Study to Investigate the Potential Pharmacological Effect of Oral Palmitoylethanolamide (PEA) Therapy in the Management of Low Back Pain (Neuropathic Pain)

November 14, 2025 updated by: Dr. Amjad Khan, Liaquat University of Medical & Health Sciences

Study to Investigate the Potential Pharmacological Effect of Oral Palmitoylethanolamide (PEA) Therapy in the Management of Low Back Pain (Neuropathic Pain): A Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled, Parallel-group Clinical Trial

This clinical trial aims to evaluate the potential therapeutic effects of oral supplemental Palmitoylethanolamide (PEA) Phytosome® in managing neuropathic low back pain. The study will involve adult participants diagnosed with neuropathic pain according to established criteria. Eligible participants will be randomized into three groups to receive either PEA Phytosome® supplementation as two different doses or a placebo for a specified period. Data collection will include demographic information, baseline pain intensity, quality of life assessments, and functional outcomes. The primary endpoint will be the reduction in pain intensity, while secondary endpoints will include improvements in quality of life and functional capacity. Safety and tolerability of the supplement will also be assessed. This trial seeks to provide robust clinical evidence of the potential pharmacological effect of PEA's Phytosome® as a potential adjunctive treatment for neuropathic low back pain.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Neuropathic low back pain arises from nerve damage or dysfunction, leading to chronic pain characterized by burning, tingling, or shooting sensations. This condition significantly impacts quality of life and is often refractory to conventional treatments. Palmitoylethanolamide (PEA) is an endogenous lipid mediator known for its anti-inflammatory, analgesic, and neuroprotective properties. PEA exerts its effects by modulating the endocannabinoid system and reducing the activation of mast cells and glial cells, which play a crucial role in chronic pain mechanisms. Its potential as a therapeutic agent for neuropathic pain has been demonstrated in preclinical and clinical studies, making it a promising candidate for managing neuropathic low back pain.

In the present randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group clinical trial, the investigators aim to evaluate the therapeutic effect of a novel bioavailable oral formulation of PEA's Phytosome® in the management of neuropathic low back pain in healthy adult population.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

120

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Peshawar, Pakistan
        • Lady Reading Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Healthy adults, both Male or female aged ≥ 18 years and ≤ 80 years;
  • Diagnosed with neuropathic lower back pain for at least 3 months, as confirmed by clinical evaluation and DN4 (neuropathic pain 4 questions) screening questionnaire with score ≥4.
  • Pain intensity score ≥ 5 measured by NRS (Numerical Rating Scale) score, over the past week.
  • Willingness to adhere to study protocol, including visits, assessments, and self-reporting of symptoms.
  • Ability to provide informed consent and comply with study requirements.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Known intolerance or allergy to any component of the tested nutraceuticals
  • Presence of acute systemic disease
  • Presence of significant organic pathology
  • Current or past history of alcohol or drug abuse
  • History of malignancy within the past 5 years
  • Any significant concomitant disease or clinical condition that could compromise participant safety or interfere with study completion
  • Women of childbearing potential not using reliable contraceptive methods
  • Pregnancy or breastfeeding
  • Severe psychiatric disorders (e.g., major depression, schizophrenia) that could affect pain perception or adherence.
  • Inability to adhere to the study requirements due to lifestyle, transportation, or cognitive impairment.
  • Use of other cannabinoid-based therapies, investigational drugs, or concurrent participation in another clinical trial.
  • Dependence on opioid analgesics or recent opioid use that may interfere with pain assessment.
  • Current use of other supplements with potential anti-inflammatory or analgesic effects, including Omega-3 Fatty Acids, Turmeric/Curcumin, Glucosamine and Chondroitin, Boswellia Serrata, Methylsulfonylmethane.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Supportive Care
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: 300 mg Palmitoylethanolamide (PEA) group
Participants will receive 2 × 300 mg oral PEA Phytosome® tablets daily for one week, and a single tablet from week-7 to week-8, as add-on to the standard of care.
Oral supplement intake
Experimental: 450 mg Palmitoylethanolamide (PEA) group
Participants will receive 1 × 450 mg oral PEA Phytosome® tablet, and 1 placebo tablet daily for 8-weeks as add-on to the standard of care.
Placebo
Oral supplement intake
Placebo Comparator: Control group
Participants will receive 2 × placebo tablets daily for 8-weeks as add-on to the standard of care.
Placebo

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Supplement effect on intensity of neuropathic low back pain
Time Frame: 8 weeks
Change in neuropathic pain intensity measured by the Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) score, with 0 representing no pain and 10 representing the worst pain.
8 weeks
Supplement effect on neuropathic low back symptoms pain as experienced by the patients
Time Frame: 8 weeks
Change in The Douleur Neuropathique 4 (DN4) questionnaire score, a 10-item, clinician-administered tool used to identify neuropathic pain. A score of 4 or more out of 10 is the cut-off for defining the presence of neuropathic pain.
8 weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Supplement effect on patients degree of disability
Time Frame: 8 weeks
Change in degree of disability due to neuropathic back pain assessed by Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) questionnaire. A score of 0-20% indicates minimal disability, 21-40% moderate disability, 41-60% severe disability, 61-80% crippled, and 81-100% bedridden or completely disabled.
8 weeks
Supplement effect on patients quality of life
Time Frame: 8 weeks
Short Form Health Survey 12 (SF-12) questionnaire score. The SF-12 questionnaire assesses quality of life through 12 items, producing two summary scores: the Physical Component Summary (PCS) and the Mental Component Summary (MCS). Higher scores on both components indicate better physical and mental health, respectively.
8 weeks
Supplement effect on patients sleep quality
Time Frame: 8 weeks
Change in patients sleep quality as measured by the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI) score. A score of 5 or higher suggests clinically significant sleep disturbances.
8 weeks
Change in the number of times the rescue Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) needed per week
Time Frame: 8 weeks
Change in the weekly NSAIDs doses intake
8 weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

January 28, 2025

Primary Completion (Actual)

June 15, 2025

Study Completion (Actual)

June 23, 2025

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

November 15, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 15, 2024

First Posted (Actual)

November 19, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

November 18, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 14, 2025

Last Verified

November 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Low Back Pain

Clinical Trials on Control group

Subscribe