Ultrasound-based Artificial Intelligence for Classification of Carpal Tunnel Syndrome

November 17, 2024 updated by: Shi Xiaochen, Peking University People's Hospital

Ultrasound-based Artificial Intelligence for Grading of Carpal Tunnel Syndrome, a Multicenter Study in China

Carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) is one of the most prevalent peripheral neuropathies, impacting approximately 4% of the general population. It is typically classified into three degrees: mild, moderate, and severe. Accurate grading of carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) is essential for determining appropriate treatment options, thereby playing a crucial role in optimizing patient outcomes. Electrophysiological testing (EST) is a key parameter for grading carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS). However, it is limited by several factors, including its invasive nature, poor reproducibility, and reduced sensitivity for detecting early-stage disease. Recently, ultrasound has gained widespread acceptance among clinicians for the assessment and grading of CTS. Nonetheless, radiologists often encounter challenges in this process due to the variability in image quality, differences in experience, and inherent subjectivity.

To address these issues, artificial intelligence presents a promising solution. Therefore, this study aims to develop a deep learning model for grading CTS by leveraging multimodal imaging features, including B-mode ultrasound, superb microvascular imaging (SMI), and elastography. Additionally, the investigators intend to validate the model's effectiveness by testing it with images from various clinical centers, ensuring its generalizability across different clinical settings.

Study Overview

Status

Active, not recruiting

Intervention / Treatment

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Estimated)

500

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Beijing. PR
      • Beijing, Beijing. PR, China, 100032
        • Peking University People's Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sampling Method

Probability Sample

Study Population

The investigators intend to perform ultrasound examinations for patients with idiopathic CTS adhering to specific inclusion and exclusion criteria, aiming to develop and test the efficacy of AI model for CTS grading.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • those who have complained about associated symptoms about CTS, including pain, numbness, and weakness of hand.
  • those who perform ultrasound examinations of median nerve within 1 week of the symptom.
  • those who have electrophysilogical test results as reference standard.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • those who had a surgery in the affected hand.
  • those who had a trauma or fracture in the affected hand.
  • those who had rheumatoid-related conditions, autoimmune diseases, and endocrine disorders.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
Prospective test set
The investigators intend to perform ultrasound examinations for the participants with CTS.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
grading of CTS
Time Frame: baseline
baseline

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

November 15, 2024

Primary Completion (Estimated)

June 30, 2025

Study Completion (Estimated)

December 30, 2026

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

November 17, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 17, 2024

First Posted (Estimated)

November 20, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimated)

November 20, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 17, 2024

Last Verified

November 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

UNDECIDED

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Ultrasound

Clinical Trials on ultrasound examination

Subscribe