Integrating PrEP Decision Making Into Counseling in Sexual and Reproductive Health Clinics

March 17, 2026 updated by: Yale University

Project Carmenta: Integrating PrEP Decision Making Into Counseling in Sexual and Reproductive Health Clinics

This study addresses the need for HIV prevention to be integrated into counseling visits at sexual and reproductive health clinics.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

The purpose of this study is to expand and enhance a PrEP decision aid to include the full array of available formulation options and then integrate its delivery into sexual and reproductive health settings during counseling visits, where PrEP can be provided to all women who are interested. Rooted in health implementation frameworks, this study evaluates health and implementation determinants simultaneously along: 1) innovation characteristics; 2) clinical encounter; 3) recipients; and 4) context.

In Aim 1, patients (n=15-20), clinicians (n=10), and staff (n=10) at sexual and reproductive health clinics across Greater New Haven, CT will be engaged for semi-structured interviews to expand and enhance an existing PrEP decision aid to include all available formulations and optimize its integration into sexual and reproductive health clinics. Qualitative interviews will inform infrastructure development to support PrEP delivery in sexual and reproductive health clinics.

In Aim 2 (a hybrid Type 2 effectiveness-implementation study), patients will be randomized (n=50) to receive either the PrEP decision aid or generic PrEP information prior to a clinician visit. In follow-up interviews immediately post-visit, and at Months 3 and 6, primary outcomes are clinical efficacy (PrEP initiation) and implementation (using Proctor definitions for feasibility, acceptability, penetration, and adoption) that are important for future planned scale-up.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

50

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

    • Connecticut
      • New Haven, Connecticut, United States, 06519
        • Recruiting
        • Yale Clinical and Community Research
        • Contact:
        • Contact:
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Jaimie P Meyer, MD
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Sangini S Sheth, MD

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Description

Patients (inclusion):

  • Woman
  • Aged 18 years or older
  • Have a uterus
  • Do not have HIV (by self-report)
  • Not currently on PrEP
  • Comfortable conversing in English or Spanish
  • Able to participate in informed consent procedures

Patients (exclusion):

  • People who cannot become pregnant (i.e., have had a hysterectomy or tubal ligation)
  • People who wish to become pregnant (will not qualify for pregnancy prevention counseling)
  • Have a scheduled visit with a member of the investigative team (to minimize risk of potential ascertainment bias)
  • Participants of Aim 1 cannot participate in Aim 2.

Sexual and Reproductive Health clinicians will be included if they provide sexual and reproductive health patient care at any of the participating sites. Clinic staff will be included if they work at any of the participating sites and have patient-facing or non-patient-facing roles .

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Prevention
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: PrEP Decision Aid
Participants randomized to the decision aid (active intervention arm), will interact with the enhanced PrEP decision aid in REDCap. This is an individualized, patient-facing decision aid that supports informed patient choice and is interactive. In contrast to shared decision aids that guide a clinical encounter, the participants uses the individualized decision aid prior to the clinical encounter to discretely assess HIV risk and build awareness before discussing with their clinician
Patient-facing decision-aid on PrEP that will be enhanced to include various formulations of available PrEP. Can be integrated into sexual and reproductive health clinics as part of counseling.
Other: Generic Information
Participants randomized to this arm will be asked to watch a CDC-produced video, "PrEP (Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis)" (available online free of charge through CDC website) that will serve as a time- and attention-based control.
Participants will be asked to watch a CDC-produced video, "PrEP (Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis" (available online free of charge through the CDC web site). The video will serve as a time- and attention- based control to the decision aid.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
PrEP initiation (prescribing)
Time Frame: 6 months
Whether PrEP was prescribed (yes/no) in the EHR within the 6-month time frame
6 months
Feasibility of implementing the enhanced PrEP decision aid in SRH settings, according to the Proctor taxonomy
Time Frame: 6 months
Feasibility is defined as the extent to which the enhanced PrEP decision aid can be successfully used in SRH clinic settings (qualitative).
6 months
Acceptability of the enhanced PrEP decision aid within SRH settings, according to users (Proctor taxonomy)
Time Frame: 6 months
Acceptability is defined as the user perception that the enhanced PrEP decision aid is acceptable in SRH settings.
6 months
Penetration (reach) of the enhanced decision aid within SRH clinics (Proctor taxonomy)
Time Frame: 6 months
Penetration (reach) of the intervention, measured by recruitment rate (number of participants enrolled per month)
6 months
Penetration (reach) of the enhanced decision aid within SRH clinics (Proctor taxonomy)
Time Frame: 6 months
Penetration (reach) of the intervention, measured by completion rate (percentage of participants completing 6-month interviews out of those enrolled)
6 months
Penetration (reach) of the enhanced decision aid within SRH clinics (Proctor taxonomy)
Time Frame: 6 months
Penetration (reach) of the intervention, measured by reasons for not meeting inclusion criteria
6 months
Adoption of the enhanced PrEP decision aid within SRH settings, according to users (Proctor taxonomy)
Time Frame: 6 months
Adoption of the enhanced decision aid into SRH clinics, assessed by whether PrEP was discussed during the visit (yes/no)
6 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
PrEP initiation (dispensing)
Time Frame: 6 months
Whether PrEP was dispensed (yes/no) in the EHR within the 6-month time frame
6 months
PrEP initiation (first use)
Time Frame: 6 months
Whether PrEP was started by the patient within the 6 months' time frame (yes/no)
6 months
PrEP adherence
Time Frame: 6 months
Non-pharmacokinetic: (subjective) 3-item self-report with 30-day look-back
6 months
PrEP adherence
Time Frame: 6 months
Non-pharmacokinetic: (objective) pharmacy refill data or injection dates for LAI.
6 months
PrEP adherence
Time Frame: 6 months
Pharmacokinetic: (objective) urine tenofovir levels (units detected/ not detected)
6 months
PrEP persistence
Time Frame: 6 months
Dates of completed PrEP encounters in EHR (i.e., clinic dates)
6 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Jaimie P Meyer, MD, Yale Clinical and Community Research, Yale School of Medicine
  • Principal Investigator: Sangini S Sheth, MD, Obstetrics, Gynecology & Reproductive Sciences, Yale School of Medicine

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

March 11, 2026

Primary Completion (Estimated)

March 1, 2027

Study Completion (Estimated)

September 5, 2027

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

October 30, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 8, 2024

First Posted (Actual)

November 12, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 19, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 17, 2026

Last Verified

March 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Reproductive Health

Clinical Trials on Generic Information

Subscribe