Effectiveness of Trauma Treatment in the Specialist Health Care Services

November 13, 2024 updated by: Vestre Viken Hospital Trust

Towards Evidence-based PTSD Care in Norwegian Specialist Health Services - A Randomized Controlled Trial

Post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) is a common mental illness. Treatments for PTSD are regarded as highly effective, but a large-scale, prospective, longitudinal randomized controlled trial comparing the effectiveness of these treatments has been requested by the research community. This study aims to conduct a comprehensive investigation into the effectiveness of two prominent PTSD therapies, eye movement desensitization and reprocessing (EMDR) and cognitive therapy for PTSD (CT-PTSD), within the Norwegian specialist health care services. The study aims to compare the therapy effectiveness, including their impact on comorbid disorders, complex PTSD symptoms, and functional outcomes post-treatment. Patients will be randomly assigned to EMDR or CT-PTSD and given manualized therapy aligned with their treatment goals. Each arm aims to recruit 135 patients, resulting in a total sample size of 270 patients.

The main objective of this study is to examine the growth curves of the two methods and how patient characteristics affect their developments. Secondary short-term aims include (1) investigating the impact of EMDR and CT-PTSD on complex PTSD symptoms, (2) assessing effects on other clinical conditions and functional outcomes, and (3) exploring whether the therapeutic alliance mediates treatment effects. Secondary long-term aims are (1) to assess the long-term effects of EMDR and CT-PTSD on PTSD symptoms and (2) to explore the impact of extended or additional treatments on outcomes.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Participants will be recruited from Asker DPS, Bærum DPS, Drammen DPS, and Ringerike DPS. They were referred to DPS for PTSD treatment, either by general practitioners, other primary health care services in their municipality, or psychiatric hospitals. This study is a longitudinal multi-assessment 2-arm RCT and does not include a treatment as usual group. The standard treatment protocol includes up to 24 weekly sessions. Conversely, if no discernible improvement is seen after 10 sessions, it is recommended to terminate treatment. The clinical assessment consists of self-administered questionnaires collected through CheckWare, which is a digital platform developed for healthcare services. They will be asked to report symptoms of PTSD, depression, anxiety, psychosis, alcohol/drug use, functional outcomes, working alliance. Before treatment starts, patients will complete baseline assessments. Throughout the treatment phase, all patients will be requested to fill out self-administered questionnaires after each session.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

270

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

    • Viken
      • Drammen, Viken, Norway, 3004
        • Recruiting
        • Vestre Viken Health Trust
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • age ≥18 years
  • meeting criteria for PTSD based on the Clinician-Administered PTSD Scale for DSM-5 (CAPS-5) with a total score ≥23

Exclusion Criteria:

  • insufficient mastery of the Norwegian language
  • severe intellectual impairment (estimated IQ of 70 or less)
  • comorbid psychiatric illnesses in an acute phase where other types of treatment need to be prioritized (e.g. hospitalization)
  • history of EMDR or CT-PTSD treatment

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Eye Movement Desensitization and Reprocessing
Patients will receive EMDR as their main treatment method of PTSD. EMDR processes trauma memories while engaging in bilateral stimulation to help rewire the brain's response to trauma and decrease emotional distress.
Psychotherapy with EMDR. A therapist guides the client in recalling distressing events while simultaneously following a stimulus, like a moving light or tapping. The idea is that this bilateral stimulation helps reduce the intensity of the traumatic memory, allowing clients to gain perspective and lessen emotional distress associated with it. The standard treatment protocol includes up to 24 weekly sessions.
Other Names:
  • EMDR
Experimental: Cognitive Therapy for PTSD
Patients will receive CT-PTSD as their main treatment method of PTSD. CT-PTSD focuses on techniques such as cognitive restructuring and exposure therapy to help individuals reframe trauma and reduce intrusive memories and emotional distress.
Psychotherapy with CT-PTSD. A therapist works with the client to understand how they interpret their trauma and identify distorted thinking patterns that fuel their PTSD symptoms. Through guided discussions, written exercises, and sometimes "re-living" the trauma in a controlled way, clients learn to reshape these beliefs, gain a more balanced perspective, and reduce symptoms like hypervigilance, flashbacks, and avoidance behaviors. The standard treatment protocol includes up to 24 weekly sessions.
Other Names:
  • CT-PTSD

