Passive Music Listening in Acute Cerebrovascular Disease (MUSICSTROKE)

March 13, 2026 updated by: GIACOMO GIACALONE, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele

Ascolto Passivo di Musica Nella Malattia Cerebrovascolare Acuta

The aim of the study is to investigate whether passive music listening during the acute phase of stroke hospitalization is a feasible and acceptable intervention that can improve the patient's psychophysical well-being, reduce anxiety and depression indicators, and improve the patient's perception of their overall health status. Secondly, the effects during hospitalization on physiological parameters, pain perception, quality of sleep, and the use of sedative, antidepressant, or anxiolytic medications will be evaluated. Finally, it will be assessed whether passive music listening is also associated with an improvement in cognitive functions.

The clinical trial is a prospective, randomized, controlled, open-label, single-center study with parallel cohorts.

Subjects with acute cerebrovascular disease (ischemic stroke, hemorrhagic stroke) hospitalized in the Neurology-Stroke Unit at San Raffaele Hospital in Milan will be recruited.

Enrolled subjects will be randomly assigned to 2 groups:

  • Group 1: regular music listening starting since the acute phase of hospitalization (between 24 and 96 hours after symptom onset), continuing post-discharge for a total of 3 months.
  • Group 2: no regular music listening.

Measurements of psychophysical well-being, anxiety and depression scales, and cognitive functions will be performed at three different time points (baseline, discharge, and 3 months post-ischemic event during the routine follow-up visit as per standard care).

The primary outcome of the study are:

  • To evaluate whether passive music listening during hospitalization is associated with an improvement in anxiety/depression levels as measured by the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS).
  • To investigate whether passive music listening during hospitalization is associated with an improvement in the patient's perception of their overall health status as measured by the Italian version of the EQ-VAS (EuroQol Visual Analog Scale).
  • To assess the feasibility and acceptability of the intervention by measuring the percentage of patients who refuse to participate in the study and the drop-out rate during the hospitalization phase, the percentage of days with music listening during hospitalization, and the total amount of listening hours; through a feasibility, acceptability, and care appreciation questionnaire.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

150

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Milan, Italy, 20132
        • IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • time of enrollment greater than 24 hours and less than 4 days from onset of acute cerebrovascular disease
  • native Italian speaker
  • able to cooperate according to the following criteria:

    • NIHSS stroke severity score at enrollment <10.
    • No impairment in alertness, orientation, or language that would prevent adequate communication (NIHSS score <2 for items 1a, 1b, 1c, 9, 10).
    • No known pre-existing severe or moderate cognitive decline (CDR<2).
  • potentially able to continue music listening after discharge.
  • papable of giving informed consent for the study.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Deafness and/or significant hearing loss and/or significant visual impairment and/or illiteracy.
  • Major psychiatric illness.
  • Other conditions that, in the investigator's judgment, would prevent compliance with the protocol during hospitalization or the post-hospitalization phase.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Supportive Care
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: REGULAR MUSIC LISTENING
Patients randomized into this arm are provided with tablet and earphones for regular music listening during hospital stay (1 hour per day in average). After discharge, patients are instructed how to continue regular music listening till the follow-up visit. Patients are required to maintain a daily music listening diary to be presented at the follow-up visit.
Regular listening of self-selected music sung in Italian language during the hospital stay and after discharge till the follow-up visit after 3 months.
No Intervention: NO REGULAR MUSIC LISTENING
Patients randomized into this arm do not receive instrumentation for regular music listening during hospital stay. At discharge, patients in this arm are not required to perform regular music listening.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Improvement in anxiety/depression levels (HADS score) between baseline and discharge.
Time Frame: Baseline vs. discharge (up to 30 days)
Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS), total score ranges between 0-21, with higher values indicating higher levels of anxiety/depression.
Baseline vs. discharge (up to 30 days)
Improvement in the patient's perception of overall health status between baseline and discharge (EQ-VAS).
Time Frame: Baseline vs. discharge (up to 30 days)
EuroQol-visual analogue scales (EQ-VAS). The EQ-VAS is a vertical visual analogue scale that takes values between 100 (best imaginable health) and 0 (worst imaginable health), on which patients provide a global assessment of their health.
Baseline vs. discharge (up to 30 days)
Feasibility and acceptability during hospitalization (Percentage of patients who refuse to participate in the study)
Time Frame: Baseline
Percentage of patients who refuse to participate in the study
Baseline
Feasibility and acceptability during hospitalization (percentage of drop-outs).
Time Frame: Baseline-discharge (up to 30 days)
percentage of drop-outs.
Baseline-discharge (up to 30 days)
Feasibility and acceptability during hospitalization (percentage of days and total hours of music listening during the hospitalization phase).
Time Frame: Baseline-discharge (up to 30 days)
percentage of days and total hours of music listening during the hospitalization phase.
Baseline-discharge (up to 30 days)

