Activation of the Ankle Musculature in Basketball Players With Chronic Ankle Instability

February 21, 2025 updated by: Camilo Jose Cela University

Activation of the Ankle Musculature During the Sporting Gesture in Basketball Players With Chronic Ankle Instability A Case Control Study

Background: Lateral ankle sprain (LAS) is a very common injury in the general population and in the world of basketball in particular, initially Its recurrence rate is very high, generating chronic ankle instability (CAI), accompanied by decreased muscle activation in the ankle musculature and lack of motor control. The aim of this study is to evaluate the activation of the peroneal musculature during the sports gestures of layup and free throw, and the motor control of both in healthy patients and in patients with CAI.

Method: Using a surface electromyography study (sEMG) of 58 basketball players of amateur teams, 36 women and 22 men, with and without CAI, in the peroneus lateralis longus (PLL) and peroneus lateralis brevis musculature (PLB).

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Detailed Description

Design A case-control study was conducted. The entire procedure was carried out for human experimentation. The case control study followed the CONSORT guidelines.

Meassurement Muscle activity was recorded using an mDurance R surface EMG system (mDurance Solutions SL, Granada, Spain), a portable sEMG system that consists of three parts(i) A Shimmer3 EMG unit (Realtime Technologies Ltd., Dublin, Ireland), which is a bipolar sEMG sensor for muscle activity acquisition. Each Shimmer sensor is composed of two sEMG channels, with a sampling rate of 104 Hz. (ii) The mDurance mobile application (Android), which receives data from the Shimmer unit and sends it to a cloud service(iii) The mDurance cloud service, where the sEMG signals were stored, filtered and analysed, and reports were generated.

Surface electrode placement was performed following the recommendations of Surface EMG for Non-Invasive Muscle Assessment (SENIAM),bilaterally and parallel to the direction of the muscle fibres.

Protocol Firstly, anthropometric variables and personal information, training hours of the participants as well as ankle and lower limb injuries were collected through a Microsoft Forms.

In this study, changes in the sEMG signal of PLL and PLB in patients with and without CAI were investigated in the performance of various basketball-specific sport gestures . These changes in signal amplitude (root mean square) reflect the level of activation during the sporting gesture in the PLL and PLB muscles.

Maximal voluntary contraction (MVC) measurement First, participants were asked to perform a MVC, both PLL and PLB towards eversion and in the supine position, from the inversion position. Three maximal attempts of 5 seconds each, separated by 1 minute of rest, were performed. The best performance was chosen for statistical analysis.

Participants were verbally encouraged as the investigators conducted the assessment. The purpose of this test was to compare maximal amplitudes with submaximal amplitudes.

EMG recording in sport gesture The participants first warmed up for 10 minutes on the court, after which they were ready to shoot 3 series of 18 free throws each, with a rest of 35 seconds between each of them. The first sport gesture measured was the free throw, that is a sporting gesture that is always performed from a distance of 4.57 metres from the basket, which is 305 cm high. They were always performed with the same ball, with a perimeter size of 74.93 - 78 cm in the case of the male category and 72.4 - 73.7 cm in the case of the female category, as per National Basketball Association standards. To avoid fatigue, each shot was separated by a 10-15 second break and each series by 35 seconds. All participants in the study performed the throws without instructions or instructions on how to execute each personal routine.

This was followed by 1 series of 10 right-handed basket layups(first step starting with the right leg and second starting with the left leg) and another series of 10 left-handed basket layups (first step starting with the left leg and second starting with the right leg). In between, the players were asked to rest for 5 minutes.

The drive to the basket is a sporting gesture that consists of taking 3 steps towards the basket, (i) a short step towards the basket, (ii) a long step towards the basket, and (iii) a final jump.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

58

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Madrid
      • Villanueva de la Cañada, Madrid, Spain, 28692
        • Universidad Camilo José Cela

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Participants were selected through non-probabilistic sampling in several amateur basketball teams in the Autonomous Community of Madrid.

Both male and female basketball players with and without CAI were recruited A total of 58 subjects participated in the study with a mean age of 29.19±6.98 years a weight of 66,46±7,23 Kilograms and a height of 1,74±0,07 meters, with a body mass index (BMI), obtained by dividing weight by height squared (kg/m^2), average of 21.87±1.64, with no differences between the two groups.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Volunteers aged 18-45 years
  • Physical activity level of at least 3 hours per week
  • First sprain more than one year ago
  • No sprain in the 6 weeks prior to the test
  • Scored ≥ 11 on the functional ankle instability identification questionnaire.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Having undergone lower limb surgery and/or diseases that may influence neuromuscular control
  • Suffering from any type of incapacity to complete the proposed sporting gesture
  • Patients without CAI should not have a history of ankle sprains.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Control
Players of basketball team without CAI: this players have no history of ankle sprain
Case
Players of basketball team with CAI: scored ≥ 11 on the functional ankle instability identification questionnaire.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Measurement of the different activation patron of the peroneal muscles (electromyograpic analysis), in the different phases of the layup gesture , in patients with CAI and without CAI.
Time Frame: Up to 28 weeks
As a primary outcome measure, the investigators evaluated the difference in the activation of the PLL and PLB muscles both in patients suffering from CAI and in those who do not suffer from it, during the development of the layup.
Up to 28 weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Evaluation of moment of greatest activation (electromyographic evaluation) of the peroneal muscles, and motor control in layup gesture, in patients with CAI and without CAI.
Time Frame: Up to 28 weeks

As secondary outcome measure:

  1. To evaluate the moment of greatest solicitation of these muscles during both layup gesture in healthy patients and to assess the response of the peroneal muscles at the same moment in patients with CAI.
  2. To assess the motor control in CAI patients at the moment of greatest solicitation of the ankle and their possible response to a possible injury gesture.
Up to 28 weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: María Benito, Associate professor

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

December 27, 2023

Primary Completion (Actual)

May 16, 2024

Study Completion (Actual)

July 22, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

November 3, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 12, 2024

First Posted (Actual)

November 14, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 25, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 21, 2025

Last Verified

February 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 15_24_CQSI

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

IPD Plan Description

Other researchers participated by collecting data from the sample, but at no time did they have access to the personal data of said sample, only to the code that represented each of them (always coded information)

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Chronic Ankle Instability, CAI

Subscribe