The Effect of Vitamin D and Calcium Supplement on Overall Body Bone Density and Implant Stability in Posterior Maxilla

November 2, 2024 updated by: Mostafa Sharkawy, Al-Azhar University

The Effect of Vitamin D and Calcium Supplement on Overall Body Bone Density and Implant Stability in Posterior Maxilla: a Randomized Clinical Trial

The aim of the study is to evaluate the effect of Vit D and Calcium administration on allogragt bone maturation radiographically and histomorphometercally in maxillary sinus augmentation in cases of D4 bone density.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

12

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Assiut, Egypt
        • Alazhar University

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patient with residual bone height from 5 : 8 .
  • Patient with insufficient Vit D levels.
  • Patient with D4 bone density.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients that have aproporiate amount of Ca and Vit D.
  • Sinus pathology that precludes routine sinus augmentation.
  • Heavy smookers patients.
  • Systemic diseases that interfere with bone maturion.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Triple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Group A : Patients received vitamin D and calcium supplementation during the healing period
  1. Monthly intramuscular injections of vitamin D3 (300,000 I.U.) for three months, concurrent with six months of oral Maxical vitamin D supplementation post-implant placement.
  2. Daily intake of Maxical calcium carbonate tablets (600 mg elemental calcium) for six months.

The proposed implant site and adjacent tissues were disinfected using betadine mouthwash, and standard infiltration anesthesia was administered both buccally and palatally. A paracrestal incision was then made over the intended implant location, and the mucoperiosteal flap was elevated to expose the underlying bone. Subsequently, an osteotomy was prepared using a 2.0 mm pilot drill, maintaining irrigation with sterile saline. The osseodensification protocol was employed with Densah burs in increasing diameters (2 mm, 3 mm, 4 mm) under copious irrigation. Throughout the osteotomy preparation, implant angulation was regularly checked using a paralling pin. Upon encountering haptic feedback, pressure was modulated to achieve the desired depth. The implant was then installed using a surgical handpiece, and the final insertion torque was recorded using a torque wrench, ensuring successful placement.

During the healing period, the patients recieved Vitamin D and Calcium Supplements.

Experimental: Group B: Patients have not received any nutritional supplementation during the healing period.
The proposed implant site and adjacent tissues were disinfected using betadine mouthwash, and standard infiltration anesthesia was administered both buccally and palatally. A paracrestal incision was then made over the intended implant location, and the mucoperiosteal flap was elevated to expose the underlying bone. Subsequently, an osteotomy was prepared using a 2.0 mm pilot drill while maintaining irrigation with sterile saline. The osseodensification protocol was employed with Densah burs in increasing diameters (2 mm, 3 mm, 4 mm) under copious irrigation. Throughout the osteotomy preparation, implant angulation was regularly checked using a paraling pin. Upon encountering haptic feedback, pressure was modulated to achieve the desired depth. The implant was then installed using a surgical handpiece, and the final insertion torque was recorded using a torque wrench, ensuring successful placement. During the healing period, the patients did not receive vitamin or calcium supplements.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
The Implant Stability Quotient
Time Frame: Immediate post-operative, and 6 Months post-operative
The Implant Stability Quotient (ISQ) will be assessed using the Osstell device, which provides a stability score ranging from 0 ISQ to 100 ISQ. Higher ISQ values indicate greater implant stability, with 0 ISQ representing the lowest stability and 100 ISQ the highest. This measure allows for consistent, objective assessment of implant stability across time points.
Immediate post-operative, and 6 Months post-operative

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
DXA Scan
Time Frame: pre-operative, and 6 Months post-operative
DXA scan was carried out to T-score. minimum is - 4 and maximum is 1. the more T-score, the better the bone density.
pre-operative, and 6 Months post-operative
Vitamin D serum levels
Time Frame: Pre-operative, and 6 Months post-operative
Vitamin D serum levels (nanograms per milliliter (ng/ml)) will be represented as values, with higher values indicating a better vitamin D status. This measurement provides an objective assessment of vitamin D levels across participants.
Pre-operative, and 6 Months post-operative
Calcium Serum Level
Time Frame: Pre-operative, and 6 Months post-operative
Calcium serum levels (milligrams per deciliter (mg/dl)) will be measured, with higher values indicating better calcium status within the physiological range. This measurement provides an objective assessment of calcium levels across participants, allowing for consistent evaluation of calcium status.
Pre-operative, and 6 Months post-operative

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

October 2, 2021

Primary Completion (Actual)

March 1, 2023

Study Completion (Actual)

March 1, 2023

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

October 13, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 2, 2024

First Posted (Estimated)

November 5, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimated)

November 5, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 2, 2024

Last Verified

October 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Dental Implant

Clinical Trials on Patients received vitamin D and calcium supplementation during the healing period

Subscribe