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Improvement in anxiety/depression levels (HADS score)
Time Frame: 3 months (+/- 1 month) follow-up visit
Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS), total score ranges between 0-21, with higher values indicating higher levels of anxiety/depression.
3 months (+/- 1 month) follow-up visit
Improvement in the patient's perception of overall health status (EQ-VAS).
Time Frame: 3 months (+/- 1 month) follow-up visit
EuroQol-visual analogue scales (EQ-VAS). The EQ-VAS is a vertical visual analogue scale that takes values between 100 (best imaginable health) and 0 (worst imaginable health), on which patients provide a global assessment of their health.
3 months (+/- 1 month) follow-up visit
Feasibility and acceptability (percentage of drop-outs).
Time Frame: 3 months (+/- 1 month) follow-up visit
percentage of drop-outs
3 months (+/- 1 month) follow-up visit
Evaluation of cognitive functions through MoCA test
Time Frame: Basline vs. discharge (up to 30 days) vs. 3 months (+/- 1 month) follow-up visit
MoCA (Montreal Cognitive Assessment or The MoCA Test) is a tool for early detection of mild cognitive impairment; total score ranges between 0 and 30, with lower values indicating increasing cognitive impairment.
Basline vs. discharge (up to 30 days) vs. 3 months (+/- 1 month) follow-up visit
Evaluation of cognitive functions through Stroop test
Time Frame: Basline vs. discharge (up to 30 days) vs. 3 months (+/- 1 month) follow-up visit
The time interference score and the error interference score will be measured; according to normative data, the scores will be converted in equivalent scores from 0 to 4 with lower values indicating higher level of impairment.
Basline vs. discharge (up to 30 days) vs. 3 months (+/- 1 month) follow-up visit
Evaluation of cognitive functions through delayed story recall
Time Frame: Basline vs. discharge (up to 30 days) vs. 3 months (+/- 1 month) follow-up visit
The raw score will be converted, according to normative data, to an equivalent score between 0 and 4 with lower values indicating more impairment.
Basline vs. discharge (up to 30 days) vs. 3 months (+/- 1 month) follow-up visit
Patient perception of health status related to mobility, usual activities, anxiety, depression, and pain (EQ-5D-3L Italian version).
Time Frame: Baseline vs. discharge (up to 30 days) vs. 3 months (+/- 1 month) follow-up
The EQ-5D-3L (European Quality of Life 5 Dimensions 3 Level Version) is a Patient Reported Outcomes (PRO) which examines five dimensions: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort and anxiety/depression. Each dimension has 3 levels: no problems, some problems, and extreme problems. The questionnaire produces a 5-digit health state profile that represents the level of reported problems on each of the five dimensions of health. EQ-5D 5-digit health state is subsequently converted into a single index value, according to normative, which reflects the health state.
Baseline vs. discharge (up to 30 days) vs. 3 months (+/- 1 month) follow-up
Patient perception of sleep quality (ISI insomnia severity index, Italian version).
Time Frame: Baseline vs. discharge (up to 30 days) vs. 3 months (+/- 1 month) follow-up visit
The total score ranges from 0 to 28, with higher score indicating greater insomnia severity.
Baseline vs. discharge (up to 30 days) vs. 3 months (+/- 1 month) follow-up visit
Blood pressure, pre- and post-listening.
Time Frame: hospitalization phase (discharge-baseline, up to 30 days)
Blood pressure, pre- and post-listening to music. Measure unit: mmHg
hospitalization phase (discharge-baseline, up to 30 days)
Daily average number of administrations of sedatives, anxiolytics, and antidepressants.
Time Frame: hospitalization phase (discharge-baseline, up to 30 days)
hospitalization phase (discharge-baseline, up to 30 days)
Heart rate, pre- and post-listening.
Time Frame: hospitalization phase (discharge-baseline, up to 30 days)
Heart rate, pre- and post-listening to music. Measure unit: beats/min.
hospitalization phase (discharge-baseline, up to 30 days)
Feasibility and acceptability (percentage of days and total hours of music listening).
Time Frame: 3 months (+/- 1 month) follow-up visit
percentage of days and total hours of music listening.
3 months (+/- 1 month) follow-up visit

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

June 27, 2022

Primary Completion (Actual)

November 25, 2024

Study Completion (Actual)

February 27, 2025

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

December 4, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 16, 2024

First Posted (Actual)

December 19, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 17, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 13, 2026

Last Verified

May 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Acute Stroke

Clinical Trials on Regular music listening

Subscribe