Maxillary Sinus Floor Elevation With Gelatin Sponge Versus Allogenic Demineralized Bone Matrix

September 8, 2025 updated by: Ahmed Nagi Alghandour, Beni-Suef University

Evaluation of Simultaneous Implant Placement and Maxillary Sinus Floor Elevation With Gelatin Sponge Versus Allogenic Demineralized Bone Matrix: (A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial)

The post-extraction pneumatization of the maxillary sinus often compromises the ability of the maxillary molar to the optimal recipient of dental implants as a consequence of the quantitative reduction of the vertical bone height and the reduced bone quality of the region posterior maxillary segment.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Intervention / Treatment

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

14

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Banī Suwayf, Egypt
        • Beni-Suef University

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Patients of both sexes, with an age range of (25 to 55 years) with unilateral or bilateral edentulous posterior maxillary molar region with \ vertical residual bone height of (four to six millimeters), a minimal horizontal bone width of six millimeters bone width, acceptable interarch space, and fair inter-jaw anteroposterior, horizontal and vertical relationships.
  2. Proper general health and oral hygiene.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. The presence of sinusitis, local sinus pathosis, or a systemic disease that would affect the final treatment outcomes, bone remodeling process, or maxillary sinus health.
  2. Those patients with a history of previous bone graft, sinus lift, or failed implant.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Crossover Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Test group: Gelatin Sponge

The surgical intervention will be executed under local anesthesia. After the elevation of the full-thickness mucoperiosteal flap over the lateral wall of the maxillary sinus, a circular lateral window will be created by sinus low-speed bur grinding of the cortical ring to guard against the Shniederian membrane violation, followed by its separation along the sinus floor, lateral walls and the boundaries of the window to elaborate a smooth superior membrane elevation.

The created spaces beneath the elevated Shniederian membrane will be filled up by an absorbable gelatin sponge for the test group patients followed by the coverage of the side window with collagen membrane, secured with bone tacks to guard against the graft fibroblastic invasion.

The implant osteotomy will be initiated by pilot drill entries followed by sequential drills via the radiographic stent's sleeves to position the fixtures precisely into the pre-determined recipient sites. The Implant stability quotient (ISQ) will then be measured using an Osstell device after attaching intelligent implant pigs. Finally, the mucoperiosteal flaps will be sutured in place with 4-0 Prolene.
Active Comparator: Control group: Allogenic Demineralized Bone Matrix

The surgical intervention will be executed under local anesthesia. After the elevation of the full-thickness mucoperiosteal flap over the lateral wall of the maxillary sinus, a circular lateral window will be created by sinus low-speed bur grinding of the cortical ring to guard against the Shniederian membrane violation, followed by its separation along the sinus floor, lateral walls and the boundaries of the window to elaborate a smooth superior membrane elevation.

The created spaces beneath the elevated Shniederian membrane will be filled up by allogenic (DBM) for the control group patients, followed by the coverage of the side window with collagen membrane, secured with bone tacks to guard against the graft fibroblastic invasion.

The implant osteotomy will be initiated by pilot drill entries followed by sequential drills via the radiographic stent's sleeves to position the fixtures precisely into the pre-determined recipient sites. The Implant stability quotient (ISQ) will then be measured using an Osstell device after attaching intelligent implant pigs. Finally, the mucoperiosteal flaps will be sutured in place with 4-0 Prolene.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Stability
Time Frame: 6 months

Aided by the Osstell device, the authors will record the (ISQ) readings at implant placement and upon its exposure for prosthetic rehabilitation after six months as a secondary outcome. The mean (ISQ) of the maxillary sinus lift procedure would employ the mean of parallel and perpendicular (ISQ) readings to each implant long axis where one implant is inserted and the mean of the two implant readings when two implants are placed.

The numerical data concerning the primary and secondary outcomes will be recorded, scheduled, and submitted for statistical analysis

6 months
Vertical bone gain
Time Frame: 6 months
baseline and final outcome for measuring both groups' radiographic vertical bone height gain as a primary outcome aided by the (Blue-sky software) identification of four reference points along each implant buccal, palatal, mesial, and distal surface
6 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

December 1, 2024

Primary Completion (Actual)

September 1, 2025

Study Completion (Actual)

September 9, 2025

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

November 7, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 7, 2024

First Posted (Actual)

November 8, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimated)

September 10, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 8, 2025

Last Verified

September 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 27

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Maxillary Sinus Disease

Clinical Trials on Sinus lifting

Subscribe