- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT06762912
The Short-term Effect of Low-load Resistance Training with Blood-flow Restriction on Somatosensory-evoked Potentials in Healthy Young Adults
The Short-term Effect of Low-load Resistance Training with Blood-flow Restriction on Somatosensory-evoked Potentials in Healthy Young Adults - a Randomized Crossover Trial
The goal of this clinical trial is to investigate the short-term effect of lower limb BFRT on the somatosensory processing and related changes in SSEP amplitude and latency. The main questions it aims to answer are:
- Is there an effect of short-term application of BFRT on the somatosensory system?
- How do different cuff widths affect the somatosensory system?
- How do three different cuff widths affect perceived pain? Researchers will compare 3 different cuff widths to see if different cuff widths affect the somatosensory system and perceived pain.
Participants will:
- Undergo 3 experimental sessions, sessions will be separated by 72 hours and the order of the sessions to be randomly selected.
- Perform low-load resistance training with blood flow restriction.
Study Overview
Status
Detailed Description
The current study will be conducted in the college of health sciences, physiotherapy department, in the medical campus in the University of Sharjah, Sharjah, United Arab Emirates. The study design is a Randomized Crossover Trial, which will include three groups of healthy young adults, each group will use a different cuff widths (small cuff width (5 cm), medium cuff width (12 cm), and large cuff width (18 cm)). Participants in all three groups will undergo three experimental sessions in a random order, which will include the application of a blood flow restriction cuff combined with resistance exercise, the application of a blood flow restriction cuff without resistance exercise, and traditional resistance exercise without a blood flow restriction cuff. During each session, SSEP measurements will be recorded at three time points: before, during, and after the experimental session by stimulating the tibial nerve at the ankle and measuring the SSEP amplitude and latency.
Healthy young adults aged 18-30 years of both genders will be recruited through word of mouth and through social media by sharing the study flyer. Then, they will be screened for their eligibility to participate in the current study. Participants who will meet the eligibility criteria will be asked to provide their consent after the study is explained by filling out the consent form.
Participants will be randomly assigned to one of the three groups: (1) small cuff width (5 cm), (2) medium cuff width (12 cm), and (3) large cuff width (18 cm) by using permuted block randomization method with large, random, and variable block sizes to ensure groups are balanced and selection bias is minimized.
The first experimental session will start by conducting the one repetition maximum (1-RM) test of unilateral knee extension of the dominant leg, in which the dominant side was identified by asking the participants which side they will use to kick a ball. Before conducting the 1-RM test, 5 minutes warm-up on the cycle ergometer at 75W will be done. Calibration of the dynamometer will be done before operating the machine with each participant, then the participant will be positioned on the dynamometer seat comfortably with ensuring the back is supported and the knee is aligned with the axis of rotation. The participant will be asked to complete one successful repetition of knee extension through full range of motion (ROM), with increasing load until the participant can no longer complete full knee extension ROM, 3 minutes of rest will be allowed between attempts until the 1-RM is identified. To eliminate the effect of fatigue after 1-RM test, the first experimental session will always include the application of the BFR cuff without resistance exercise.
For both experimental sessions 2 and 3, the order of exercise condition will be randomly selected, either to be (1) the application of BFR cuff with resistance exercise, or (2) resistance exercise without the application of BFR cuff to decrease the incidence of learning effect. Cuff pressure during the application of BFR will be standardized to 50% of AOP.
The resistance exercise for both experimental sessions 2 and 3 will be exactly similar and will involve four sets of isometric knee extensions at an intensity of 20% of 1-RM with repetitions of 30, 15, 15, and 15 by using the isokinetic dynamometer machine, which has a good to excellent test-retest reliability for knee extension movement with ICC value of 0.95-0.99. To minimize cognitive and neuromuscular fatigue, the experimental sessions will be separated by a minimum of three days (72 hours).
