Learning Curve of Ultrasound-Guided Suprainguinal Fascia Iliaca Block: A Prospective Observational Study

June 18, 2025 updated by: Senay Canikli
Competence in ultrasound-guided regional anesthesia (UGRA) requires practitioners to acquire cognitive and technical skills. Various difficulties have been identified in anesthesia residents' learning UGRA skills. There is currently no approved UGRA curriculum for residents, and the level of UGRA proficiency achieved during residency may vary significantly. However, no specific training criteria have been defined for this block. It is important to establish criteria to evaluate the adequacy of education.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Compared to other nerve localization techniques, the benefits of UGRA include higher nerve block success rates, faster onset times, reduced local anesthetic volumes, and a lower risk of local anesthetic-related complications. Most experts now consider ultrasound guidance as the standard of care for peripheral nerve blocks. Successfully performing a UGRA procedure requires a triad of three distinct but interrelated skills: image acquisition, anatomical interpretation, and hand-eye coordination.

In our clinic, we routinely perform various nerve block techniques under ultrasound guidance during the perioperative period, both for postoperative analgesia and as a primary anesthetic method. Specifically, in our clinic, the suprainguinal fascia iliaca block (SIFIB) is routinely applied for postoperative analgesia, particularly in orthopedic cases. Before performing a nerve block procedure, resident doctors in our clinic undergo standard training and subsequently perform blocks under the supervision and support of experienced specialists and academicians.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

10

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Ilkadım
      • Samsun, Ilkadım, Turkey, 55025
        • Samsun University Samsun Training and Research Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Anesthesia residents with less than 2 years of anesthesia experience who have never performed a SIFIB before.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

- Anesthesia residents with less than 2 years of anesthesia experience who have never performed a SIFIB before

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Having previously performed a SIFIB

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Block success
Time Frame: 20 minute

"Additionally, to evaluate the success of the procedure more objectively, the following parameters will be assessed using a 5-point Likert scale (1: Very low, 2: Low, 3: Moderate, 4: High, 5: Very high). For the procedure to be considered successful, a score of 4 must be obtained for each parameter. These parameters include:

  • Placement of the ultrasound probe
  • Visualization of anatomical structures (muscle, bone, fascia, vessels)
  • Optimization of needle localization
  • Spread of the drug beneath the iliac fascia"
20 minute

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Block performance time
Time Frame: 20 minute
The block performance times of each practitioner will be recorded, and the average performance time will be calculated.
20 minute

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Investigators

  • Study Director: Senay Canikli Adıgüzel, Samsun University

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

January 20, 2025

Primary Completion (Actual)

May 30, 2025

Study Completion (Actual)

June 10, 2025

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

November 24, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 24, 2024

First Posted (Actual)

November 27, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

June 22, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 18, 2025

Last Verified

June 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • GOKAEK 2024/21/6

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

IPD Plan Description

Study data can be shared upon appropriate request after the study is completed.

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Learning Curve

Subscribe