will score endoscopy videos using the Rutgeerts score, on 2 separate occasions at least 2 weeks apart. Interrater reliability will be quantified using ICC, which are equivalent to weighted Kappa statistics in the case of ordinal data.
At baseline
Evaluate the interrater reliability of CDEIS and its component items.
Time Frame: At baseline
Central readers will score endoscopy videos using the CDEIS, on 2 separate occasions at least 2 weeks apart. Interrater reliability will be quantified using ICC, which are equivalent to weighted Kappa statistics in the case of ordinal data.
At baseline
Evaluate the interrater reliability of SES-CD and its component items.
Time Frame: At baseline
Central readers will score endoscopy videos using the SES-CD, on 2 separate occasions at least 2 weeks apart. Interrater reliability will be quantified using ICC, which are equivalent to weighted Kappa statistics in the case of ordinal data.
At baseline
Develop a novel index using a multiple regression approach with the dependent variables being the VAS and candidate independent variables including items having at least moderate interrater reliability.
Time Frame: through study completion, and average of 1 year
A prototype index will be created using the VAS for global assessment of severity as the dependent criterion. Prospective validation of the endoscopic index will be performed in a future initiative outside of the scope of this study.
through study completion, and average of 1 year

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Florian Rieder, The Cleveland Clinic
  • Principal Investigator: Vipul Jairath, Western University, Canada

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

June 19, 2024

Primary Completion (Estimated)

June 30, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

February 28, 2027

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

October 30, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 31, 2024

First Posted (Actual)

November 1, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

November 12, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 7, 2025

Last Verified

November 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Crohns Disease

Subscribe