Study Type
Enrollment (Estimated)
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Contact
- Name: Taif A. M. Omran, Master's Student
- Phone Number: +971551610573
- Email: u23102812@sharjah.ac.ae
Study Contact Backup
- Name: Dr. Tamer Mohamed Shousha, PhD
- Phone Number: +971562224469
- Email: tshousha@sharjah.ac.ae
Study Locations
-
-
-
Sharjah, United Arab Emirates
- University of Sharjah
-
Contact:
- Prof. Ibrahim Mostafa Abuamr, PhD
- Phone Number: +97165057513
- Email: iabuamr@sharjah.ac.ae
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Adult
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Participants will be included if they are aged 18-30 years of both genders, with no history of cardiovascular problems or osteo-articular problems in the lower limbs, and if they responded negatively to all items of the Physical Activity Readiness Questionnaire (PAR-Q).
- Participants will be included if they have a body mass index (BMI) less than 25 or non-overweight individuals.
- Use of the long international physical activity questionnaire (L-IPAQ) to ensure all participants have equal physical activity levels.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Participants will be excluded if they did not meet the inclusion criteria, and if they had a history of deep vein thrombosis (DVT), congenital heart disease, varicose veins, currently pregnant, or any contraindications to exercise.
- Participants will be excluded if they were diagnosed with any neurological disease.
- Participants will be excluded if they have had any musculoskeletal injury in the past 3 months to avoid potential effect on their physical activity levels.
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Supportive Care
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Crossover Assignment
- Masking: Single
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Passive application of BFR cuff
|
The first experimental session will start by conducting the one repetition maximum (1-RM) test of unilateral knee extension of the dominant leg, in which the dominant side was identified by asking the participants which side they will use to kick a ball.
Before conducting the 1-RM test, 5 minutes warm-up on the cycle ergometer at 75W will be done.
Calibration of the dynamometer will be done before operating the machine with each participant, then the participant will be positioned on the dynamometer seat comfortably with ensuring the back is supported and the knee is aligned with the axis of rotation.
The participant will be asked to complete one successful repetition of knee extension through full range of motion (ROM), with increasing load until the participant can no longer complete full knee extension ROM, 3 minutes of rest will be allowed between attempts until the 1-RM is identified.
|
|
Experimental: Resistance exercise with BFR
|
For both experimental sessions 2 and 3, the order of exercise condition will be randomly selected, either to be (1) the application of BFR cuff with resistance exercise, or (2) resistance exercise without the application of BFR cuff to decrease the incidence of learning effect. Cuff pressure during the application of BFR will be standardized to 50% of AOP. The resistance exercise for both experimental sessions 2 and 3 will be exactly similar and will involve four sets of isometric knee extensions at an intensity of 20% of 1-RM with repetitions of 30, 15, 15, and 15 by using the isokinetic dynamometer machine, which has a good to excellent test-retest reliability for knee extension movement with ICC value of 0.95-0.99. To minimize cognitive and neuromuscular fatigue, the experimental sessions will be separated by a minimum of three days (72 hours). |
|
Experimental: Resistance exercise without BFR
|
For both experimental sessions 2 and 3, the order of exercise condition will be randomly selected, either to be (1) the application of BFR cuff with resistance exercise, or (2) resistance exercise without the application of BFR cuff to decrease the incidence of learning effect. Cuff pressure during the application of BFR will be standardized to 50% of AOP. The resistance exercise for both experimental sessions 2 and 3 will be exactly similar and will involve four sets of isometric knee extensions at an intensity of 20% of 1-RM with repetitions of 30, 15, 15, and 15 by using the isokinetic dynamometer machine, which has a good to excellent test-retest reliability for knee extension movement with ICC value of 0.95-0.99. To minimize cognitive and neuromuscular fatigue, the experimental sessions will be separated by a minimum of three days (72 hours). |
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Somatosensory-evoked Potential
Time Frame: 1st Session: Before BFR cuff. During (4 times, 2 min apart). After (4 times, 5 min apart). 2nd & 3rd Sessions: Before exercise with/without BFR cuff. During (4 times, after each set, during rest period). After (4 times, 5 min apart).
|
SSEP is a reliable, reproducible, and frequently employed to detect alterations in electrophysiological conduction within the central and peripheral nervous pathways.
