Mechanisms of Mindfulness Intervention:Rumination Behavioral Experiments

December 4, 2024 updated by: Xinghua Liu, Peking University

Mechanism of Rumination in the Alleviation of Emotional Distress by Mindfulness-Based Interventions: Evidence from Behavioral Experiments

This study hopes to explore whether the changes in rumination exhibited in behavioral experiments mediates the effects of mindfulness intervention on alleviating emotional distress

Study Overview

Detailed Description

In recent years, mindfulness-based interventions (MBIs) have seen extensive application in both clinical and non-clinical settings. Studies show that mindfulness training improves emotional regulation and processing, contributing to better emotional health. MBIs have proven effective in reducing anxiety and depression among patients with conditions like multiple sclerosis, enhancing personal well-being, and alleviating chronic pain. Given the mounting evidence supporting its benefits, MBIs have become widely adopted across various settings. Nonetheless, the precise mechanisms through which mindfulness alleviates emotional distress remain poorly understood.

Rumination, a transdiagnostic process, plays a critical role in the development and persistence of emotional distress. Empirical evidence supports the effectiveness of MBIs in reducing rumination. However, the role of rumination in mediating the effects of MBIs on emotional distress remains inconsistent across studies. Kazdin (2007, 2009) outlined criteria for evaluating mechanisms and mediators, yet existing studies lack sufficient evidence to meet these standards. This study aims to explore the mechanistic role of rumination using behavioral experiments, focusing on the consistency criterion

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

160

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • - Subjects with scores greater than 21 on the Kessler Psychological Distress Scale.
  • - Aged 18-55 years old.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • - Subjects who could not access the Internet;
  • - Subjects with insufficient Chinese ability;
  • - Subjects who have participated in mindfulness based projects for more than 6 weeks before, and / or the current frequency of meditation practice is more than once a week;
  • - Subjects with schizophrenia or psychotic affective disorder, current organic mental disorder, substance abuse disorder and generalized developmental disorder;
  • - Subjects with high risk of suicide.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Supportive Care
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: MIED group
Mindfulness Intervention for Emotional Distress (MIED) program provides standard audio instructions for mindfulness exercises, introduces the nature and law of anxiety, depression, and other emotions, the source of anxiety, depression, and other emotional distress, and the strategies and methods to alleviate emotional distress. These exercises, knowledge, and strategies are based on the latest progress in the field of psychological counseling and treatment, and their application in daily life can help alleviate anxiety, depression, and other emotional problems.
Mindfulness Intervention for Emotional Distress (MIED) program provides standard audio instructions for mindfulness exercises, introduces the nature and law of anxiety, depression, and other emotions, the source of anxiety, depression, and other emotional distress, and the strategies and methods to alleviate emotional distress. These exercises, knowledge and strategies are based on the latest progress in the field of psychological counseling and treatment, and their application in daily life can help alleviate anxiety, depression and other emotional problems.
No Intervention: waitlist control group
no intervention

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Changes of Five Facet Mindfulness Questionnaire during the intervention
Time Frame: pre-intervention; week 3; week 5; immediately after the intervention
The Five Facet Mindfulness Questionnaire is a self-reported questionnaire measuring mindfulness levels. Scores range from 39 to 195, with higher scores indicating higher levels of mindfulness.
pre-intervention; week 3; week 5; immediately after the intervention
Changes of 10-item Kessler Psychological Distress Scale during the intervention
Time Frame: pre-intervention; week 3; week 5; immediately after the intervention
The 10-item Kessler Psychological Distress Scale is a self-reported questionnaire measuring distress. Scores range from 10 to 50, with higher scores indicating higher levels of distress.
pre-intervention; week 3; week 5; immediately after the intervention
Changes of Rumination-Reflection Questionnaire during the intervention
Time Frame: pre-intervention; week 3; week 5; immediately after the intervention
Rumination-Reflection Questionnaire is a self-reported questionnaire measuring Rumination level.Scores range from 12 to 60, with higher scores indicating higher levels of Rumination.
pre-intervention; week 3; week 5; immediately after the intervention
Changes of Overall Anxiety Severity and Impairment Scale during the intervention
Time Frame: pre-intervention; week 3; week 5; immediately after the intervention
The Overall Anxiety Severity and Impairment Scale is a self-reported questionnaire measuring anxiety. Scores range from 0 to 20, with higher scores indicating higher levels of anxiety.
pre-intervention; week 3; week 5; immediately after the intervention
Changes of Overall Depression Severity and Impairment Scale during the intervention
Time Frame: pre-intervention; week 3; week 5; immediately after the intervention
The Overall Depression Severity and Impairment Scale is a self-reported questionnaire measuring depression. Scores range from 0 to 20, with higher scores indicating higher levels of depression.
pre-intervention; week 3; week 5; immediately after the intervention
Changes of the Brief State Rumination Inventory during the intervention
Time Frame: pre-intervention; week 3; week 5; immediately after the intervention
The Brief State Rumination Inventory comprises eight items designed to measure an individual's state rumination tendency at a given moment, encompassing aspects such as the intensity of negative emotions, repetitive thinking, loss of thought control, and the strength of negative affect. The total score, which is derived by summing up the scores of all items, indicates the overall level of the measured construct.
pre-intervention; week 3; week 5; immediately after the intervention
Changes of the momentary repetitive negative thinking during the intervention
Time Frame: pre-intervention; week 3; week 5; immediately after the intervention
momentary repetitive negative thinking measures the "process" characteristics of rumination, which are traits that exist across diagnostic categories. The scale consists of four items (e.g., "Thoughts come to my mind that I would rather not have"). Each item focuses on a core feature of rumination - repetitiveness, intrusiveness, uncontrollability, and disruptiveness. Items are rated on a 7-point Likert scale, where 1 = not at all and 7 = extremely.
pre-intervention; week 3; week 5; immediately after the intervention

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Xinghua Liu, School of Psychological and Cognitive Sciences, Peking University

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Estimated)

December 10, 2024

Primary Completion (Estimated)

February 20, 2025

Study Completion (Estimated)

June 10, 2025

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

December 4, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 4, 2024

First Posted (Estimated)

December 9, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimated)

December 9, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 4, 2024

Last Verified

December 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Emotional Distress

Clinical Trials on Mindfulness Intervention for Emotional Distress(MIED)-normal version

Subscribe