Kinesiotaping With Kaltenborn Mobilization Effects on Adhesive Capsulitis Recovery.

November 19, 2024 updated by: Riphah International University

Effects of Kinesiotaping With Kaltenborn Mobilization on the Rate of Recovery in Freezing Stage of Adhesive Capsulitis

The purpose of the study is to determine the Effects of Kinesiotaping with Kaltenborn Mobilization on Rate of Recovery in Freezing Stage of Adhesive Capsulitis. A randomized control trial was conducted at Habib physiotherapy complex Peshawar and Pak physio rehabilitation Peshawar. The sample size was 34 calculated through open-epi tool. The participants were divided into two groups each having 17 participants. The study duration was six months. Consecutive sampling technique was used for the selection of subjects for the study that fulfills the eligibility criteria was included in the study. Block randomization was used to allocate subjects into interventional and control arms of the trial. The first two patients who fulfill the criteria were allocated to interventional arm and the next two patients were allocated in control arm till completion of the sample size for both the arms. Tools used in this study are Goniometer, SPADI, NPRS. Data was collected before and immediately after the application of interventions. Data analyzed through SPSS version 20

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

Human kinematics is always in spotlight and considered as a unique feature in which shoulder joint kinematics have grabbed the attention of researchers. The complexity of the shoulder joint is evident from the literature. It is having high functional demands and wide range of motion than any other joint in the human body. It is balanced by stability and mobility provided by number of ligaments, capsule, labrum and active muscles. However sometimes this balance is disturbed that results in different musculoskeletal complaints and pathologies in which one of them is adhesive capsulitis (1).The exact cause of adhesive capsulitis remains controversial.

However calcific tendinitis, glenohumeral arthritis, acromioclavicular arthritis, dupuytrens, contractures, breast cancer, cardiac issues, autonomic neuropathy, stroke, cervical disc disorders, humeral fractures, hypoadrenalism, Parkinson's disease are some of the known causes (7). It can also occur as a sequalae of osteoarthritis, rheumatoid arthritis or joint dislocation and fracture (8). The evaluation of adhesive capsulitis starts from a thorough history and proceeding towards physical examination, clinical tests and radiographic techniques. The patient usually recalls a mild trauma or accident that has caused damage to the shoulder joint, as well as limited range of motion especially external rotation, sleep disturbance and pain on insertion of deltoid and unable to perform overhead activities (9). Physical examination exposes loss of natural swing of arm. Scapular dyskinesis is also noted in some cases. shoulder joint may be painful to touch and muscle atrophy can be present. Loss of ROM is seen (9). Fasting blood sugar is performed in patients having diabetes mellitus. Since inflammation is its feature so erythrocyte sedimentation rate is suggested. Some special tests are also positive in this condition that are Neer impingement sign and Hawkin's-Kneddy. These tests are positive due to capsular stretch and internal impingement that occurs in this condition simultaneously but due to adhesive capsulitis (10). Adhesive capsulitis can be diagnosed using imaging studies like radiographs, magnetic resonance imaging, arthrography, ultrasound, and nuclear medicine. Magnetic resonance imaging is considered the gold standard due to its soft tissue visualization and scanning capabilities. However, some studies suggest that it may not accurately diagnose the condition due to the similar thickness of the Page 3 of 11 (Draft) coracohumeral ligament (10 11). Rahee Mulmulay and Himanshu Pathak et al describes kinesiotaping along with Kaltenborn mobilization and Kaltenborn mobilization alone on pain, range of motion and functional disability in patients with adhesive capsulitis is effective treatment to significant improvement in terms of pain, range of motion and functional disability (12). Literature review: A systematic and evidence based search of relevant literature was performed by utilizing PubMed and Google Scholar as search engines and the key words used were Kinesiotaping, mobilization, Kaltenborn mobilization, adhesive capsulitis, frozen shoulder conventional physical therapy, freezing stage. The purpose of the literature review is to find out the pre-existing literature regarding the Kinesiotaping with Kaltenborn mobalization effects on adhesive capsulitis recovery. In 2017 a randomized controlled trial conducted by Rahee Mulmulay and Himanshu Pathak et al on effectiveness of kinesiotaping along with kaltenborn mobilization and kaltenborn mobilization alone on pain, range of motion and functional disability in patients with adhesive capsulitis stated that there is significance improvement in terms of pain, range of motion and functional disability (12). In 2019 a randomized controlled trial conducted by Sumit Raghav et in India on effectiveness of Mulligan versus Kaltenborn mobilization in the management of adhesive capsulitis. The results of the study showed significant improvement in terms of pain, range of motion and functional disability (13).