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Changes in PTSD-symptoms
Time Frame: From enrollment to the end of treatment at 24 weeks. Follow up at 3, 6 and 12 months
Changes in PTSD checklist for DSM-V (PCL-5) scores. The PCL-5 consists of 20 items on a 5-point Likert scale ranging from 0-4. Total scores range from 0-80, where a higher score signifies a worse outcome.
From enrollment to the end of treatment at 24 weeks. Follow up at 3, 6 and 12 months
Changes in PTSD-symptoms
Time Frame: From enrollment to the end of treatment at 24 weeks. Follow up at 3, 6 and 12 months
The International trauma questionnaire (ITQ) scores. The ITQ consists of 18 items on a 5-point Likert scale ranging from 0-4. Total scores range from 0-72, where a higher score signifies a worse outcome.
From enrollment to the end of treatment at 24 weeks. Follow up at 3, 6 and 12 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Changes in comorbid illnesses
Time Frame: From enrollment to the end of treatment at 24 weeks. Follow up at 3, 6 and 12 months
Changes in symptoms related to depression as measured with The Beck Depression Inventory-II (BDI). The BDI-II consists of 21 items on a 4-point Likert scale ranging from 0-3. Total scores range from 0-63, where a higher score signifies a worse outcome.
From enrollment to the end of treatment at 24 weeks. Follow up at 3, 6 and 12 months
Changes in comorbid illnesses
Time Frame: From enrollment to the end of treatment at 24 weeks. Follow up at 3, 6 and 12 months
Changes in symptoms related to anxiety as measured with The Beck Anxiety Inventory (BAI). The BAI consists of 21 items on a 4-point Likert scale ranging from 0-3. Total scores range from 0-63, where a higher score signifies a worse outcome.
From enrollment to the end of treatment at 24 weeks. Follow up at 3, 6 and 12 months
Changes in comorbid illnesses
Time Frame: From enrollment to the end of treatment at 24 weeks. Follow up at 3, 6 and 12 months
Changes in symptoms related to psychosis as measured with MULVARP. MULVARP consists of Prodromal Questionnaire (PQ-16). It consists of 16 items on a 4-point Likert scale ranging from 0-3. Total scores range from 0-48, where a higher score signifies a worse outcome.
From enrollment to the end of treatment at 24 weeks. Follow up at 3, 6 and 12 months
Changes in comorbid illnesses
Time Frame: From enrollment to the end of treatment at 24 weeks. Follow up at 3, 6 and 12 months
Changes in symptoms related to alcohol use as measured with Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test (AUDIT). The AUDIT consists of 10 items on a 5-point Likert scale ranging from 0-4, with the exception of questions 9 and 10 which have possible responses of 0, 2 and 4. Total scores range from 0-40, where a higher score signifies a worse outcome.
From enrollment to the end of treatment at 24 weeks. Follow up at 3, 6 and 12 months
Changes in comorbid illnesses
Time Frame: From enrollment to the end of treatment at 24 weeks. Follow up at 3, 6 and 12 months
Changes in symptoms related to drug use as measured with Drug Use Disorders Identification Test (DUDIT). The DUDIT consists of 11 items on a 5-point Likert scale ranging from 0-4, with the exception of questions 9 and 10 which have possible responses of 0, 2 and 4. Total scores range from 0-44, where a higher score signifies a worse outcome.
From enrollment to the end of treatment at 24 weeks. Follow up at 3, 6 and 12 months
Changes in functional outcomes
Time Frame: From enrollment to the end of treatment at 24 weeks. Follow up at 3, 6 and 12 months
Changes in Quality of Life questionnaire (QoL10) scores. The QoL10 consists of 10 items on a 5-point Likert scale ranging from 1-5. Total scores range from 0-50, where a higher score signifies a worse outcome.
From enrollment to the end of treatment at 24 weeks. Follow up at 3, 6 and 12 months
Changes in functional outcomes
Time Frame: From enrollment to the end of treatment at 24 weeks. Follow up at 3, 6 and 12 months
Changes in Work and Social Functioning (WSAS) scores. The WSAS consists of 5 items on a 9-point Likert scale ranging from 0-8. Total scores range from 0-40, where a higher score signifies a worse outcome.
From enrollment to the end of treatment at 24 weeks. Follow up at 3, 6 and 12 months

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
The impact of therapeutic alliance on treatment effectiveness
Time Frame: From enrollment to the end of treatment at 24 weeks
Changes in Working Alliance Inventory scores will be used to evaluate the interventions. The WAI consists of 16 items on a 5-point Likert scale ranging from 1-5. Total scores range from 16-80, where a higher score signifies a better alliance.
From enrollment to the end of treatment at 24 weeks
In case of re-referral: number of days until re-referral
Time Frame: From end of treatment to 12 months afterwards
Total number of days from the end of treatment until patients are re-referred to the clinics within the follow-up period
From end of treatment to 12 months afterwards

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Susie Fu, Ph.D, Cand. Psychol., Vestre Viken Health Trust

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

September 26, 2024

Primary Completion (Estimated)

October 1, 2028

Study Completion (Estimated)

December 1, 2030

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

September 26, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 13, 2024

First Posted (Actual)

November 15, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

November 15, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 13, 2024

Last Verified

November 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Quality of Life

Clinical Trials on Eye movement desensitization and reprocessing

Subscribe