Real-World Treatment Patterns and Outcomes Among Patients With Chronic Myeloid Leukemia in Earlier Lines of Therapy (ABL-2022-03)

November 15, 2024 updated by: Novartis Pharmaceuticals

Real-World Treatment Patterns and Outcomes Among Patients With Chronic Myeloid Leukemia in Earlier Lines of Therapy (ABL-2022-03)

This was a retrospective, non-interventional, observational cohort study using Optum's de-identified Clinformatics® Data Mart Database. Adult patients newly diagnosed with chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) treated with tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) were identified using the Optum database and classified into the following cohorts:

  • First treatment cohort: Patients newly diagnosed with CML who received first treatment with a TKI.
  • Second treatment cohort: Patients from first treatment cohort with a subsequent line of therapy (i.e., second treatment) with a TKI.

The observation period spanned from the start of data availability (i.e., 01 January 2007) to the earliest of end of data (i.e., 30 June 2022), end of continuous health plan enrollment, or death (if available). The index date was defined as the first treatment initiation for the first treatment TKI cohort and as the second treatment initiation for the second treatment TKI cohort. The baseline period consisted of the 6 months prior to the index date. The follow-up period started on the index date and ended at the earliest of end of observation period or hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT).

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

2043

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • New Jersey
      • East Hanover, New Jersey, United States, 07936
        • Novartis

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

This was a retrospective, noninterventional cohort study.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Adult patients who initiated their first treatment with imatinib, dasatinib, nilotinib, or bosutinib (conditional on Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approval dates) with 6 months continuous health plan enrollment prior to the first prescription fill date.
  • Patients with 2 or more diagnoses for CML (adult as of the first diagnosis for CML).
  • Patients had index date on or after first CML diagnosis.
  • Patients had no diagnoses for CML remission/relapse prior to index date.
  • Patients had no gastrointestinal stomach tumor (GIST) or chronic myelomonocytic leukemia (CMML) at any time.
  • Patients had no medical claims associated with a clinical trial during the baseline period.
  • Patients had no hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) during the baseline period.
  • Patients had no CML-related chemotherapy treatments for accelerated phase (AP)/blast crisis (BC) during the baseline period.
  • First treatment cohort:

    • Patients started first treatment for CML with imatinib, dasatinib, nilotinib, or bosutinib in 2012 or later.
    • Patients had no HSCT during the first treatment baseline period.
    • Patients had no CML-related chemotherapy treatment for AP/BC during the first treatment baseline period.
  • Second treatment cohort:

    • Patients started second treatment for CML with imatinib, dasatinib, nilotinib, or bosutinib in 2012 or later.
    • Patients had no HSCT from the first treatment baseline period up to second treatment initiation.
    • Patients had no CML-related chemotherapy treatment for AP/BC from the first treatment baseline period up to second treatment initiation.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
First Treatment Cohort
Patients newly diagnosed with CML who received first treatment with imatinib, dasatinib, nilotinib, or bosutinib.
Second Treatment Cohort
Patients from first treatment cohort with a subsequent line of therapy (i.e., second treatment) with imatinib, dasatinib, nilotinib, bosutinib, or ponatinib.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Treatment Patterns
Time Frame: Up to approximately 10 years
Tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) treatment management patterns in CML patients on first line or second line TKI were assessed.
Up to approximately 10 years

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Proportion of Days Covered (PDC)
Time Frame: Up to approximately 10 years
PDC was defined as the number of days of medication covered divided by the number of calendar days during the study period. The study period spanned from index date to the next line of therapy initiation (switch), hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT), initiation of a CML-related chemotherapy for accelerated phase (AP)/blast crisis (BC) (day prior to HSCT/CML chemotherapy) or last supply day if treatment gap ≥ 90 days, whichever occurred first. The index date was defined as the first treatment initiation for the first treatment cohort and as the second treatment initiation for the second treatment cohort.
Up to approximately 10 years
Number of Patients per PDC Category
Time Frame: Up to approximately 10 years

PDC was defined as the number of days of medication covered divided by the number of calendar days during the study period. The study period spanned from index date to the next line of therapy initiation (switch), HSCT, initiation of a CML-related chemotherapy for AP/BC (day prior to HSCT/CML chemotherapy) or last supply day if treatment gap ≥ 90 days, whichever occurred first. The index date was defined as the first treatment initiation for the first treatment cohort and as the second treatment initiation for the second treatment cohort.

PDC categories included:

  • PDC (%) ≤ 50%
  • PDC (%) ≤ 70%
  • PDC (%) ≥ 80%
  • PDC (%) > 90%
Up to approximately 10 years
Time to Treatment Discontinuation
Time Frame: Up to approximately 10 years
Up to approximately 10 years
Time to Treatment Switch
Time Frame: Up to approximately 10 years
Up to approximately 10 years
Time to First Treatment Interruption
Time Frame: Up to approximately 10 years
Up to approximately 10 years
Time to First Dose Reduction
Time Frame: Up to approximately 10 years
Up to approximately 10 years
Rate of Treatment Discontinuation
Time Frame: Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, and years 2, 3, 4
Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, and years 2, 3, 4
Rate of Treatment Switching
Time Frame: Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, and years 2, 3, 4
Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, and years 2, 3, 4
Rate of Treatment Interruption
Time Frame: Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, and years 2, 3, 4
Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, and years 2, 3, 4
Rate of Dose Reduction
Time Frame: Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, and years 2, 3, 4
Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, and years 2, 3, 4
Number of Patients With Non-optimal Treatment (NOPT)
Time Frame: Up to approximately 10 years

Three categories of NOPT were defined:

  1. Base Case: NOPT was defined as 1) treatment switch ≤ 6 months post-index, 2) temporary treatment interruption/dose reduction ≤6 months post-index followed by treatment switch ≤12 months post-index, or 3) PDC ≤50%.
  2. Sensitivity 1: NOPT was defined as 1) treatment switch ≤ 6 months post-index, 2) temporary treatment interruption/dose reduction ≤6 months post-index followed by treatment switch ≤12 months post-index, or 3) PDC ≤70%.
  3. Sensitivity 2: NOPT was defined as treatment switch ≤ 6 months post-index.