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

34

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • Pakistan
    • Federal
      • Islamabad, Federal, Pakistan, 44000
        • Riphah International University

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Both genders male and female.
  • Age 35-60 years.
  • Acute shoulder pain (10 to 36 weeks).
  • Patients with diabetes mellitus.
  • Referred and diagnose patients

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Any fracture related to the shoulder joint.
  • Post operative case and osteoporotic.
  • Shoulder with manipulation under anesthesia.
  • Steroid injection therapy
  • Diagnosed rheumatoid arthritis
  • Neurological deficits / Hemiplegics

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Experimental Group: 1

Experimental group was treated with kinesiotaping along with Kaltenborn mobilization AP and PA glides. The treatment protocol was administered in 10 reps' and 3 sets, and AP and PA glide were given.

Kinesiotaping: First the deltoid area was dried and cleansed, excessive hair were trimmed, the KT was cut into Y-shape and I- shape, after that whole length of the thumb was used to stretch the tape for about 15% to 25% and then from 25% to 50%. The tape was rubbed vigorously for few seconds, heat activates glue. The whole procedure takes about 15 to 20 minutes.
Other: KinesioTaping and Keltonborn Mobilization
Experimental group was treated with kinesiotape and kaltenborn mobilization while the non experimental group was treated with conventional therapy along with kaltenborn mobilization.
Other Names:
  • Conventional Therapy with Keltonborn Mobilization
Active Comparator: Control Group: 2
Control was treated with Kaltenborn mobilization AP and PA glides along with conservative treatment and Home plane exercises.
Other: KinesioTaping and Keltonborn Mobilization
Experimental group was treated with kinesiotape and kaltenborn mobilization while the non experimental group was treated with conventional therapy along with kaltenborn mobilization.
Other Names:
  • Conventional Therapy with Keltonborn Mobilization

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Numerical pain rating scale
Time Frame: 3 times a week for 3 weeks
The Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS) (an outcome measure) that is a unidimensional measure of pain intensity in adults,[1][2][3] including those with chronic pain due to rheumatic diseases The 11-points of numeric pain rating scale ranges from '0' representing one with no pain, 1 to 3 with mild pain, 4 to 7 with moderate pain and 8 to 10 representing the pain extreme.
3 times a week for 3 weeks
shoulder pain and disability index
Time Frame: 3 times a week for 3 weeks
The Shoulder Pain and Disability Index (SPADI) is a self-administered questionnaire that consists of two dimensions, one for pain and the other for functional activities. The pain dimension consists of five questions regarding the severity of an individual's pain. Functional activities are assessed with eight questions designed to measure the degree of difficulty an individual has with various activities of daily living that require upper-extremity use. The SPADI takes 5 to 10 minutes for a patient to complete and is the only reliable and valid region-specific measure for the shoulder.
3 times a week for 3 weeks
Goniometry
Time Frame: 3 times a week for 3 weeks

A goniometer is a device that measures an angle or permits the rotation of an object to a definite position. In orthopedics, the former description applies more. The art and science of measuring the joint ranges in each joint plane are called goniometry.

Goniometric measurements were obtained by aligning the goniometer arms with bony landmarks and aligning the fulcrum of the goniometer with the approximate location of the glenohumeral joint axis.
3 times a week for 3 weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Riphah International University

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Lal Gul Khan, MS, Riphah International University

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

August 29, 2021

Primary Completion (Actual)

January 22, 2022

Study Completion (Actual)

February 21, 2022

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

September 12, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 19, 2024

First Posted (Estimated)

November 21, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimated)

November 21, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 19, 2024

Last Verified

November 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • RiphahIU Neelo Gul

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Adhesive Capsulitis of Shoulder

Clinical Trials on KinesioTaping and Keltonborn Mobilization

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

CROs by country

CROs in Hong Kong

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

Subscribe