The assessment of SSEP will involve the placement of electrodes for tibial nerve stimulation at the ankle, which includes both stimulating and recording electrodes.
|
1st Session: Before BFR cuff. During (4 times, 2 min apart). After (4 times, 5 min apart). 2nd & 3rd Sessions: Before exercise with/without BFR cuff. During (4 times, after each set, during rest period). After (4 times, 5 min apart).
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Perceived Pain
Time Frame: Immediately after each session: - Rate perceived pain during the session (BFR cuff application and resistance exercise). - Rate if they are currently experiencing pain.
|
Visual analogue scale (VAS) is widely used to measure the frequency or intensity of various symptoms.
VAS is valid, reliable, and frequently used outcome measure to measure intensity of perceived pain.
Electronic-based VAS will be used to measure the level of perceived pain after the application of different cuff widths, where there will be a 10-cm/100-mm long horizontal line, with "No pain" to be rated as 0 mm, while "Worst imaginable pain" to be rated as 100 mm and the participant is asked to draw a vertical mark on the horizontal line indicating their level of perceived pain.
|
Immediately after each session: - Rate perceived pain during the session (BFR cuff application and resistance exercise). - Rate if they are currently experiencing pain.
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Publications and helpful links
General Publications
- Alghadir AH, Anwer S, Iqbal A, Iqbal ZA. Test-retest reliability, validity, and minimum detectable change of visual analog, numerical rating, and verbal rating scales for measurement of osteoarthritic knee pain. J Pain Res. 2018 Apr 26;11:851-856. doi: 10.2147/JPR.S158847. eCollection 2018.
- van Melick N, Meddeler BM, Hoogeboom TJ, Nijhuis-van der Sanden MWG, van Cingel REH. How to determine leg dominance: The agreement between self-reported and observed performance in healthy adults. PLoS One. 2017 Dec 29;12(12):e0189876. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0189876. eCollection 2017.
- Korakakis V, Whiteley R, Giakas G. Low load resistance training with blood flow restriction decreases anterior knee pain more than resistance training alone. A pilot randomised controlled trial. Phys Ther Sport. 2018 Nov;34:121-128. doi: 10.1016/j.ptsp.2018.09.007. Epub 2018 Sep 19.
- Broglio K. Randomization in Clinical Trials: Permuted Blocks and Stratification. JAMA. 2018 Jun 5;319(21):2223-2224. doi: 10.1001/jama.2018.6360. No abstract available. Erratum In: JAMA. 2022 Mar 1;327(9):880. doi: 10.1001/jama.2022.0836.
- Patterson SD, Hughes L, Warmington S, Burr J, Scott BR, Owens J, Abe T, Nielsen JL, Libardi CA, Laurentino G, Neto GR, Brandner C, Martin-Hernandez J, Loenneke J. Blood Flow Restriction Exercise: Considerations of Methodology, Application, and Safety. Front Physiol. 2019 May 15;10:533. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2019.00533. eCollection 2019. Erratum In: Front Physiol. 2019 Oct 22;10:1332. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2019.01332.
- Yusof, N., (2019). Likert Scale vs. Visual analogue scale on vehicle seat discomfort questionnaire: a review. Malaysian Journal of Medicine and Health Sciences, 15(204).
- Muzyka IM, Estephan B. Somatosensory evoked potentials. Handb Clin Neurol. 2019;160:523-540. doi: 10.1016/B978-0-444-64032-1.00035-7.
- Li X, Li J, Qing L, Wang H, Ma H, Huang P. Effect of quadriceps training at different levels of blood flow restriction on quadriceps strength and thickness in the mid-term postoperative period after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a randomized controlled external pilot study. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2023 May 8;24(1):360. doi: 10.1186/s12891-023-06483-x.
- Wanner M, Probst-Hensch N, Kriemler S, Meier F, Autenrieth C, Martin BW. Validation of the long international physical activity questionnaire: Influence of age and language region. Prev Med Rep. 2016 Mar 9;3:250-6. doi: 10.1016/j.pmedr.2016.03.003. eCollection 2016 Jun.