Index date was defined as the first treatment initiation for the first treatment cohort and as the second treatment initiation for the second treatment cohort.

Up to approximately 10 years
Number of Patients With NOPT by First Generation TKI
Time Frame: Up to approximately 10 years

Three categories of NOPT were defined:

  1. Base Case: NOPT was defined as 1) treatment switch ≤ 6 months post-index, 2) temporary treatment interruption/dose reduction ≤6 months post-index followed by treatment switch ≤12 months post-index, or 3) PDC ≤50%.
  2. Sensitivity 1: NOPT was defined as 1) treatment switch ≤ 6 months post-index, 2) temporary treatment interruption/dose reduction ≤6 months post-index followed by treatment switch ≤12 months post-index, or 3) PDC ≤70%.
  3. Sensitivity 2: NOPT was defined as treatment switch ≤ 6 months post-index.

Index date was defined as the first treatment initiation for the first treatment cohort and as the second treatment initiation for the second treatment cohort.

Up to approximately 10 years
Number of Patients With NOPT by Second Generation TKI
Time Frame: Up to approximately 10 years

Three categories of NOPT were defined:

  1. Base Case: NOPT was defined as 1) treatment switch ≤ 6 months post-index, 2) temporary treatment interruption/dose reduction ≤6 months post-index followed by treatment switch ≤12 months post-index, or 3) PDC ≤50%.
  2. Sensitivity 1: NOPT was defined as 1) treatment switch ≤ 6 months post-index, 2) temporary treatment interruption/dose reduction ≤6 months post-index followed by treatment switch ≤12 months post-index, or 3) PDC ≤70%.
  3. Sensitivity 2: NOPT was defined as treatment switch ≤ 6 months post-index.

Index date was defined as the first treatment initiation for the first treatment cohort and as the second treatment initiation for the second treatment cohort.

Up to approximately 10 years
All-cause Healthcare Resource Utilization (HRU) per Patient per Year in NOPT Patients Compared to Reference Subgroup
Time Frame: 2 years

The reference subgroup was defined based on the following treatment adherence and persistence criteria denoting potential indicators of TKI treatment success based on observations from the clinical practice: (1) high treatment adherence (defined as PDC >90%) with no observed treatment discontinuation anytime post-index; or (2) high treatment adherence (defined as PDC >90%) with treatment discontinuation occurring >12 months post-index.

All-cause HRU included:

  • Inpatient admission
  • Inpatient days
  • Emergency department visits
  • Outpatient visits
2 years
CML-related HRU per Patient per Year in NOPT Patients Compared to Reference Subgroup
Time Frame: 2 years

The reference subgroup was defined based on the following treatment adherence and persistence criteria denoting potential indicators of TKI treatment success based on observations from the clinical practice: (1) high treatment adherence (defined as PDC >90%) with no observed treatment discontinuation anytime post-index; or (2) high treatment adherence (defined as PDC >90%) with treatment discontinuation occurring >12 months post-index.

All-cause HRU included:

  • Inpatient admission
  • Inpatient days
  • Emergency department visits
  • Outpatient visits
2 years
All-cause Direct Healthcare Costs per Patient per Year in NOPT Patients Compared to Reference Subgroup
Time Frame: 2 years

The reference subgroup was defined based on the following treatment adherence and persistence criteria denoting potential indicators of TKI treatment success based on observations from the clinical practice: (1) high treatment adherence (defined as PDC >90%) with no observed treatment discontinuation anytime post-index; or (2) high treatment adherence (defined as PDC >90%) with treatment discontinuation occurring >12 months post-index.

All-cause direct healthcare costs included:

  • Total medical costs
  • Inpatient costs
  • Outpatient costs
  • Emergency department costs
2 years
CML-related Direct Healthcare Costs per Patient per Year in NOPT Patients Compared to Reference Subgroup
Time Frame: 2 years

The reference subgroup was defined based on the following treatment adherence and persistence criteria denoting potential indicators of TKI treatment success based on observations from the clinical practice: (1) high treatment adherence (defined as PDC >90%) with no observed treatment discontinuation anytime post-index; or (2) high treatment adherence (defined as PDC >90%) with treatment discontinuation occurring >12 months post-index.

All-cause direct healthcare costs included:

  • Total medical costs
  • Inpatient costs
  • Outpatient costs
  • Emergency department costs
2 years

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Director: Novartis Pharmaceuticals, Novartis Pharmaceuticals

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

May 23, 2023

Primary Completion (Actual)

November 30, 2023

Study Completion (Actual)

November 30, 2023

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

November 15, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 15, 2024

First Posted (Estimated)

November 18, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimated)

November 18, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 15, 2024

Last Verified

November 1, 2024

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Chronic Myeloid Leukemia

Subscribe