- Sousa J, Neto GR, Santos HH, Araujo JP, Silva HG, Cirilo-Sousa MS. Effects of strength training with blood flow restriction on torque, muscle activation and local muscular endurance in healthy subjects. Biol Sport. 2017 Mar;34(1):83-90. doi: 10.5114/biolsport.2017.63738. Epub 2016 Dec 1.
- Shousha T, Alayat M, Moustafa I. Effects of low-level laser therapy versus soft occlusive splints on mouth opening and surface electromyography in females with temporomandibular dysfunction: A randomized-controlled study. PLoS One. 2021 Oct 1;16(10):e0258063. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0258063. eCollection 2021.
- Cidem M, Sahin Z, Aydin T, Aysal F. Somatosensory evoked potential findings in ankylosing spondylitis. Eurasian J Med. 2014 Feb;46(1):42-6. doi: 10.5152/eajm.2013.100.
- Tuominen J, Leppanen M, Jarske H, Pasanen K, Vasankari T, Parkkari J. Test-Retest Reliability of Isokinetic Ankle, Knee and Hip Strength in Physically Active Adults Using Biodex System 4 Pro. Methods Protoc. 2023 Mar 9;6(2):26. doi: 10.3390/mps6020026.
- Maudrich T, Degener S, Ragert P, Kenville R. The impact of acute blood-flow-restriction resistance exercise on somatosensory-evoked potentials in healthy adults. Exp Physiol. 2024 Nov;109(11):1869-1881. doi: 10.1113/EP091911. Epub 2024 Sep 4.
- Fatela P, Reis JF, Mendonca GV, Avela J, Mil-Homens P. Acute effects of exercise under different levels of blood-flow restriction on muscle activation and fatigue. Eur J Appl Physiol. 2016 May;116(5):985-95. doi: 10.1007/s00421-016-3359-1. Epub 2016 Mar 26.
- Ilett MJ, Rantalainen T, Keske MA, May AK, Warmington SA. The Effects of Restriction Pressures on the Acute Responses to Blood Flow Restriction Exercise. Front Physiol. 2019 Aug 13;10:1018. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2019.01018. eCollection 2019.
- Carter, K., Scheffold, A. L., Renteria, J., Berger, V. W., Luo, Y. A., Chipman, J. J., & Sverdlov, O. (2024). Regulatory Guidance on Randomization and the Use of Randomization Tests in Clinical Trials: A Systematic Review. Statistics in Biopharmaceutical Research, 16(4), 428-440. https://doi.org/10.1080/19466315.2023.2239521
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Estimated)
Primary Completion (Estimated)
Study Completion (Estimated)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Other Study ID Numbers
- BFRT-SSEP
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on The Current Study Focuses on Investigating the Short-term Effect of BFRT on the Somatosensory System Among Healthy Young Adults
-
University of AarhusDanish National Birth Cohort (DNBC); Norwegian Mother and Child Cohort Study... and other collaboratorsRecruitingThe Focus is to Investigate Effect of an Educational Video on Fecundity Knowledge Among Young AdultsDenmark, Norway
Clinical Trials on Passive application of BFR cuff
-
Mayo ClinicCompleted
-
Sahmyook UniversityCompletedDepression | Cognition | Muscle Strength | Resistance Training | Balance | Elderly (People Aged 65 or More) | Blood Flow Restriction ExerciseKorea, Republic of
-
The Methodist Hospital Research InstituteActive, not recruitingDistal Radius FracturesUnited States
-
University of Colorado, DenverRecruitingACL TearUnited States
-
Johannes Kepler University of LinzCompletedFull Thickness Rotator Cuff TearAustria
-
Arab American University (Palestine)CompletedType 2 Diabetes MellitusPalestinian Territory, occupied
-
McMaster UniversityNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council, CanadaCompleted
-
Riphah International UniversityRecruitingBlood Flow RestrictionPakistan
-
Derek YellonCompletedIschemia | Covid19Brazil, South Africa, United Kingdom
-
Alexandria UniversityCompletedNeonatal Encephalopathy | Birth Asphyxia | Hypothermia, Newborn | Hypoxic EncephalopathyEgypt